
AI in E-Learning: Models and Applications
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we responsibly leverage AI to create personalized, effective, and ethical e-learning experiences while addressing its inherent limitations and challenges?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How can AI personalize learning experiences in e-learning?
- What are the ethical considerations of using AI in e-learning?
- How can AI tools be used to assess student learning and provide feedback in e-learning environments?
- What are the potential limitations and challenges of implementing AI in e-learning?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Understand the applications of AI in e-learning.
- Analyze the ethical considerations of AI in education.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of AI-driven personalized learning.
- Identify the limitations and challenges of AI implementation in e-learning.
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsAI Study Buddy Announcement
Students receive an email from the university president announcing a new AI 'study buddy' that will be available to all students. The AI is designed to help with studying, writing, and research, but some students worry about its impact on academic integrity and critical thinking. Students must evaluate the AI's effectiveness and propose guidelines for responsible use.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Ethical AI: Debate the Dilemmas
Students will participate in a debate on the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI in e-learning, including issues of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential for dehumanization of the learning experience.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-structured argument for or against the use of AI in e-learning, supported by evidence and ethical reasoning.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAnalyze the ethical considerations of AI in education.Personalized Learning: Experiment and Evaluate
Students will design and conduct a small-scale experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-driven personalized learning tool, assessing its impact on student engagement, learning outcomes, and satisfaction.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA research report that includes a description of the experiment, data collected, analysis of results, and conclusions about the effectiveness of the AI tool.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsEvaluate the effectiveness of AI-driven personalized learning.AI Challenges: White Paper Analysis
Students will create a white paper that identifies and analyzes the limitations and challenges of implementing AI in e-learning, such as the need for robust infrastructure, the digital divide, and the potential for job displacement.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA white paper that includes a detailed analysis of the limitations and challenges of AI implementation in e-learning, along with recommendations for addressing these issues.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsIdentify the limitations and challenges of AI implementation in e-learning.AI in E-Learning: Applications Unveiled
Students will research and present various applications of AI in e-learning, such as personalized learning paths, automated feedback systems, and intelligent tutoring systems.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA presentation that includes a summary of each AI application, its benefits, and potential drawbacks.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsUnderstand the applications of AI in e-learning.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioEthical AI Debate Rubric
Ethical AI Debate Assessment
Focuses on assessing the depth of understanding, argument quality, debate performance, and reflection quality related to ethical considerations of AI in e-learning.Understanding of Ethical Considerations
Depth of understanding and explanation of ethical considerations.
Beginning
1 PointsDemonstrates a superficial understanding of ethical considerations, with limited explanation.
Developing
2 PointsShows a basic understanding of ethical considerations, with some explanation.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates a thorough understanding of ethical considerations, providing clear explanations and examples.
Exemplary
4 PointsExhibits a sophisticated understanding of ethical considerations, providing insightful explanations, examples, and nuanced perspectives.
Argument Quality
Quality and relevance of arguments presented.
Beginning
1 PointsArguments are unclear, irrelevant, or unsupported by evidence.
Developing
2 PointsArguments are somewhat clear and relevant, with limited evidence.
Proficient
3 PointsArguments are clear, relevant, and supported by appropriate evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsArguments are exceptionally clear, relevant, insightful, and supported by strong evidence and reasoning.
Debate Performance
Effectiveness in presenting arguments and rebutting opposing viewpoints during the debate.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to articulate arguments or rebut opposing viewpoints effectively.
Developing
2 PointsPresents arguments and rebuttals with some clarity but lacks persuasiveness.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively presents arguments and rebuts opposing viewpoints with clarity and persuasiveness.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents arguments and rebuttals with exceptional clarity, persuasiveness, and insight, demonstrating mastery of the debate.
Reflection Quality
Clarity, coherence, and depth of reflection in the final paper.
Beginning
1 PointsReflection paper is unclear, incoherent, and lacks depth.
Developing
2 PointsReflection paper is somewhat clear and coherent but lacks depth in analysis.
Proficient
3 PointsReflection paper is clear, coherent, and provides a thorough reflection on the debate and the student's stance.
Exemplary
4 PointsReflection paper is exceptionally clear, coherent, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the ethical dilemmas and the student's reasoning.