
Banking on Change: The Fed and the Great Crash
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as economic detectives, use the 'red flags' of the early 1900s to decide if an economy is truly strong or just 'roaring' toward a crash?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How did the 'Panic of 1907' and other early bank failures change the way Americans thought about their money?
- Why did the government decide we needed a 'bank for banks' (The Federal Reserve), and how is it supposed to protect us?
- Even though the 1920s were called 'Roaring,' what were the hidden problems or 'cracks' in the economy?
- How did problems for farmers and factory workers in the 1920s lead to bigger problems for the whole country?
- What are the 'red flags' that tell us an economy might be headed for trouble?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will identify and explain the significance of the Panic of 1907 and how it led to the creation of the Federal Reserve System.
- Students will analyze the role of the Federal Reserve as a central bank designed to provide economic stability and prevent bank failures.
- Students will evaluate the economic indicators (red flags) of the late 1920s, including overproduction in agriculture and industry, and the rise of consumer debt.
- Students will synthesize historical data to distinguish between the 'roaring' public perception of the 1920s economy and its underlying structural weaknesses.
- Students will demonstrate 'economic detective' skills by citing evidence from historical documents to justify whether an economy is healthy or unstable.
Common Core State Standards (History/Social Studies)
C3 Framework for Social Studies State Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Great Classroom Bank Run
Students enter to find the 'Classroom Bank' shuttered with a 'Closed Indefinitely' sign. They are given 'Bank Books' showing their accumulated participation points/rewards, but told they cannot withdraw them because the bank ran out of physical cash during a 'panic.' This simulation forces students to grapple with the lack of a central lender (the Fed) to back up local banks.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Case of the Missing Cash: The 1907 Investigation
In this introductory activity, students act as lead detectives investigating the 'Crime of the Century'—the Panic of 1907. They will examine why the classroom bank 'failed' in the entry event and compare it to the historical panic that nearly collapsed the U.S. economy before the Federal Reserve existed. The goal is to understand that without a central system, individual banks are vulnerable to 'runs.'Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Crime Scene Case File' that includes a list of 'Suspects' (causes of the panic), 'Witness Testimony' (summaries of primary source accounts), and a 'Detective’s Theory' on why the bank run occurred.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.1 (citing evidence from primary sources) and C3 D2.His.14.9-12 (analyzing complex causes of historical events).The Federal Reserve Shield: Designing the Safety Net
Students will design a 'Safety Blueprint' for the newly created Federal Reserve (established in 1913). They will learn about the Fed's three main tools: the discount rate, reserve requirements, and open market operations, but simplified as 'The Three Safety Valves.' They will explain how these valves are meant to prevent the 'explosions' (panics) they investigated in Activity 1.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn annotated 'Economic Safety Shield' poster or digital infographic that illustrates the three main ways the Federal Reserve protects the banking system.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with C3 D2.Eco.15.9-12 (evaluating government policies) and C3 D2.Eco.12.9-12 (explaining how policies affect economic stability).Roaring or Rigged? The Red Flag Hunt
Students will shift their focus to the 1920s. While the era is often called 'Roaring,' students will use their detective skills to find 'cracks' in the economy. They will analyze data on farm foreclosures, the rise of 'buying on margin' (debt), and overproduction in factories. This activity helps students see that a 'booming' economy can hide systemic weaknesses.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Red Flag Map' of the 1920s United States, where students place warning icons over specific sectors (Farms, Factories, Banks) with brief explanations of the hidden trouble in each area.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.7 (integrating visual and quantitative data) and C3 D2.Eco.12.9-12 (analyzing income distribution and labor markets).The Final Verdict: Why the 'Roar' Turned into a Crash
In this final summative activity, students compile all their evidence to answer the driving question. They will perform an 'Economic Autopsy' on the year 1929. They will look at how the 'Red Flags' they found in Activity 3 combined with the limitations of the early Federal Reserve to cause the Great Crash. This activity synthesizes all previous learning into a final verdict.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe 'Economic Detective’s Final Report': A multi-modal presentation (slides, recorded video, or a written dossier) that identifies the three primary causes of the 1929 crash and provides a 'Recommendation for the Future' to prevent it from happening again.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.1 (citing evidence) and C3 D2.His.14.9-12 (analyzing complex causes/effects).Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioEconomic Detective: The Federal Reserve & Great Crash Portfolio Rubric
Monetary Origins & The Federal Reserve
Focuses on the historical necessity and functional design of the Federal Reserve in response to early 20th-century financial crises.Investigating Economic Instability (Panic of 1907)
Students analyze the causes of the Panic of 1907 and the resulting need for a centralized banking system, using primary source evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsIndependently identifies multiple causes of the 1907 panic; provides a sophisticated 'Detective’s Theory' that clearly explains why private intervention (JP Morgan) was a temporary fix and why a government-led central bank was necessary. Use of primary sources is precise and insightful.
