
AI in Research: A University Project
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.Hogyan alakĂtja át a mestersĂ©ges intelligencia a kutatást, figyelembe vĂ©ve az etikai kĂ©rdĂ©seket, az eredmĂ©nyek Ă©rvĂ©nyessĂ©gĂ©t Ă©s a kutatĂłk szerepĂ©nek változását?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- Hogyan alkalmazható a mesterséges intelligencia a kutatási folyamat különböző szakaszaiban?
- Milyen etikai kérdések merülnek fel a mesterséges intelligencia kutatásban történő felhasználásakor?
- Hogyan befolyásolja a mestersĂ©ges intelligencia a kutatási eredmĂ©nyek Ă©rvĂ©nyessĂ©gĂ©t Ă©s megbĂzhatĂłságát?
- Milyen készségekre van szükség a kutatóknak a mesterséges intelligencia hatékony alkalmazásához?
- Hogyan változtatja meg a mesterséges intelligencia a kutatók szerepét és felelősségét?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Understand the applications of AI in research processes.
- Identify and analyze ethical considerations related to AI in research.
- Evaluate the impact of AI on the validity and reliability of research findings.
- Develop skills necessary for the effective application of AI in research.
- Analyze the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI.
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to students'The AI Research Takeover - A Dystopian Future?'
Present students with a short, fictional film depicting a future where AI dominates the research landscape, leading to unforeseen negative consequences. Students analyze the film and discuss how to prevent such a dystopian scenario, focusing on responsible AI implementation.'AI Research Tool Fair'
Organize a 'tool fair' where different AI-powered research tools are showcased. Students explore and test these tools, evaluating their potential benefits and drawbacks for various research tasks.'AI-Generated Research Paper Challenge'
Challenge students to identify AI-generated content in a collection of research papers. This activity sharpens their critical thinking skills and raises awareness about the potential for AI to create fraudulent or misleading research.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.AI Research Landscape Exploration
Students will begin by exploring the current landscape of AI in research. This involves researching various AI tools and technologies being used in different research fields.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA summary report outlining the current applications of AI in research, including specific tools and technologies.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Understand the applications of AI in research processes.Ethical AI Debate
Students will participate in a structured debate focusing on the ethical implications of using AI in research. This activity encourages critical thinking about potential biases, privacy concerns, and the responsible use of AI.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-researched debate presentation and reflection paper on the ethical considerations discussed.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Identify and analyze ethical considerations related to AI in research.Validity and Reliability Analysis
Students will analyze research papers that have utilized AI tools, focusing on how AI has impacted the validity and reliability of the findings.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative analysis report on the impact of AI on the validity and reliability of research findings.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Evaluate the impact of AI on the validity and reliability of research findings.AI Skill Development Workshop
Students will participate in hands-on workshops to develop practical skills in using AI tools for research purposes.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA portfolio demonstrating proficiency in using selected AI tools for research, including sample outputs and a reflective journal.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Develop skills necessary for the effective application of AI in research.The Future of the Researcher
Students will explore how AI is changing the roles and responsibilities of researchers, considering both the opportunities and challenges presented by these changes.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA reflective essay on the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI, incorporating insights from interviews and research.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Analyze the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioAI in Research Portfolio Rubric
AI Research Landscape Exploration
Demonstrates understanding of AI applications and tools in research fields.Scope of Exploration
Depth and breadth of research into AI applications in various research fields.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates comprehensive and insightful exploration of AI applications across a wide range of research fields. Identifies innovative and emerging AI tools.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates thorough exploration of AI applications in several research fields. Identifies commonly used AI tools and technologies.
Developing
2 PointsShows emerging exploration of AI applications in a limited number of research fields. Identifies some AI tools, but understanding is basic.
Beginning
1 PointsShows initial exploration of AI applications with limited understanding. Struggles to identify specific AI tools and technologies.
Summary Quality
Clarity, conciseness, and accuracy of the summary report.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe summary report is exceptionally clear, concise, and insightful. It provides a well-organized and accurate overview of AI applications in research, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the topic.
Proficient
3 PointsThe summary report is clear, concise, and accurate. It provides a well-organized overview of AI applications in research.
Developing
2 PointsThe summary report is somewhat unclear or incomplete. It provides a basic overview of AI applications in research but may lack detail or organization.
Beginning
1 PointsThe summary report is unclear, incomplete, and/or inaccurate. It fails to provide a coherent overview of AI applications in research.
Ethical AI Debate
Demonstrates understanding of ethical considerations related to AI in research through debate and reflection.Argumentation
Strength and persuasiveness of arguments presented during the debate.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents exceptionally strong and persuasive arguments, demonstrating deep understanding of ethical dilemmas and nuanced perspectives. Effectively anticipates and addresses counterarguments.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents well-reasoned and persuasive arguments, demonstrating thorough understanding of ethical dilemmas. Addresses counterarguments effectively.
