
Change the School: Proposal & Pitch
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we identify a school policy or practice in need of change, and develop a compelling research-based proposal to present to school administrators for implementation?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What are the current policies or practices in our school that could be improved or changed?
- How can you effectively research and present evidence to support your proposal for a change in school policy?
- What are the components of a persuasive proposal, and how do you organize them effectively?
- How can you effectively communicate your ideas and suggestions in a formal presentation to school administrators?
- What role does research play in forming strong arguments for a proposal?
- How can identifying the audience influence the way we construct our proposal and presentation?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will identify a policy or practice within their school that requires change or improvement.
- Students will conduct research to gather evidence that supports their proposal for changing a school policy or practice.
- Students will develop a formal persuasive proposal using valid reasoning and evidence to support their suggested changes to school policies.
- Students will organize their claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence in a clear and logical structure within their proposal.
- Students will present their proposals in a formal and impactful manner to school administrators, effectively communicating their ideas.
- Students will engage in peer and self-assessment to refine their proposals and presentations before final delivery.
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Great Debate: Tradition vs. Innovation
Kick off the project with a school-wide debate where students argue for or against classic school rules versus proposed modern changes. This encourages students to research and recognize the importance of policy evolution and allows them to see firsthand how persuasive arguments can provoke thought and incite change.Student-Led Town Hall
Host a student-led town hall meeting where they can voice their concerns and desires for school policy changes directly to school administrators. This approach empowers students to dive into issues they’re passionate about, providing a real-world platform for their ideas.Your Voice Matters Photography Exhibit
Students contribute to a photography project that captures moments from their daily school life they wish to change or highlight. Display the exhibit to spark conversations and ideas on what policies could evolve, tying visual storytelling with persuasive writing and research.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Research Rigor Roundup
Building on their policy issue, students collect credible evidence and data to support their case for change, focusing on maintaining an objective and formal tone.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn organized research portfolio containing credible sources and evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1, W.9-10.7, and W.9-10.8 by requiring extensive research and evaluation of evidence, and objective data integration.The Proposal Blueprint
Students draft a formal proposal outline, structuring their arguments, counterclaims, and evidence in a coherent manner.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive outline detailing key arguments and counterarguments for the proposal.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsFulfills standards W.9-10.1.a & b, focusing on claim organization and counterclaims to enhance argument structure.Persuasive Proposal Polish
Polishing the full draft of the persuasive proposal by integrating research, fine-tuning wording, and maintaining a formal style. Students focus on ensuring their communication is effective and logical.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA polished persuasive proposal ready for presentation.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.1.d by ensuring a formal and coherent writing style while incorporating feedback.Pitch Perfect
Students prepare and practice a formal presentation of their proposal to convey their ideas concisely and convincingly.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA persuasive and well-practiced presentation of policy change proposal.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis final activity aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.9-10.4, supporting students' development in logical and clear presentation skills.Policy Sleuth Investigation
Students become detectives, identifying a school policy or practice they want to change, understanding its implications, and considering potential improvements.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA clearly defined and well-justified policy issue statement.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1 as it requires students to cite textual evidence and analyze current policy implications.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioSchool Policy Proposal Rubric
Research and Evidence
Assessment of the student's ability to conduct thorough research and compile robust evidence to support their proposal.Source Evaluation
Evaluate the relevance and credibility of sources used for the proposal.
Exemplary
4 PointsSelects only highly credible and relevant sources, demonstrating thorough evaluation and understanding of their importance to the proposal.
Proficient
3 PointsSelects mostly credible and relevant sources, exhibiting effective evaluation with minor gaps in rationale.
Developing
2 PointsSelects sources of mixed credibility with evident shortcomings in evaluation and source relevance.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to select credible sources and does not provide adequate evaluation or justification for their choices.
Evidence Integration
Ability to integrate evidence effectively into the proposal.
Exemplary
4 PointsSeamlessly integrates compelling evidence that enhances arguments, maintaining coherence and a strong support base throughout.
Proficient
3 PointsIntegrates relevant evidence effectively with few inconsistencies in coherence or alignment with arguments.
Developing
2 PointsIntegrates some evidence, though there are notable gaps or weaknesses in maintaining coherence and support for arguments.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to integrate evidence, resulting in arguments that are poorly supported or incoherent.
Proposal Structure and Organization
Evaluates the logical organization of arguments, counterclaims, and the overall coherence of the proposal.Argument Organization
Clarity and logic in the organization of claims, counterclaims, and supporting evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a clear, logically organized proposal with well-developed claims and counterclaims that flow seamlessly.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents a coherent proposal with mostly logical organization, though minor improvements could enhance flow.
Developing
2 PointsProposal lacks logical organization, with several disjointed or unsupported arguments.
Beginning
1 PointsArgument structure is unclear and lacks a coherent flow or organization.
Persuasive Communication
Assessment of the student’s ability to persuasively communicate intent and information both in writing and orally.Persuasive Writing
Effectiveness of written communication in persuading the reader.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates an exceptional ability to persuade through a clear, compelling argument, outstanding use of rhetoric, and a formal tone.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a persuasive argument with effective use of rhetoric and mostly formal tone.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to persuade with limited effectiveness, lacking strong rhetoric or consistency in tone.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to present a persuasive argument, with ineffective rhetoric and informal tone.
Oral Presentation
Ability to present clearly and effectively in support of the proposal.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a highly engaging, well-structured oral presentation, demonstrating excellent public speaking and audience engagement.
Proficient
3 PointsDelivers a clear, mostly engaging presentation with effective public speaking skills.
Developing
2 PointsPresentation is somewhat clear but lacks engagement and effective communication.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to present information clearly, with poor engagement and communication skills.
Reflection and Revision
Evaluates the student’s ability to reflect on and improve their work through feedback.Feedback Integration
Use of feedback to refine the proposal and presentation.
Exemplary
4 PointsProactively integrates constructive feedback and reflexively enhances the proposal and presentation with noticeable improvements.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively uses feedback to improve the proposal and presentation with minor adjustments.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to use feedback for revision, but changes are minimal or lack impact.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to integrate feedback, resulting in little to no improvement in the proposal or presentation.