Civilization Mock Trial: Was the Settlement a Civilization?
Created byCourtney Steigerwald
15 views0 downloads

Civilization Mock Trial: Was the Settlement a Civilization?

Grade 6History1 days
In this project, sixth-grade students act as historical analysts tasked with determining if a newly discovered settlement qualifies as a civilization. Students analyze archaeological evidence, primary and secondary sources, and historical interpretations to build a case for or against the settlement's classification. The project culminates in a mock trial where students present their arguments, fostering critical thinking and a deeper understanding of civilization characteristics and historical analysis.
CivilizationArchaeologyHistorical InterpretationSettlement AnalysisPrimary and Secondary SourcesMock TrialHunter-Gatherer Societies
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.Based on archaeological evidence and historical interpretations, does the newly discovered settlement meet the established criteria to be considered a civilization, and how does our understanding of its characteristics shape its place in history?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • What defines a civilization?
  • How do historians interpret evidence from the past?
  • What are the key differences between hunter-gatherer societies and early agricultural communities?
  • How did agriculture and metallurgy lead to the rise of civilizations?
  • How can we use primary and secondary sources to understand past societies?
  • What criteria should be used to determine if a settlement is a civilization?
  • How do different interpretations of historical evidence affect our understanding of a civilization?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Analyze archaeological evidence to determine societal characteristics.
  • Evaluate historical interpretations to understand different perspectives on civilizations.
  • Compare and contrast hunter-gatherer societies and early agricultural communities.
  • Define the characteristics of a civilization.
  • Interpret primary and secondary sources to reconstruct past societies.
  • Debate whether a settlement meets civilization criteria using evidence.
  • Understand the impact of agriculture and metallurgy on civilization development.

Florida Standards

SS.6.W.1.1
Primary
Use timelines to identify chronological order of historical events.Reason: Students will need to understand the timeline of events to place the settlement in historical context.
SS.6.W.1.2
Primary
Identify terms (decade, century, epoch, era, millennium, BC/BCE, AD/CE) and designations of time periods.Reason: Understanding these terms is crucial for discussing historical periods and timelines related to the settlement.
SS.6.W.1.3
Primary
Interpret primary and secondary sources.Reason: The mock trial will heavily rely on interpreting primary and secondary sources as evidence.
SS.6.W.1.4
Secondary
Describe the methods of historical inquiry and how history relates to the other social sciences.Reason: The project involves historical inquiry to determine if the settlement qualifies as a civilization.
SS.6.W.1.5
Secondary
Describe the roles of historians and recognize varying historical interpretations (historiography).Reason: Students will explore different historical interpretations when evaluating the settlement.
SS.6.W.2.1
Primary
Compare the lifestyles of hunter-gatherers with those of settlers of early agricultural communities.Reason: Understanding the differences between these societies is essential for understanding the development of civilization.
SS.6.W.2.2
Primary
Describe how the developments of agriculture and metallurgy related to settlement, population growth, and the emergence of civilization.Reason: This standard is directly relevant to understanding how the settlement could be considered a civilization.
SS.6.W.2.3
Primary
Identify the characteristics of civilization.Reason: This is the core standard for determining whether the settlement meets the criteria of a civilization.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

Urgent Archaeological Discovery

Students receive an urgent message from a team of archaeologists who have discovered a new settlement. The archaeologists are seeking the students' expertise to determine if the settlement qualifies as a civilization based on the evidence found. This entry event immediately thrusts students into the role of historical analysts and connects directly to the project's core goal of understanding the characteristics of civilization.

The News Report

Students watch a short, fictional news report about the discovery of the settlement, focusing on the debate surrounding its classification as a civilization. The report includes interviews with 'experts' holding differing opinions, prompting students to critically evaluate the information presented and form their own judgments. This relates to student experiences with media and encourages them to think critically about sources of information.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

Settlement Timeline Creation

Students create a timeline of the discovered settlement, placing significant events in chronological order. This helps visualize the settlement's development and its place in history.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research the archaeological findings related to the settlement.
2. Identify key events and developments based on the research.
3. Create a timeline using a digital tool or paper, placing events in chronological order.
4. Add descriptions to each event, providing context and significance.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed timeline of the settlement’s key events, including estimated dates and descriptions.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.6.W.1.1 by creating a timeline of the settlement's key events to understand its historical context.
Activity 2

