Composting Kitchen Waste: A Science Project
Created byPhua Mei
1 views0 downloads

Composting Kitchen Waste: A Science Project

Grade 10Science60 days
3.0 (1 rating)
This project empowers 10th-grade science students to become environmental stewards by transforming kitchen waste into a valuable resource through composting. Students investigate the environmental impacts of food waste, delve into the science of decomposition, and compare different composting methods to select and implement the most suitable one. Throughout the project, they monitor and optimize their composting system, analyze data, and reflect on their learning, promoting sustainable practices and cultivating healthier ecosystems. The final product is a comprehensive portfolio demonstrating their understanding and application of composting principles.
CompostingFood WasteDecompositionEnvironmental ImpactSustainabilityWaste ReductionMicroorganisms
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as environmental stewards, transform our kitchen food waste into a valuable resource that not only minimizes environmental impact but also enriches our understanding of decomposition, promotes sustainable practices, and cultivates healthier ecosystems?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • What are the environmental impacts of food waste?
  • How does composting reduce waste and benefit the environment?
  • What is the science behind decomposition and composting?
  • What are the different methods of composting, and which is best for kitchen waste?
  • How can we monitor and optimize the composting process?
  • How does compost improve soil health and plant growth?
  • How can we effectively communicate the benefits of composting to others?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Students will understand the environmental impacts of food waste.
  • Students will learn the science behind decomposition and composting.
  • Students will be able to monitor and optimize the composting process.
  • Students will learn how compost improves soil health and plant growth.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

The Mystery of the Missing Food

Students arrive to find all the food in the cafeteria is 'missing,' replaced by alarming statistics about food waste. They must investigate where it went and propose a sustainable solution (composting) to prevent future disappearances.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

Waste Audit & Environmental Impact Assessment

Students conduct a thorough audit of their household's kitchen waste over a week to quantify the amount and types of food waste generated. They then research the environmental impacts of food waste in landfills, focusing on greenhouse gas emissions, land usage, and potential water contamination.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Collect and categorize all kitchen food waste (e.g., vegetable scraps, fruit peels, coffee grounds) for one week. Use a weighing scale to measure the amount of each category in grams.
2. Record the data in a detailed log, noting the type and weight of each waste item daily.
3. Research the environmental impacts of food waste, focusing on methane emissions, landfill space, and leachate production.
4. Write a summary report detailing the amount of waste generated and its potential environmental consequences, using properly cited sources.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive waste audit report with data tables, charts, and a detailed analysis of the environmental impact of the student's household food waste.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will understand the environmental impacts of food waste.'
Activity 2

Decomposition Science Deep Dive

Students delve into the science of decomposition by researching the roles of microorganisms (bacteria, fungi) in breaking down organic matter. They will investigate the chemical processes involved (e.g., oxidation, hydrolysis) and the factors that influence decomposition rates (e.g., temperature, moisture, oxygen levels).

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research the different types of microorganisms involved in decomposition (bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes).
2. Investigate the chemical processes (oxidation, hydrolysis) that occur during decomposition.
3. Analyze the factors affecting decomposition rates: temperature, moisture, oxygen levels, and C:N ratio.
4. Create a presentation (slideshow, video, or infographic) explaining the science of decomposition, including diagrams and real-world examples.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed presentation explaining the science behind decomposition, including the roles of microorganisms, chemical processes, and influencing factors.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will learn the science behind decomposition and composting.'
Activity 3

Composting Method Comparison & Selection

Students research different composting methods (e.g., backyard composting, vermicomposting, Bokashi composting) and evaluate their suitability for kitchen waste. They will consider factors such as space requirements, time commitment, odor control, and the types of waste that can be composted. Based on their research, they will select the most appropriate method for their needs and justify their choice.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research at least three different composting methods (backyard composting, vermicomposting, Bokashi composting).
2. Evaluate each method based on space requirements, time commitment, odor control, and suitability for kitchen waste.
3. Compare the methods in a table, highlighting the pros and cons of each.
4. Write a justification for selecting one method, explaining why it is the most suitable for the student's specific context.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative analysis of different composting methods and a written justification for selecting the most appropriate one.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to monitor and optimize the composting process.'
Activity 4

