📚
Created byLinda Garrett
9 views1 downloads

Character UX Lab: Designing Solutions for Tragic Flaws

Grade 11English9 days
★★★★★
4.0 (1 rating)
In this interdisciplinary project, 11th-grade students act as UX designers to deconstruct the internal conflicts and tragic flaws of literary protagonists. By treating characters as 'users' and their psychological obstacles as 'pain points,' students develop digital interventions—such as apps or AI tools—designed to nudge characters toward self-awareness and emotional regulation. The experience culminates in a 'Silicon Soul' pitch and a comprehensive case study where students analyze how their technological solutions would fundamentally reshape the narrative's trajectory and thematic resolution.
UX DesignTragic FlawDesign ThinkingLiterary AnalysisNarrative ArchitectureCharacterizationDigital Intervention
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we design a digital solution that targets a literary protagonist’s internal conflict and tragic flaw to fundamentally reshape their narrative trajectory?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • How does an author utilize literary devices (indirect characterization, foil, and symbolism) to establish a character's internal conflict and tragic flaw?
  • How can we translate a character’s psychological obstacles and behavioral patterns into "user pain points" within a UX design framework?
  • In what ways can a digital interface be designed to nudge a user toward self-awareness and emotional regulation?
  • How would the introduction of a specific technological intervention fundamentally alter the thematic trajectory and resolution of a tragic narrative?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Analyze how an author uses indirect characterization, foils, and symbolism to establish a protagonist’s internal conflict and tragic flaw.
  • Synthesize literary analysis with design thinking by translating character psychology into user personas and "pain points."
  • Evaluate and predict how a specific technological intervention would alter a narrative’s thematic trajectory and resolution.
  • Justify design decisions for a digital solution using specific textual evidence and literary reasoning.
  • Communicate complex thematic and character analyses through a cross-disciplinary medium (UX design and prototyping).

Common Core State Standards (ELA)

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.3
Primary
Analyze the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).Reason: This is the core of the project: students must deconstruct character development and the 'action' of the tragic flaw to redesign it.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.1
Primary
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.Reason: Every UX design choice must be rooted in evidence from the literary text to ensure the solution is 'user-centric' to the character.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.2
Secondary
Determine two or more themes or central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to produce a complex account.Reason: The project asks students to reshape the narrative trajectory, which requires understanding how character flaws drive the central themes.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.11-12.2
Supporting
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.Reason: Students will need to write a rationale or case study explaining how their digital solution addresses the character's internal conflict.

ISTE Standards for Students

ISTE 1.4.a
Supporting
Students use a deliberate design process for generating ideas, testing theories, creating innovative artifacts or solving authentic problems.Reason: Students are applying a UX design framework (a deliberate design process) to solve the 'problem' of a character's tragic trajectory.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

The 'Silicon Soul' Venture Pitch

The classroom is transformed into a high-stakes startup pitch room where a Silicon Valley 'Angel Investor' (the teacher in character) announces a $100M fund for apps that solve 'The Human Condition.' Students must examine a character’s catastrophic Act 5 and brainstorm a 'Disruptive Tech' solution that could have intervened before the tragic flaw led to their downfall.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

User Persona: The Protagonist as Client

Students translate literary analysis into the language of UX Design. By treating a literary character as a 'User,' students identify the character's 'Pain Points' (internal conflicts), 'Motivations' (desires), and 'Barriers' (the tragic flaw). This process humanizes the character through a psychological lens and prepares students to design a solution that addresses specific behavioral triggers.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Translate internal conflicts into 'Pain Points' (e.g., Othello’s pain point is 'Insecurity regarding social status and fidelity').
2. Define the 'User Goal'—what is the character ultimately trying to achieve versus what they actually need?
3. Create a 'User Journey Map' that plots the character’s emotional highs and lows across the narrative arc.
4. Write a 'Problem Statement' from the character's perspective: 'As a [Protagonist], I want to [Goal], but I am hindered by [Tragic Flaw].'

