
Community Clean-Up: 'Need + Passive Infinitive' Practice
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we identify critical clean-up issues in our community and create effective proposals using 'need + passive infinitive' and 'causative get and have' structures, to plan and execute a successful town clean-up campaign?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What are the key issues in our community that require a clean-up, and how can we effectively plan this initiative using English as a tool for communication?
- How can we formulate proposals for a community clean-up campaign using structures like 'need + passive infinitive' and 'causative get and have'?
- In what ways can improving language skills help us contribute to community betterment projects, such as a town clean-up?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will identify and analyze key clean-up issues within their community using standard English language communication skills.
- Students will apply the 'need + passive infinitive' and 'causative get and have' structures to formulate effective proposals for community clean-up campaigns.
- Students will develop English language proficiency through the creation and presentation of proposals, demonstrating improved language mechanics and usage.
- Students will enhance their ability to collaboratively plan and execute community improvement projects using English as a medium of communication.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsBreaking News: The Town's Clean-Up Challenge
The local news station has announced an urgent town-wide clean-up competition. Each student group is tasked to create a compelling proposal using 'causative get and have' and 'need + passive infinitive' structures to win a grant for implementing their plans. This taps into students' desire to innovate and make a tangible community impact, fostering diverse inquiry paths.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Community Problem Detectives
In this activity, students will engage in identifying and analyzing various clean-up issues present in their community. They will work in groups to discuss and list out these challenges, using simple English language structures to ensure clarity and precision.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA written description of identified community clean-up issues, ready for further proposal development.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with B1.1 as students identify community issues and describe them using familiar English structures.Proposal Structure Mapping
Students learn to use 'need + passive infinitive' and 'causative get and have' structures by experimenting with creating sentences related to their identified issues. This activity introduces these structures in context, helping students map out their proposal plans effectively.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA set of sentences using key language structures, forming the foundation of their proposal content.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCovers L2.3 by applying language structures in context, ensuring students understand and can use them effectively.Drafting the Clean-Up Proposal
Students draft their community clean-up proposal, incorporating the refined sentences from the previous activity. The draft focuses on clearly outlining the identified issue, a proposed solution, and the expected community impact.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-structured draft of a community clean-up proposal, ready for feedback and refinement.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with B1.2 as students produce connected text on a familiar community topic. Also aligns with L1.2 for spelling and grammatical accuracy.Polishing and Presenting Proposals
In this final activity, students refine their draft proposals based on peer feedback and prepare to present them as a compelling argument for their clean-up campaign.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA polished and presented community clean-up proposal, demonstrating enhanced language proficiency and communication skills.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMeets L2.3 by enabling students to apply language understanding effectively. Also aligns with B1.2 and L1.2 as students present connected text with proper language mechanics.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioCommunity Clean-Up Proposal Rubric
Content Understanding and Relevance
Assesses the student's ability to identify relevant community issues and apply learned language structures to develop a clear and focused proposal content.Issue Identification
Measures the ability to identify and describe a relevant community clean-up issue using appropriate language structures.
Exemplary
4 PointsIdentifies a highly relevant community issue with comprehensive description using precise language structures.
Proficient
3 PointsIdentifies a relevant community issue with a clear description using appropriate language structures.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies a community issue with a basic description using partially appropriate language structures.
Beginning
1 PointsIdentifies a vague community issue with minimal or incorrect use of language structures.
Use of Language Structures
Evaluates the correct and effective use of 'need + passive infinitive' and 'causative get and have' in proposal content.
Exemplary
4 PointsUtilizes language structures flawlessly and innovatively within context, enhancing proposal quality.
Proficient
3 PointsUses language structures correctly and appropriately within context.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to use language structures with inconsistent accuracy and relevance.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles with language structures, showing minimal understanding and incorrect usage.
Drafting and Organization
Focuses on the clarity, cohesion, and logical flow of the proposal draft, including language mechanics.Proposal Structure
Assesses the proposal's organization, clarity, and completeness following the given template.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a highly organized and coherent proposal draft with exceptional clarity and depth.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents a well-organized proposal draft with clear and logical flow.
Developing
2 PointsDraft displays basic organization with some issues in clarity and logical flow.
Beginning
1 PointsDraft lacks organization and clarity, with disjointed structure.
Grammar and Spelling Accuracy
Evaluates the accuracy of grammar and spelling throughout the proposal content.
Exemplary
4 PointsExhibits flawless grammar and spelling, enhancing overall readability.
Proficient
3 PointsMaintains overall correct grammar and spelling with minor errors.
Developing
2 PointsContains noticeable grammar and spelling errors, affecting clarity.
Beginning
1 PointsFrequent grammar and spelling errors, significantly hindering clarity.
Presentation and Delivery
Assesses the preparation and delivery of the community clean-up proposal presentation.Presentation Skills
Evaluates the effectiveness of proposal delivery, including communication skills and use of presentation aids.
Exemplary
4 PointsDelivers an engaging, clear presentation with strong communication skills and well-integrated aids.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a clear, organized presentation with effective communication and relevant aids.
Developing
2 PointsPresentation is understandable but lacks engagement and effective use of aids.
Beginning
1 PointsPresentation is unclear with minimal communication skills and ineffective use of aids.