
Cardboard Mini Home Construction and Math Application
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we apply mathematical concepts to create an accurate scale model of a home, and use it to determine the real-world materials needed for its construction?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How do scale models help in understanding and planning real-world constructions?
- What mathematical concepts are necessary to accurately calculate volume and surface area?
- How do we apply mathematical calculations to determine materials needed for construction projects?
- In what ways does geometry influence the design and construction of buildings?
- How can mathematical accuracy affect decision-making in real-world scenarios such as architecture and construction?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will apply geometric methods to design and construct a scale model of a mini home using cardboard, enhancing spatial reasoning and practical geometry skills.
- Students will calculate the volume and surface area of the scale model accurately to determine the materials needed, illustrating the use of mathematics in solving real-world architectural problems.
- Students will develop an understanding of how scale models function in the planning and execution of construction projects, bridging theoretical concepts with practical application.
- Students will strengthen their ability to use geometric formulas to solve complex problems involving dimensions, volume, and surface area calculations.
Common Core Math Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsBlueprint Analysis Challenge
Students are introduced to a set of diverse blueprints representing various mini home designs. Their task is to analyze these blueprints to identify potential materials required, calculate volume and surface area, and suggest enhancements based on mathematical calculations, fostering skills in architectural analysis and practical math application.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.3D Construction Exploration
Students translate their scaled blueprints into a 3D model using cardboard cutouts, fostering spatial reasoning and practical skills in construction.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA completed 3D cardboard scale model of the mini home based on individual blueprints.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity is aligned with standards HSG-MG.A.3 and HSG-GMD.B.4 as students apply geometric reasoning in constructing 3D shapes from 2D designs.Mathematical Calculations Laboratory
Here, students calculate the volume and surface area of different sections of their cardboard mini home, preparing them for determining real-world needs like materials and energy efficiency.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive calculation summary detailing volume and surface area for each segment of the mini home, justifying material estimates.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with HSG-GMD.A.1 and HSG-GMD.A.3, focusing on application of volume and area formulas to solve problems.Material Estimation Strategy Session
Using the calculations from the previous activity, students will estimate the quantity of building materials needed for the mini home, including discussions on cost and sustainability.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed report or presentation that outlines material requirements, costs, and sustainability considerations for the mini home.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis step relates to HSG-MG.A.3, encouraging students to consider real-world constraints and design optimization in their planning.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioMathematical and Constructive Modeling Rubric
Geometric Construction
Assessment of the students' ability to construct a scale model accurately using cardboard and blueprints.Construction Accuracy
Measures the precision in translating blueprints into a 3D model with accurate dimensions and alignment.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe 3D model is constructed with perfect alignment and dimensional accuracy, exactly reflecting the blueprint and requiring no adjustments.
Proficient
3 PointsThe 3D model is mostly accurate with minor alignment issues that do not significantly affect the model's integrity.
Developing
2 PointsThe 3D model has noticeable alignment and dimensional inconsistencies but maintains overall structure.
Beginning
1 PointsThe 3D model is poorly aligned with significant dimensional errors, failing to represent the blueprint effectively.
Use of Construction Techniques
Evaluates the use of techniques for accurate measurement and assembly during model construction.
Exemplary
4 PointsAdvanced techniques are employed, resulting in a flawless and precise model construction.
Proficient
3 PointsAdequate techniques are used with some room for refinement, resulting in a well-constructed model.
Developing
2 PointsBasic techniques are applied with noticeable errors affecting the construction quality.
Beginning
1 PointsLimited techniques applied, causing significant issues with model integrity.
Mathematical Application
Evaluation of the application of geometric formulas and calculations used in the modeling project.Calculation Accuracy
Assesses the precision of calculations for volume and surface area as applied to the model construction.
Exemplary
4 PointsAll calculations are accurate, well-documented, and applied correctly to determine material needs.
Proficient
3 PointsMost calculations are accurate and correctly documented, with minor errors that do not impact overall results.
Developing
2 PointsSeveral calculation errors exist, revealing gaps in understanding or application of formulas.
Beginning
1 PointsCalculations are mostly incorrect, lacking coherence and understanding of geometric principles.
Justification of Calculations
Examines the students' ability to justify their calculations and reasoning in determining material quantities.
Exemplary
4 PointsComprehensive and logical justification of calculations is provided, showing superior reasoning and understanding.
Proficient
3 PointsReasonable justification is evident with minor gaps in logic, demonstrating good understanding and reasoning.
Developing
2 PointsJustification is limited and partially coherent, indicating areas for growth in reasoning skills.
Beginning
1 PointsJustifications lack clarity and logical structure, reflecting minimal reasoning.
Real-World Integration
Assessment of studentsβ ability to correlate the model and calculations to real-world contexts and implications.Material Estimation and Analysis
Evaluates the students' capacity to estimate and analyze material needs, costs, and sustainability factors based on their calculations.
Exemplary
4 PointsMaterial estimates are precise, with comprehensive analysis of costs and sustainability thoroughly integrated into the report.
Proficient
3 PointsMaterial estimates are mostly accurate with good analysis but lack comprehensive integration of all factors.
Developing
2 PointsMaterial estimates show inaccuracies and limited analysis, with sustainability concerns minimally addressed.
Beginning
1 PointsMaterial estimates are significantly flawed, with little to no analysis of costs or sustainability considerations.