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA professional 'User Persona Profile' for the protagonist, including a 'User Journey Map' that tracks their emotional state throughout the original play or novel.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with RL.11-12.3 (deconstructing character psychology) and ISTE 1.4.a (using a design process to solve authentic problems).
Activity 2

The 'Nudge' Blueprint: Designing the Intervention

In this activity, students brainstorm and wireframe a digital interface (app, wearable tech, or AI) designed specifically to 'nudge' the character away from their tragic flaw. They must think about how specific features—like a notification, a biometric alert, or a cognitive reframing tool—would intervene during the character’s 'Critical Failure Points' identified in Activity 1.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Brainstorm three specific digital 'Interventions' (e.g., an app that detects rising anger levels for Tybalt or a fact-checking AI for Othello).
2. Sketch the primary user interface (UI) of the solution, incorporating symbolism from the text into the design (e.g., using a 'Mirror' motif for a character struggling with vanity).
3. Develop 'Nudge Logic': Explain the trigger (the character’s behavior), the action (the app’s response), and the expected outcome (the behavioral change).

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA set of low-fidelity wireframes (sketches) of the digital solution, including a 'Feature Logic Map' explaining how the tech addresses the flaw.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with ISTE 1.4.a (creating innovative artifacts) and RL.11-12.3 (ordering the action of a story).
Activity 3

Rewriting Destiny: The Narrative Trajectory Shift

Students must now play 'Narrative Architect' and predict how their digital solution would change the story. If the character uses the app, how does the plot shift? How does the resolution change? Crucially, students must analyze how this intervention alters the overall theme of the work—does the play remain a tragedy, or does it become something else entirely?

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Re-plot the 'Catastrophic Act 5' with the digital solution in place. Where does the narrative trajectory deviate from the original?
2. Identify which characters are saved or what conflicts are resolved by the intervention.
3. Analyze the thematic impact: If the character overcomes their flaw through tech, what does the story now say about human nature versus the original message?

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Revised Narrative Flowchart' comparing the original plot to the new 'Disrupted' plot, accompanied by a thematic shift analysis.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with RL.11-12.2 (analyzing how themes interact and build on one another) and RL.11-12.3 (analyzing the impact of author's choices).
Activity 4

The Silicon Soul Rationale: A Case Study in Character UX

For the final portfolio piece, students produce a formal rationale or 'Venture Pitch.' This document serves as the academic backbone of the project, where they use literary theory and textual evidence to justify why their digital solution is the most effective way to 'solve' the character’s internal conflict. It bridges the gap between creative design and rigorous literary analysis.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Draft an introduction that defines the character's internal conflict and the 'Market Need' for an intervention in their specific world.
2. Write a detailed analysis of how the digital solution’s features directly counteract the author’s use of foils and symbolism.
3. Include a 'Textual Evidence Appendix' citing specific quotes that justify every major design decision.
4. Conclude with a reflection on the limitations of technology in solving 'The Human Condition' as presented in the literature.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 2-page 'Solution Rationale & Case Study' that argues for the effectiveness of the design using textual evidence and UX principles.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with W.11-12.2 (writing informative/explanatory texts to convey complex ideas) and RL.11-12.1 (citing strong textual evidence).
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Character UX Lab: Digital Tragedy Intervention Rubric

Category 1

Literary Analysis & Design Thinking Integration

Assesses the student's ability to synthesize literary analysis with UX design principles to create a user-centric profile of a protagonist.
Criterion 1

Character Deconstruction & Persona Mapping

Ability to translate complex literary characterization (indirect characterization, foils, symbolism) into a UX 'User Persona' and 'Journey Map'.

Exemplary
4 Points

Demonstrates a sophisticated deconstruction of the character's internal conflict and tragic flaw, identifying nuanced behavioral patterns and 'pain points' that go beyond the surface plot. The User Journey Map meticulously tracks emotional shifts with high-fidelity literary accuracy.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a thorough analysis of the character’s internal conflict and tragic flaw. Accurately translates character motivations into clear UX pain points. The User Journey Map clearly aligns with the major plot points and emotional arc of the text.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies basic internal conflicts and flaws but may miss the complexity of indirect characterization. The UX translation is inconsistent, and the User Journey Map shows only a partial understanding of the character's emotional arc.

Beginning
1 Points

Shows only a surface-level understanding of the character. Fails to accurately identify the tragic flaw or internal conflict. The User Journey Map is incomplete or lacks a clear connection to the literary text.