Historical Time Designation

Students will learn and apply historical terms to categorize the settlement’s timeline. This activity reinforces their understanding of how time periods are designated and helps contextualize the settlement's age and duration.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Review the definitions of historical time terms (decade, century, era, etc.).
2. Examine the settlement's timeline and identify appropriate time period designations for different phases.
3. Annotate the timeline with these designations, explaining why each term applies to the corresponding period.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn annotated timeline that includes designations of time periods (decade, century, etc.) relevant to the settlement's history.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.6.W.1.2 by applying terms like decade, century, and era to the settlement's timeline.
Activity 3

Source Analysis Portfolio

Students analyze both primary and secondary sources related to the settlement to gather evidence and understand different interpretations of its history.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Gather primary sources (e.g., archaeological reports, artifact photos) and secondary sources (e.g., historical analyses, expert opinions) related to the settlement.
2. Analyze each source, summarizing its main points and identifying potential biases or perspectives.
3. Interpret the sources to understand the settlement's characteristics and historical context.
4. Compile the analyses and interpretations into a source analysis portfolio.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA source analysis portfolio, including summaries and interpretations of primary sources (e.g., artifact descriptions, site maps) and secondary sources (e.g., historical articles, expert opinions).

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.6.W.1.3 and SS.6.W.1.4 by analyzing archaeological reports (primary sources) and historical analyses (secondary sources) to understand the settlement.
Activity 4

Comparative Societies Analysis

Students compare the settlement's characteristics (e.g., social structure, economy, technology) with those of hunter-gatherer societies and early agricultural communities to understand its place in the development of civilization.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research the characteristics of hunter-gatherer societies and early agricultural communities.
2. Identify the key characteristics of the discovered settlement based on archaeological evidence.
3. Create a comparative analysis chart, listing the characteristics of each type of society and highlighting their similarities and differences.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative analysis chart that highlights the similarities and differences between the settlement, hunter-gatherer societies, and early agricultural communities.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.6.W.2.1 and SS.6.W.2.2 by comparing the settlement's characteristics with those of hunter-gatherer and early agricultural communities.
Activity 5

Civilization Characteristics Report

Students research the key characteristics of civilization (e.g., organized government, social structure, writing system) and gather evidence from the settlement to determine if these characteristics are present.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research the established characteristics of a civilization.
2. Examine the archaeological evidence from the settlement, looking for evidence of these characteristics.
3. Write a report summarizing the findings, providing evidence to support whether the settlement meets the criteria of a civilization.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn evidence-based report detailing whether the settlement exhibits the characteristics of a civilization, with specific examples from archaeological findings.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.6.W.2.3 by researching and presenting evidence related to the characteristics of civilization found (or not found) in the settlement.
Activity 6

The Mock Trial: Civilization Verdict

Students participate in a mock trial, presenting arguments and evidence to support their position on whether the settlement should be classified as a civilization.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Prepare arguments and gather evidence to support their assigned position (either for or against the settlement being a civilization).
2. Participate in the mock trial, presenting their arguments and cross-examining opposing viewpoints.
3. Write a reflection on the trial process, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of their arguments and what they learned from the experience.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityParticipation in the mock trial, presenting well-researched arguments and evidence, and a written reflection on the trial process and outcome.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCulminates in SS.6.W.1.5 and SS.6.W.2.3 as students use their research and analysis to argue for or against the settlement being classified as a civilization in a mock trial setting.
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Civilization Inquiry Portfolio Rubric

Category 1

Timeline Analysis

Assessment of the Settlement Timeline Creation and Historical Time Designation activities, focusing on timeline accuracy, detail, and the application of historical terms.
Criterion 1

Timeline Accuracy and Detail

Accuracy and completeness of the timeline, including correct dates and detailed descriptions of key events.

Exemplary
4 Points

Timeline is meticulously accurate, comprehensively detailed, and creatively presented, demonstrating a deep understanding of the settlement's historical development.

Proficient
3 Points

Timeline is accurate, well-detailed, and clearly presented, showing a solid understanding of the settlement's historical development.

Developing
2 Points

Timeline contains some inaccuracies or omissions, and descriptions lack detail, indicating a basic understanding of the settlement's historical development.

Beginning
1 Points

Timeline is largely inaccurate, incomplete, and poorly presented, suggesting a limited understanding of the settlement's historical development.

Criterion 2

Historical Term Application

Application of appropriate historical terms (decade, century, era) to the timeline, demonstrating understanding of time period designations.

Exemplary
4 Points

Consistently and accurately applies historical terms with insightful explanations, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of time period designations and their relevance to the settlement.

Proficient
3 Points

Accurately applies historical terms to the timeline with clear explanations, demonstrating a strong understanding of time period designations.