Proficient
3 PointsIdentifies the primary causes of the 1907 panic; explains the role of JP Morgan and the basic need for a central bank. 'Detective’s Theory' is logical and supported by primary source evidence found in headlines and photos.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies some causes of the 1907 panic with teacher support; 'Detective’s Theory' is partially developed but may lack clear connection between the bank run and the need for a central system. Uses some evidence from primary sources.
Beginning
1 PointsIdentifies limited aspects of the 1907 panic; 'Detective's Theory' is incomplete or missing. Struggles to connect the 'Classroom Bank Run' to the historical event even with significant prompting.
Understanding the Federal Reserve System
Students demonstrate understanding of how the Federal Reserve acts as a 'lender of last resort' and uses policy tools to stabilize the economy.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a comprehensive 'Safety Blueprint' that accurately explains all three 'Safety Valves' (tools) and their impact on the economy; the 'Guarantee Statement' is written with high clarity and demonstrates deep empathy for the public's financial fears.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately labels the 'Bank for Banks' diagram and explains at least two 'Safety Valves' (tools). The 'Guarantee Statement' clearly communicates why the Fed makes the banking system safer than it was in 1907.
Developing
2 PointsLabels parts of the 'Bank for Banks' diagram with help; explains one 'Safety Valve' tool. The 'Guarantee Statement' is basic or relies heavily on provided sentence frames without adding original thought.
Beginning
1 PointsLabels are incomplete or inaccurate; struggles to explain the purpose of the Federal Reserve even with simplified graphic-novel style texts. 'Guarantee Statement' is missing or unclear.
Analyzing 1920s Economic 'Cracks'
Assesses the ability to look beyond surface-level prosperity to identify underlying economic structural failures.Economic Detective Skills (Detecting Red Flags)
Students interpret diverse data sets (charts, maps, simulations) to identify systemic weaknesses in the 1920s economy.
Exemplary
4 PointsIdentifies all major 'Red Flags' (agriculture, factory overproduction, consumer debt) and makes insightful connections between them; explains how 'buying on margin' created a 'roaring' illusion. Map icons are placed with detailed, accurate justifications.
Proficient
3 PointsCorrectly identifies at least three 'Red Flags' using the provided checklist; explains the difference between rising stocks and falling crop prices. 'Red Flag Map' is complete with accurate explanations for each sector.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies 1-2 'Red Flags' with assistance; 'Red Flag Map' is partially complete. Shows basic understanding that farmers and factory workers were struggling while others were 'roaring.'
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to identify 'Red Flags' even with a checklist; does not successfully complete the 'Buy Now, Pay Later' simulation or connect it to economic risk. Map icons are misplaced or lack explanation.
Synthesis & Evidence-Based Reporting
Evaluates the ability to integrate information from diverse formats to solve the 'Economic Detective' challenge.The Final Verdict (Synthesis & Argumentation)
Students synthesize evidence from all activities to create a final report on the causes of the 1929 crash and propose future-oriented solutions.
Exemplary
4 PointsSynthesizes complex causes into a compelling 'Economic Autopsy'; the 'Verdict' uses 'Smoking Gun' evidence to link the Fed's early limitations to the Great Crash. 'Recommendations for the Future' are creative and show high-level critical thinking.
Proficient
3 PointsCompiles a 'Final Report' that identifies three primary causes of the crash; uses sentence frames effectively to deliver a clear 'Verdict.' Recommendation for the future is logical and grounded in the evidence collected.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies 1-2 causes of the crash in the 'Final Report'; 'Verdict' is present but may be simplistic or missing one of the 'Smoking Guns.' Recommendations are general or lack specific connection to the 1929 context.
Beginning
1 PointsFinal Report is incomplete; struggles to state a 'Verdict' or link the 'Red Flags' to the actual crash. Presentation lacks clear evidence from the previous 'Case Files.'
Use of Evidence & Multi-Modal Communication
Assesses the student's ability to cite specific textual, visual, and quantitative evidence to support their economic conclusions. (Aligned with SPED accommodations).
Exemplary
4 PointsIndependently cites multiple forms of evidence (data charts, primary source quotes, simulation outcomes) to support every claim; evidence is seamlessly integrated into the multi-modal presentation.
Proficient
3 PointsCites specific evidence from at least two different sources (e.g., a photo and a data chart) to support the final 'Verdict.' Effectively uses provided scaffolds to organize evidence.
Developing
2 PointsIncludes evidence in the report but it may be vague or not clearly linked to the specific claim. Relies heavily on teacher prompts to identify which evidence to include.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides minimal or no evidence to support claims; report consists mostly of unsupported opinions or incomplete thoughts. Struggles to use the provided 'Case Files.'