
Create your own test!
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.As third-grade students, how can we develop and ask meaningful questions about a reading passage that enhances our understanding and leads to creating our own test?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What are different types of questions we can ask about a reading passage?
- How can questioning help us understand a text better?
- What makes a question effective or meaningful?
- How can we generate questions that lead to deeper comprehension of a reading passage?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to create their own questions based on a reading passage to demonstrate understanding.
- Students will engage in collaborative discussions using the questions they've generated to explore different interpretations of the text.
- Students will learn to differentiate between various types of questions (e.g., literal, inferential, critical) and understand their roles in reading comprehension.
- Students will improve their ability to discuss and communicate their ideas clearly in a group setting using the questions they have formulated.
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsMystery Box Challenge
Present students with a sealed 'Mystery Box' that contains an object or piece of information related to the reading passage. Students must develop questions to figure out what's inside, fostering curiosity and excitement while connecting to the reading content.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Inquisitive Investigators: Uncovering Passage Details
Students will work in pairs to develop questions aimed at uncovering specific details about a reading passage. This activity encourages students to refer explicitly to the text while formulating their questions, thus enhancing their ability to understand and interpret the reading material.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA set of collaboratively developed questions with explicitly text-based answers, along with a class discussion reflection piece.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsFocuses on CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.3.1, emphasizing asking and answering questions by referring explicitly to the text.The 'Deep Dive' Discussion: Facilitating Textual Engagement
In this activity, students lead a group discussion based on the questions they have developed. This will allow them to practice verbal expression, engage in collaborative discussions, and explore different interpretations of the text in a supportive environment.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA group discussion summary created by student-led conversation, detailing key insights and questions explored from a shared reading passage.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.3.1 by engaging students in collaborative discussions based on text-related questions.Question Type Exploration: Literal, Inferential, and Beyond
In this activity, students will explore different types of questions they can ask about a reading passage. They will categorize questions as literal, inferential, or critical, and practice creating and identifying each type. This foundational skill will serve as a building block for developing meaningful and effective questions.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA categorized list of student-generated questions corresponding to a reading passage, with examples of each type (literal, inferential, critical).Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.3.1, focusing on asking questions to demonstrate understanding.Language Detectives: Enhancing Communication Through Questions
In this activity, students will focus on refining their language skills to effectively communicate questions and answers. They will practice using language conventions and enhancing clarity in both written and spoken forms.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA set of revised questions that demonstrate improved language use, along with peer-reviewed feedback.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.3.3, reinforcing language knowledge in writing, speaking, and listening.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio3rd Grade Reading Comprehension and Questioning Skills
Question Generation
Assesses the student's ability to create questions that demonstrate understanding and reference the text.Text-Based Questions
Ability to create questions that refer explicitly to the text.
Exemplary
4 PointsCrafts sophisticated questions that clearly require explicit textual references, demonstrating deep understanding.
Proficient
3 PointsCreates appropriate questions that generally require textual references, showing thorough understanding.
Developing
2 PointsForms basic questions with occasional text references, showing emerging understanding.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to form questions that reference the text, indicating minimal understanding.
Question Types
Understanding and application of different question types (literal, inferential, critical).
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates mastery by generating insightful questions across all types with clear distinctions.
Proficient
3 PointsGenerates questions across types, showing understanding with some distinction between them.
Developing
2 PointsProduces questions with limited distinction between types, demonstrating basic understanding.
Beginning
1 PointsLimited ability to generate diverse types of questions, showing initial understanding.
Collaborative Discussion
Evaluates the studentβs participation in discussions and ability to express ideas clearly.Engagement in Group Discussion
Active participation and contribution to group discussions.
Exemplary
4 PointsConsistently leads discussions, encourages contributions, and builds on ideas innovatively.
Proficient
3 PointsActively participates and contributes effectively to discussions.
Developing
2 PointsParticipates intermittently with limited contributions.
Beginning
1 PointsParticipates minimally and requires guidance.
Presentation of Ideas
Clarity and coherence in presenting ideas during discussions.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents ideas clearly and coherently, with well-structured arguments and insights.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents ideas clearly and coherently, supporting points appropriately.
Developing
2 PointsPresents ideas with some clarity and coherence, but lacks depth.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to communicate ideas clearly, resulting in misunderstandings.
Language Use and Refinement
Assesses the use of language conventions and improvements in question formation.Language Accuracy
Use of language conventions in question formation.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates flawless use of language conventions in forming questions.
Proficient
3 PointsUtilizes language conventions accurately with minor errors.
Developing
2 PointsUses language conventions inconsistently, with some errors.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles with basic language conventions in forming questions.
Peer Feedback Incorporation
Effectiveness in using peer feedback to improve questions.
Exemplary
4 PointsIncorporates peer feedback expertly to enhance question quality.
Proficient
3 PointsUses peer feedback effectively to improve questions.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to use feedback with limited improvements.
Beginning
1 PointsRarely incorporates feedback, showing minimal improvement.