
Alcatraz Escape: An Argumentative Essay
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.To what extent was the 1962 Alcatraz escape successful, and how can we construct a convincing argument, using varied sources, to support our position?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- Was the Alcatraz escape successful, and what evidence supports or refutes this claim?
- How do different accounts (articles, videos) structure their arguments about the Alcatraz escape, and how does this affect their persuasiveness?
- What makes an argument convincing, and how can we construct our own strong arguments about the Alcatraz escape?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to analyze multiple sources of information about the Alcatraz escape, identifying key claims and evidence.
- Students will be able to evaluate the structure and persuasiveness of different arguments presented in articles and videos.
- Students will be able to construct a well-reasoned argumentative essay that supports a clear point of view about the Alcatraz escape, using relevant evidence and effective reasoning.
- Students will be able to participate in collaborative discussions, sharing their analysis and respectfully considering different perspectives to refine their understanding of the Alcatraz escape and argumentation techniques.
Teacher-Provided Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Alcatraz Mystery Package
A mysterious package arrives at the classroom, containing a partially decoded letter, a grainy photograph of Alcatraz, and a set of cryptic clues related to the escape. Students must work together to decipher the clues, sparking their curiosity about the event and prompting initial research into the history and the escape attempt.The Mysterious Phone Call
Begin with a short, suspenseful audio recording of a fictional phone call reporting a potential sighting of the Alcatraz escapees years after the event. The recording ends abruptly, leaving students with questions and a sense of intrigue, driving them to investigate the evidence and form their own opinions on the escape.Alcatraz Escape Room Challenge
Create a virtual escape room challenge where students navigate a digital model of Alcatraz, solving puzzles and analyzing evidence related to the escape attempt. Successful completion of the escape room requires students to engage with the historical details and begin to form their own hypotheses about the fate of the escapees.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Discussion Norms Contract
Students will form small groups to establish norms for respectful and productive discussions. Each group member will be assigned a specific role (e.g., facilitator, note-taker, questioner, summarizer) to ensure active participation and accountability.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA collaboratively created group contract outlining discussion rules, assigned roles, and individual responsibilities.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Standard 1 (collaborative discussions): Focuses on establishing ground rules and defining roles within group discussions.Thesis Statement Builder
Students will learn about the key components of an argumentative essay (introduction, claim, reasons, evidence, counterclaims, conclusion) and practice crafting a strong thesis statement related to the Alcatraz escape.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-defined thesis statement that takes a clear position on whether the Alcatraz escape was successful or not, along with a brief outline of supporting reasons.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Standard 2 (argumentative writing): Introduces the basic structure of an argumentative essay and helps students formulate a clear thesis statement.Source Structure Analysis
Students will analyze two different sources (e.g., a news article and a documentary) about the Alcatraz escape, focusing on how each source structures its argument (e.g., chronological, cause-and-effect, problem-solution).Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative analysis chart that outlines the structure of each source, identifies the key claims and evidence presented, and evaluates the effectiveness of each structure in persuading the audience.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Standard 6c (text structure): Students will examine how different sources structure their arguments about the Alcatraz escape and how this impacts their persuasiveness.Evidence Detective Report
Students will trace specific claims made in articles and videos about the Alcatraz escape and assess whether the evidence provided is sufficient to support those claims. They will consider the credibility, relevance, and accuracy of the evidence.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn evidence evaluation report for each source, identifying key claims, assessing the quality and sufficiency of the evidence, and determining the overall strength of the argument.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Standard 6d (evidence assessment): Students will evaluate the quality and sufficiency of evidence presented in different sources about the Alcatraz escape.The Great Alcatraz Debate
Students will participate in a debate about whether the Alcatraz escape was successful, using the evidence and analysis they have gathered in previous activities. They will practice active listening, respectful communication, and persuasive argumentation.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityParticipation in a structured debate, demonstrating the ability to present a clear argument, support claims with evidence, and respond to opposing viewpoints.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Standard 1 (collaborative discussions) and Standard 2 (argumentative writing): Students will participate in a structured debate, presenting their arguments and engaging with opposing viewpoints.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioThesis Statement Builder Rubric
Thesis Statement and Outline Quality
Focuses on the quality and clarity of the thesis statement and the strength of the supporting reasons provided in the outline.Clarity and Focus of Thesis
Assesses the clarity and focus of the thesis statement regarding the success or failure of the Alcatraz escape.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe thesis statement is exceptionally clear, concise, and directly addresses the central question of the Alcatraz escape's success. It demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic and presents a compelling, focused argument.
Proficient
3 PointsThe thesis statement is clear, focused, and takes a definite position on the success or failure of the Alcatraz escape. It provides a solid foundation for the argument.
Developing
2 PointsThe thesis statement is present but may lack clarity or focus. The position on the Alcatraz escape may be vague or overly broad, requiring further refinement.
Beginning
1 PointsThe thesis statement is missing, unclear, or does not take a position on the success or failure of the Alcatraz escape. There is little to no discernible argument presented.
Quality of Supporting Reasons
Evaluates the quality and relevance of reasons provided to support the thesis statement.
Exemplary
4 PointsReasons provided are exceptionally relevant, insightful, and convincingly support the thesis statement. Demonstrates sophisticated analysis and critical thinking.
Proficient
3 PointsReasons provided are relevant and logically support the thesis statement. Demonstrates effective analysis and critical thinking.
Developing
2 PointsReasons provided are somewhat relevant but may lack logical connection to the thesis statement or require further elaboration.
Beginning
1 PointsReasons provided are irrelevant, illogical, or do not support the thesis statement. Demonstrates minimal understanding of the topic and argumentation.
Organization and Structure of Outline
Assesses the organization and structure of the outline, ensuring a logical flow of ideas and a clear presentation of the argument.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe outline is exceptionally well-organized, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of argumentative structure and a seamless flow of ideas. The structure enhances the clarity and persuasiveness of the argument.
Proficient
3 PointsThe outline is well-organized with a logical flow of ideas, clearly presenting the intended argument. The structure supports the clarity and persuasiveness of the argument.
Developing
2 PointsThe outline is somewhat organized but may lack a clear flow of ideas or require further structural development to effectively present the argument.
Beginning
1 PointsThe outline is disorganized, lacking a logical flow of ideas and failing to present a coherent argument. Demonstrates minimal understanding of argumentative structure.