Developing
2 PointsPresents arguments that are somewhat underdeveloped or unpersuasive. Shows basic understanding of ethical dilemmas but struggles to address counterarguments.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents weak or unclear arguments. Shows limited understanding of ethical dilemmas and fails to address counterarguments.
Reflection Quality
Depth and insightfulness of the reflection paper on ethical considerations.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe reflection paper demonstrates exceptional depth and insight, offering a nuanced and critical analysis of the ethical considerations discussed. Shows a sophisticated understanding of complex issues and proposes innovative solutions.
Proficient
3 PointsThe reflection paper demonstrates thorough understanding and insight, offering a thoughtful analysis of the ethical considerations discussed.
Developing
2 PointsThe reflection paper demonstrates basic understanding of ethical considerations but lacks depth and insight. Analysis is superficial.
Beginning
1 PointsThe reflection paper demonstrates limited understanding of ethical considerations and lacks analysis. Reflection is minimal.
Validity and Reliability Analysis
Demonstrates ability to critically analyze the impact of AI on research validity and reliability.Analytical Depth
Depth and thoroughness of the analysis of research papers using AI.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides an exceptionally deep and thorough analysis of research papers using AI, demonstrating sophisticated understanding of methodological nuances and potential biases. Identifies subtle impacts on validity and reliability.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a thorough analysis of research papers using AI, demonstrating clear understanding of methodological considerations and potential biases. Identifies key impacts on validity and reliability.
Developing
2 PointsProvides a basic analysis of research papers using AI, showing emerging understanding of methodological considerations. Identifies some impacts on validity and reliability, but analysis is limited.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides a superficial analysis of research papers using AI, showing limited understanding of methodological considerations. Fails to adequately assess impacts on validity and reliability.
Comparative Insight
Quality of the comparative analysis report discussing strengths and weaknesses.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe comparative analysis report is exceptionally insightful and well-reasoned, providing a nuanced evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using AI in different research contexts. Offers innovative suggestions for improving research integrity.
Proficient
3 PointsThe comparative analysis report is insightful and well-reasoned, providing a balanced evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using AI in different research contexts.
Developing
2 PointsThe comparative analysis report provides a basic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of using AI in different research contexts but lacks depth and insight.
Beginning
1 PointsThe comparative analysis report is superficial and lacks clear comparisons. Fails to adequately evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of using AI in different research contexts.
AI Skill Development Workshop
Demonstrates practical skills in using AI tools for research and reflects on the learning process.Tool Proficiency
Demonstrated ability to effectively use selected AI tools.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates exceptional proficiency in using selected AI tools, showcasing advanced techniques and innovative applications. Produces high-quality outputs that effectively address complex research questions.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates proficiency in using selected AI tools, producing quality outputs that address research questions effectively.
Developing
2 PointsShows emerging proficiency in using selected AI tools. Outputs are functional but may require further refinement.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to use selected AI tools effectively. Outputs are incomplete or inaccurate.
Reflective Journal Quality
Insightfulness and completeness of the reflective journal documenting the learning process.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe reflective journal provides exceptionally insightful and detailed documentation of the learning process, including challenges faced, skills acquired, and innovative strategies for overcoming obstacles. Shows a deep understanding of personal growth and metacognition.
Proficient
3 PointsThe reflective journal provides thorough and insightful documentation of the learning process, including challenges faced and skills acquired.
Developing
2 PointsThe reflective journal provides basic documentation of the learning process but lacks detail and insight. Challenges and skills are described superficially.
Beginning
1 PointsThe reflective journal is incomplete and lacks meaningful reflection. Fails to adequately document the learning process.
The Future of the Researcher
Demonstrates understanding of the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI.Interview Integration
Effective incorporation of insights from researcher interviews.
Exemplary
4 PointsSeamlessly integrates insightful perspectives from researcher interviews, using direct quotes and detailed examples to support arguments and demonstrate a deep understanding of the evolving researcher role. Connects interview findings to broader trends in AI and research.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively integrates relevant perspectives from researcher interviews to support arguments and demonstrate understanding of the evolving researcher role.
Developing
2 PointsIncludes some perspectives from researcher interviews, but integration is superficial and lacks clear connection to arguments.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to adequately incorporate insights from researcher interviews. Interview content is irrelevant or missing.
Essay Depth
Depth and insightfulness of the reflective essay on the evolving researcher role.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe reflective essay is exceptionally insightful and well-reasoned, providing a nuanced and critical analysis of the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI. Proposes innovative strategies for adapting to these changes and addressing ethical considerations.
Proficient
3 PointsThe reflective essay is insightful and well-reasoned, providing a thorough analysis of the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers in the age of AI.
Developing
2 PointsThe reflective essay provides a basic overview of the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers but lacks depth and insight.
Beginning
1 PointsThe reflective essay is superficial and lacks clear analysis. Fails to adequately address the evolving roles and responsibilities of researchers.