Compost Monitoring & Optimization Experiment

Students set up a small-scale composting system using their chosen method and conduct an experiment to monitor and optimize the composting process. They will track key parameters such as temperature, moisture levels, and pH, and adjust the compost mixture (e.g., adding water, turning the pile) to maintain optimal conditions. They will document their observations and analyze the data to draw conclusions about how to improve the composting process.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Set up a small-scale composting system using the chosen method.
2. Monitor and record temperature, moisture levels, and pH of the compost pile regularly.
3. Adjust the compost mixture (add water, turn the pile) to maintain optimal conditions.
4. Document observations and analyze data to draw conclusions about how to improve the composting process. Write a lab report summarizing the experiment, including methods, results, and conclusions.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA lab report documenting the compost monitoring and optimization experiment, including data tables, graphs, and an analysis of the results.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to monitor and optimize the composting process.' and 'Students will learn how compost improves soil health and plant growth.'
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Kitchen Compost Creation Portfolio Rubric

Category 1

Waste Audit & Environmental Impact

Demonstrates understanding of food waste quantification and its environmental consequences.
Criterion 1

Data Collection & Accuracy

Accuracy and completeness of waste data collection and recording.

Exemplary
4 Points

Meticulously collects and accurately records detailed waste data with precise measurements and comprehensive categorization. Demonstrates excellent attention to detail.

Proficient
3 Points

Collects and accurately records waste data with appropriate measurements and categorization. Minor details may be missing.

Developing
2 Points

Collects and records some waste data, but with inaccuracies or incomplete categorization. Shows some effort but lacks consistency.

Beginning
1 Points

Attempts to collect waste data, but with significant inaccuracies and omissions. Fails to categorize waste effectively.

Criterion 2

Environmental Impact Analysis

Depth and accuracy of environmental impact research and analysis.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the environmental impacts of food waste, including detailed explanations of methane emissions, landfill issues, and leachate production, supported by credible sources.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a thorough analysis of the environmental impacts of food waste, including explanations of methane emissions, landfill issues, and leachate production, supported by sources.

Developing
2 Points

Provides a basic analysis of the environmental impacts of food waste, mentioning some of the key issues, but lacking depth and detail in explanations. Sources may be limited or less credible.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides a superficial or incomplete analysis of the environmental impacts of food waste. Fails to adequately explain key issues or provide supporting evidence.

Category 2

Decomposition Science

Understanding of the scientific principles behind decomposition.
Criterion 1

Scientific Explanation

Clarity and accuracy of explaining the roles of microorganisms and chemical processes.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a clear, accurate, and comprehensive explanation of the roles of various microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes) and chemical processes (oxidation, hydrolysis) in decomposition, using precise scientific terminology and illustrative examples.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a clear and accurate explanation of the roles of microorganisms and chemical processes in decomposition, using appropriate scientific terminology and examples.

Developing
2 Points

Provides a basic explanation of the roles of microorganisms and chemical processes in decomposition, but with some inaccuracies or omissions. May struggle with scientific terminology.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides a vague or inaccurate explanation of the roles of microorganisms and chemical processes in decomposition. Demonstrates limited understanding of the underlying science.

Criterion 2

Factor Analysis

Understanding and explanation of factors affecting decomposition rates.

Exemplary
4 Points

Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the factors affecting decomposition rates (temperature, moisture, oxygen, C:N ratio) by providing detailed explanations of how each factor influences the process, including specific examples and quantitative relationships.

Proficient
3 Points

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the factors affecting decomposition rates (temperature, moisture, oxygen, C:N ratio) by explaining how each factor influences the process.