Developing
2 Points

Applies historical terms with some inaccuracies or incomplete explanations, indicating a basic understanding of time period designations.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to apply historical terms correctly or provide adequate explanations, suggesting a limited understanding of time period designations.

Category 2

Comparative and Analytical Skills

Assessment of the Source Analysis Portfolio and Comparative Societies Analysis activities, focusing on the quality of source analysis and the comparative analysis of different types of societies.
Criterion 1

Source Analysis Quality

Quality of source analysis, including summaries, identification of biases, and interpretation of the settlement's characteristics and historical context.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides exceptionally insightful and comprehensive analyses of sources, expertly identifying biases and offering nuanced interpretations of the settlement's characteristics and context.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides thorough and well-reasoned analyses of sources, accurately identifying biases and offering clear interpretations of the settlement's characteristics and context.

Developing
2 Points

Provides basic analyses of sources with some identification of biases and interpretations of the settlement's characteristics, though some aspects may be superficial or incomplete.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides limited or superficial analyses of sources, struggling to identify biases or interpret the settlement's characteristics and context effectively.

Criterion 2

Comparative Societies Analysis

Comparative analysis of the settlement with hunter-gatherer and early agricultural communities, highlighting similarities and differences in social structure, economy, and technology.

Exemplary
4 Points

Demonstrates an exceptionally sophisticated understanding of the nuances between the settlement, hunter-gatherer societies, and early agricultural communities, presenting a comparative analysis that is insightful, thorough, and innovative.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents a clear and comprehensive comparative analysis, accurately highlighting the key similarities and differences between the settlement, hunter-gatherer societies, and early agricultural communities.

Developing
2 Points

Presents a basic comparative analysis, identifying some similarities and differences but lacking depth or detail in the comparison of the settlement with other types of societies.

Beginning
1 Points

Presents a limited or superficial comparative analysis, struggling to identify or explain the similarities and differences between the settlement and other types of societies.

Category 3

Evidence and Argumentation

Assessment of the Civilization Characteristics Report and the Mock Trial: Civilization Verdict activities, focusing on the use of evidence to support claims and the quality of arguments presented in the mock trial.
Criterion 1

Civilization Characteristics Evidence

Evidence-based report detailing whether the settlement exhibits characteristics of a civilization, with specific examples from archaeological findings.

Exemplary
4 Points

Crafts a compelling, evidence-based report that demonstrates a profound understanding of civilization characteristics, supporting claims with specific, insightful examples from archaeological findings, and presenting a nuanced argument.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a well-supported, evidence-based report that clearly articulates whether the settlement exhibits characteristics of a civilization, using specific examples from archaeological findings to justify claims.

Developing
2 Points

Presents a report that attempts to address whether the settlement exhibits characteristics of a civilization, but may lack sufficient evidence or specific examples from archaeological findings to fully support claims.

Beginning
1 Points

Submits a report that inadequately addresses whether the settlement exhibits characteristics of a civilization, providing minimal evidence or irrelevant examples from archaeological findings.

Criterion 2

Mock Trial Performance and Reflection

Presentation of well-researched arguments and evidence in the mock trial, and reflection on the trial process.

Exemplary
4 Points

Delivers an exceptionally persuasive and thoroughly researched presentation in the mock trial, demonstrating mastery of the evidence, and provides a reflective analysis that offers profound insights into the trial process.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents well-researched arguments and evidence effectively in the mock trial, actively participating and demonstrating a solid understanding of the case, and provides a thoughtful reflection on the trial process.

Developing
2 Points

Participates in the mock trial, presenting some arguments and evidence, but may lack thorough research or clear articulation, and provides a superficial or incomplete reflection on the trial process.

Beginning
1 Points

Shows limited participation in the mock trial, struggling to present coherent arguments or relevant evidence, and provides a minimal or irrelevant reflection on the trial process.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

What was the most surprising thing you learned about the characteristics of a civilization during this project?

Text
Required
Question 2

On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being 'not at all' and 5 being 'very confident,' how confident are you in your ability to analyze historical sources and form your own interpretations?

Scale
Required
Question 3

Which role in the mock trial (historian, archaeologist, lawyer, witness) did you find most engaging, and why?

Multiple choice
Required
Options
Historian
Archaeologist
Lawyer
Witness
Question 4

If you could travel back in time to the discovered settlement, what is one question you would ask the inhabitants and why?

Text
Required
Question 5

How did preparing for and participating in the mock trial change your understanding of what it means to classify a society as a 'civilization'?

Text
Required