Conformity & Peer Pressure: What If?
Created byCarmen Soileau
0 views0 downloads

Conformity & Peer Pressure: What If?

Grade 7EnglishArt1 days
In this 7th-grade English and Art project, students explore the pressures of conformity and peer influence through art, literature, and interactive scenarios like a 'Reality TV' simulation. They analyze the consequences and ethical implications of conforming versus not conforming, using critical thinking skills to evaluate these pressures in their own lives. Students create 'Ethical Compass' T-charts to map potential consequences and ethical considerations, ultimately reflecting on how these pressures shape individual identities and choices.
ConformityPeer PressureEthical ImplicationsCritical ThinkingIndividual IdentityMedia LiteracyDecision-Making
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.In what ways do the pressures to conform, as depicted in art and literature, shape individual identities and choices, and how can we use critical thinking to evaluate the ethical implications of these pressures in our own lives?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • How does the desire to fit in influence individual choices and behaviors?
  • In what ways can conformity both benefit and harm individuals and society?
  • How can critical thinking and self-awareness help navigate peer pressure?
  • What are the ethical considerations surrounding conformity and non-conformity in various social contexts?
  • How do different forms of media (e.g., literature, art) portray the complexities of conformity and peer pressure?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Students will analyze examples of conformity and peer pressure in literature and art.
  • Students will evaluate the consequences of conforming and not conforming.
  • Students will apply critical thinking to ethical implications of conformity in real-life contexts.
  • Students will understand how media portrays conformity and peer pressure.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

'Reality TV' Simulation

Students are immersed in a simulated 'reality TV' show where they face challenges designed to test their willingness to conform to group expectations or stand up for their beliefs. This interactive experience allows them to analyze their own behavior and the ethical dilemmas of conformity under pressure.

The Mysterious Case of the Vanishing Opinions

Students arrive to find their classroom strangely devoid of any personal touches or decorations, replaced by bland, uniform items. A video message plays, challenging them to uncover why individuality has disappeared and the potential consequences of such conformity, sparking a debate on the value of unique perspectives.

'The Ripple Effect' Experiment

A seemingly innocuous request is made to the students, such as wearing a specific color or altering their hairstyle for a day. The activity evolves into a school-wide observation of how easily trends spread and the social pressures that drive conformity, prompting reflections on personal choice and societal influence.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

The Ethical Compass: Mapping Consequences

Students will explore the potential consequences—both positive and negative—of conforming and not conforming in the scenarios presented. This activity emphasizes critical thinking and ethical considerations.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Revisit your group's assigned scenario and the list of key moments identified.
2. For each key moment, brainstorm what might happen if the individual(s) involved chose to conform.
3. Then, brainstorm what might happen if they chose not to conform.
4. Consider both short-term and long-term consequences, and note the potential ethical implications of each choice.
5. Create a T-chart for each key moment, labeling one side 'Conform' and the other 'Do Not Conform,' and fill in the potential consequences and ethical considerations.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA series of T-charts mapping the potential consequences and ethical implications of conforming and not conforming in the given scenarios.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Students will evaluate the consequences of conforming and not conforming, and apply critical thinking to ethical implications of conformity in real-life contexts.
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Ethical Compass: Consequences of Conformity Rubric

Category 1

Analysis of Consequences

Evaluation of the depth and breadth of the student's analysis of potential consequences of conforming and not conforming in various scenarios.
Criterion 1

Short-Term Consequences

Assesses the student's ability to identify and describe the immediate outcomes of decisions to conform or not conform.

Exemplary
4 Points

Identifies and comprehensively explains a wide range of immediate consequences, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Connects these consequences to broader social dynamics. Provides nuanced examples. Reason: Demonstrates thorough and insightful analysis.

Proficient
3 Points

Identifies and clearly explains several relevant immediate consequences, demonstrating a good understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Provides clear examples. Reason: Shows effective understanding and application of concepts.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some immediate consequences, but the explanations are simplistic or incomplete. Demonstrates a basic understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Examples may be vague. Reason: Shows emerging understanding but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to identify relevant immediate consequences. Demonstrates a limited understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Lacks clear examples. Reason: Shows initial understanding but needs significant support.

Criterion 2

Long-Term Consequences

Assesses the student's ability to identify and describe the lasting effects of decisions to conform or not conform, demonstrating foresight and critical thinking.

Exemplary
4 Points

Identifies and comprehensively explains a wide range of long-term consequences, demonstrating foresight and a sophisticated understanding of how decisions impact future outcomes and broader societal trends. Provides nuanced and well-reasoned examples. Reason: Demonstrates advanced analytical skills.