Criterion 2

Strategic Intervention & Design Logic

The effectiveness and creativity of the digital solution ('Nudge Logic') in addressing specific 'Critical Failure Points' in the character's narrative trajectory.

Exemplary
4 Points

The design is an innovative, symbolic intervention that directly counters the protagonist's tragic flaw. Features use sophisticated 'Nudge Logic' that feels both technologically plausible and narratively disruptive. UI sketches incorporate meaningful symbolism from the text.

Proficient
3 Points

The digital solution offers a logical and effective intervention for the character’s primary conflict. The Features Logic Map clearly explains how the tech addresses behavioral triggers. UI sketches are clear and relevant to the character's needs.

Developing
2 Points

The digital solution addresses the character's conflict in a generic way. The connection between the character’s specific flaw and the app’s features is weak or inconsistent. UI sketches are basic and lack symbolic depth.

Beginning
1 Points

The proposed solution does not logically address the character's tragic flaw or internal conflict. The intervention is either irrelevant to the narrative or lacks any functional design logic.

Category 2

Narrative Architecture & Theme Evolution

Evaluates how students re-envision the text's resolution and meaning through the lens of their technological disruption.
Criterion 1

Thematic & Narrative Impact Analysis

The ability to predict and analyze how a technological intervention alters the narrative arc and the central themes of the literary work.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a profound analysis of how the intervention shifts the narrative trajectory. Offers a compelling argument regarding how the thematic meaning of the work changes (e.g., from tragedy to something else), critiquing the limitations of technology in the 'human condition.'

Proficient
3 Points

Clearly identifies how the digital solution alters the plot and saves the character from their downfall. Provides a sound analysis of the resulting thematic shift and compares the new trajectory to the original.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some plot changes but the analysis of thematic impact is surface-level or inconsistent. The comparison between the original and 'disrupted' plot lacks detail or logical flow.

Beginning
1 Points

Fails to explain how the intervention would change the story’s outcome. The thematic analysis is missing or demonstrates a misunderstanding of the original text’s central ideas.

Category 3

Synthesis & Professional Communication

Focuses on the student's ability to write a formal justification for their project, rooted in evidence and professional communication standards.
Criterion 1

Evidence-Based Argumentation & Writing Quality

The use of strong, thorough textual evidence to justify design decisions and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a formal case study format.

Exemplary
4 Points

The rationale is a masterfully written case study that uses meticulous, high-quality textual evidence to justify every design choice. The writing is professional, persuasive, and demonstrates an advanced command of both literary and UX terminology.

Proficient
3 Points

The rationale is clear, well-organized, and uses relevant textual evidence to support the design of the digital solution. Effectively explains the 'market need' for the intervention within the world of the text using accurate literary terminology.

Developing
2 Points

The rationale provides some textual evidence, but it is either sparse or not clearly linked to specific design features. The writing is occasionally disorganized or lacks the professional tone required for a case study.

Beginning
1 Points

The rationale lacks sufficient textual evidence to justify the project. The writing is incomplete, unclear, or fails to connect the digital solution back to the original literary analysis.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

How did the process of translating a character’s internal conflict into UX 'pain points' change your understanding of the protagonist’s agency and their tragic flaw?

Text
Required
Question 2

To what extent do you believe technology can truly 'solve' the human flaws depicted in literature, rather than simply suppressing the symptoms of those flaws?

Scale
Required
Question 3

Which aspect of the original text was the most challenging to overcome or 'fix' using your digital design logic?

Multiple choice
Required
Options
The character's deep-seated internal psychology (Indirect Characterization)
The environmental pressures and influence of other characters (Foils)
The symbolic or 'fated' nature of the plot (Symbolism/Thematic Weight)
The inevitable momentum of the story's structure (Plot Order)
Question 4

In your 'Revised Narrative Flowchart,' you likely prevented a catastrophe. Does the story lose its status as a 'great' work of literature when the tragic ending is removed by technology? Explain your reasoning.

Text
Required
Question 5

How has applying a Design Thinking framework (UX design and wireframing) to a literary text changed the way you might approach analyzing complex human behavior in future books or real-world situations?

Text
Required