Developing
2 Points

Demonstrates a basic understanding of some of the factors affecting decomposition rates, but may struggle to explain how each factor influences the process. May omit key factors or provide incomplete explanations.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates a limited understanding of the factors affecting decomposition rates. Fails to adequately explain how these factors influence the decomposition process.

Category 3

Composting Method Comparison

Evaluation and justification of chosen composting method.
Criterion 1

Method Evaluation

Thoroughness and accuracy of comparing different composting methods.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a comprehensive and insightful comparison of at least three composting methods, evaluating each method based on space requirements, time commitment, odor control, suitability for kitchen waste, and other relevant factors. Analysis is supported by research and demonstrates a deep understanding of the pros and cons of each method.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a thorough comparison of at least three composting methods, evaluating each method based on space requirements, time commitment, odor control, and suitability for kitchen waste.

Developing
2 Points

Provides a basic comparison of different composting methods, but the evaluation is superficial or incomplete. May not consider all relevant factors or may include inaccuracies.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides a limited or inaccurate comparison of composting methods. Fails to adequately evaluate the pros and cons of each method.

Criterion 2

Justification

Clarity and logic of justifying the selected composting method.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a compelling and well-reasoned justification for selecting a particular composting method, clearly explaining why it is the most suitable for their specific context, considering factors such as available space, time constraints, waste composition, and environmental concerns. Demonstrates a deep understanding of their own needs and constraints.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a clear and logical justification for selecting a particular composting method, explaining why it is the most suitable for their specific context.

Developing
2 Points

Provides a basic justification for selecting a composting method, but the reasoning is weak or incomplete. May not adequately consider their specific context or constraints.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides a vague or illogical justification for selecting a composting method. Fails to adequately explain their reasoning or consider their specific context.

Category 4

Compost Experiment & Optimization

Practical application of composting principles and data-driven optimization.
Criterion 1

Monitoring & Data Recording

Consistency and accuracy of monitoring and recording compost parameters.

Exemplary
4 Points

Consistently and accurately monitors and records temperature, moisture levels, and pH of the compost pile at regular intervals, using appropriate tools and techniques. Data is meticulously documented and organized in a clear and accessible format.

Proficient
3 Points

Monitors and records temperature, moisture levels, and pH of the compost pile regularly.

Developing
2 Points

Monitors and records some compost parameters, but with inconsistencies or inaccuracies. Data may be incomplete or poorly organized.

Beginning
1 Points

Attempts to monitor compost parameters, but with significant inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Data is largely incomplete or missing.

Criterion 2

Optimization & Analysis

Effectiveness of adjusting compost conditions and analyzing data to improve the process.

Exemplary
4 Points

Effectively adjusts the compost mixture (adding water, turning the pile) based on data collected, demonstrating a proactive and data-driven approach to maintaining optimal conditions. Provides a thorough and insightful analysis of the data, drawing clear and well-supported conclusions about how to improve the composting process.

Proficient
3 Points

Adjusts the compost mixture based on data collected and analyzes data to draw conclusions about how to improve the composting process.

Developing
2 Points

Makes some adjustments to the compost mixture, but the rationale is unclear or inconsistent with the data. Analysis of the data is superficial or incomplete.

Beginning
1 Points

Fails to adequately adjust the compost mixture or analyze the data. Demonstrates a limited understanding of how to optimize the composting process.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

How has your understanding of food waste and its environmental impact changed as a result of this project?

Text
Required
Question 2

What was the most challenging aspect of setting up and maintaining your composting system, and how did you overcome it?

Text
Required
Question 3

To what extent do you agree with the statement: 'Composting is an effective way to reduce environmental impact'?

Scale
Required
Question 4

Which composting method do you think is most feasible for widespread adoption in your community, and why?

Multiple choice
Required
Options
Backyard composting
Vermicomposting
Bokashi composting
Other (please specify)
Question 5

If you were to continue this project, what specific aspects of composting or waste reduction would you explore further?

Text
Required