Proficient
3 Points

Identifies and clearly explains several relevant long-term consequences, demonstrating a good understanding of how decisions impact future outcomes. Provides clear examples. Reason: Shows effective understanding and application of analytical skills.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some long-term consequences, but the explanations are simplistic or incomplete. Demonstrates a basic understanding of how decisions impact future outcomes. Examples may be vague. Reason: Shows emerging understanding but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to identify relevant long-term consequences. Demonstrates a limited understanding of how decisions impact future outcomes. Lacks clear examples. Reason: Shows initial understanding but needs significant support.

Category 2

Ethical Considerations

Evaluation of the student's ability to recognize and analyze the ethical dimensions of conformity and non-conformity, including values, principles, and moral implications.
Criterion 1

Identification of Ethical Dilemmas

Assesses the student's ability to recognize and clearly articulate the ethical dilemmas present in scenarios involving conformity and non-conformity.

Exemplary
4 Points

Identifies and articulates ethical dilemmas with nuance and sophistication, demonstrating a deep understanding of underlying values, principles, and moral implications. Considers diverse ethical perspectives. Reason: Demonstrates advanced ethical reasoning.

Proficient
3 Points

Identifies and clearly articulates ethical dilemmas, demonstrating a good understanding of underlying values and principles. Reason: Shows effective understanding and application of ethical concepts.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some ethical dilemmas, but the articulation is simplistic or incomplete. Demonstrates a basic understanding of underlying values and principles. Reason: Shows emerging understanding but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to identify relevant ethical dilemmas. Demonstrates a limited understanding of underlying values and principles. Reason: Shows initial understanding but needs significant support.

Criterion 2

Analysis of Ethical Implications

Assesses the student's ability to analyze the ethical implications of choosing to conform or not conform, including potential impacts on individuals and society.

Exemplary
4 Points

Analyzes the ethical implications with depth and insight, considering potential impacts on individuals, society, and the broader ethical landscape. Demonstrates a nuanced understanding of competing values and principles. Reason: Demonstrates exceptional ethical analysis.

Proficient
3 Points

Analyzes the ethical implications clearly and thoughtfully, considering potential impacts on individuals and society. Reason: Shows effective understanding and application of ethical analysis skills.

Developing
2 Points

Presents a basic analysis of the ethical implications, but may overlook some important considerations or provide simplistic explanations. Reason: Shows emerging understanding but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to analyze the ethical implications. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the ethical dimensions of conformity and non-conformity. Reason: Shows initial understanding but needs significant support.

Category 3

Clarity and Organization

Evaluation of the clarity, structure, and overall presentation of the T-charts and accompanying explanations.
Criterion 1

Structure and Format

Assesses the organization and clarity of the T-charts, ensuring they are well-structured and easy to understand.

Exemplary
4 Points

Presents exceptionally well-organized and clear T-charts with a logical structure that enhances understanding. The format is visually appealing and effectively highlights key information. Reason: Demonstrates excellent organizational and presentation skills.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents well-organized and clear T-charts with a logical structure. The format is easy to follow and supports understanding. Reason: Shows effective organizational and presentation skills.

Developing
2 Points

Presents T-charts with some organizational issues that may slightly impede understanding. The format could be improved for clarity. Reason: Shows emerging organizational skills but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Presents poorly organized and unclear T-charts with a confusing structure. The format is difficult to follow. Reason: Shows initial organizational skills but needs significant support.

Criterion 2

Clarity of Explanations

Assesses the clarity and precision of the written explanations accompanying the T-charts.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides exceptionally clear, concise, and precise explanations that demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the concepts. Uses language effectively to convey complex ideas. Reason: Demonstrates excellent communication skills and deep understanding.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides clear and concise explanations that demonstrate a good understanding of the concepts. Uses appropriate language effectively. Reason: Shows effective communication skills and understanding.

Developing
2 Points

Provides explanations that are sometimes unclear or incomplete, indicating a basic understanding of the concepts. Language use could be improved. Reason: Shows emerging communication skills but requires further development.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides explanations that are unclear, confusing, and demonstrate a limited understanding of the concepts. Language use is ineffective. Reason: Shows initial communication skills but needs significant support.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

Reflecting on the 'Ethical Compass' activity, what surprised you most about the potential consequences of conformity and non-conformity in your scenario?

Text
Required
Question 2

To what extent do you think the pressures to conform, as depicted in art and literature, shape individual identities and choices?

Scale
Required
Question 3

In what ways can you apply the critical thinking skills you developed in this activity to navigate real-life situations involving peer pressure and ethical decision-making?

Text
Required