Deconstructing Conspiracy Theories: Research and Presentation

Created byKris Ayres-Klarer

1 views0 downloads

Deconstructing Conspiracy Theories: Research and Presentation

Grade 7English20 days

The 'Deconstructing Conspiracy Theories: Research and Presentation' project for 7th-grade English focuses on developing critical analysis skills to distinguish fact from fiction in conspiracy theories. Students conduct structured research, evaluate source credibility, organize information for writing informative texts, and present their findings using multimedia tools. This project enhances critical thinking, collaborative discussions, and effective communication through various activities and assessments aligned with Common Core Standards.

Conspiracy TheoriesCritical AnalysisResearch SkillsSource CredibilityInformative WritingMultimedia PresentationCollaborative Discussions

Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.

📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we critically analyze conspiracy theories to distinguish fact from fiction while effectively communicating our findings through writing and presentations?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.

What defines a conspiracy theory, and how do they differ from other types of narratives?
How can we evaluate the credibility of sources when researching conspiracy theories?
What strategies can be applied to organize information and evidence when writing about conspiracy theories?
How do we use precise language and formal tone in informative writing about conspiracy theories?
What role does multimedia play in effectively presenting information and arguments regarding conspiracy theories?
In what ways can adapting speech and style help in presenting information on conspiracy theories in varying contexts?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:

Critically analyze and evaluate conspiracy theories to distinguish fact from fiction.
Conduct structured research using multiple sources to enhance understanding of conspiracy narratives.
Organize and synthesize information gathered from various sources into coherent and well-structured written and oral presentations.
Use precise language, formal tone, and logical structure in writing informative texts about conspiracy theories.
Present research findings on conspiracy theories using multimedia tools effectively to support the presentation's arguments.
Engage in collaborative discussions to build on ideas and enhance understanding of conspiracy theories.
Adapt speech style and delivery to suit different presentation contexts and audiences.

Common Core Standards

W.7.7

Primary

Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation.Reason: The project requires students to conduct research on conspiracy theories, drawing from multiple sources and possibly generating further questions.

W.7.8

Primary

Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.Reason: Students need to gather and evaluate information about conspiracy theories while assessing the credibility of their sources.

W.7.2

Primary

Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas, concepts, and information through the selection, organization, and analysis of relevant content.Reason: Students will write informative texts on conspiracy theories, requiring organized analysis and presentation of information.

SL.7.1

Secondary

Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly.Reason: The project involves collaborative discussions to analyze conspiracy theories and discuss findings.

SL.7.4

Primary

Present claims and findings, emphasizing salient points in a focused, coherent manner with relevant evidence, sound valid reasoning, and well-chosen details.Reason: Students need to present their findings on conspiracy theories clearly and logically, using evidence and valid reasoning.

SL.7.5

Secondary

Include multimedia components and visual displays in presentations to clarify claims and findings and emphasize salient points.Reason: Multimedia elements are essential in the project's presentation portion, making information about conspiracy theories clearer and more engaging.

SL.7.6

Supporting

Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks, demonstrating command of formal English when indicated or appropriate.Reason: Students must present information on conspiracy theories in varying contexts, requiring adaptation of speech and style.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

The Great Moon Landing Debate

Launch the project by playing contrasting videos: one asserting that the moon landing was a hoax and another debunking that claim with scientific evidence. Students will work in teams to research the credibility of these sources and present their findings, simulating an engaging TV debate.

📚

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.

Activity 1

Conspiracy Theory Detective

In this activity, students choose a conspiracy theory to research, aiming to understand its claims, background, and origins. This foundational research sets the stage for critical analysis in later activities.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.

1. Select a conspiracy theory that interests you from a provided list or choose your own.

2. Conduct initial research using available books, articles, and online resources to gather basic information about the theory and its proponents.

3. Create a mind map summarizing the key elements such as the main claim, evidence, notable figures, and variations of the theory.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed mind map of the chosen conspiracy theory, including its main claims and supporting evidence.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with W.7.7 as it involves research drawing on multiple sources.

Activity 2

Enhanced Source Credibility Analyzer

This activity aims to deepen students' understanding of source credibility by incorporating critical thinking and analytical skills. Students engage in a detailed evaluation of sources related to their chosen conspiracy theory, using a comprehensive set of criteria to assess validity and reliability. The activity promotes a nuanced view of information gathering and encourages students to question and analyze the intent and context of their sources.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.

1. Identify three primary sources you have found about your conspiracy theory and note initial impressions on a mind map.

2. Utilize a detailed credibility checklist (including authorship, publication date, evidence, bias, purpose, and publisher credibility) to assess each source.

3. Enhance your mind map by adding layers to represent the credibility factors and connections between findings.

4. Write a reflective paragraph for each source, discussing its overall credibility, potential biases, and how it influences your understanding of the theory.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA multi-layered mind map that visually represents the credibility assessments and reflective portfolio with comprehensive evaluations of the sources.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses W.7.8 by engaging students in evaluating the depth of information, credibility, and sources' impact on research.

Activity 3

Organized Argumentator

This activity involves organizing the gathered information into a cohesive argument that will provide the basis for writing an informative explanatory text.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.

1. List out all the evidence and information gathered about the conspiracy theory.

2. Use a graphic organizer to categorize information into introduction, main arguments, evidence, counter-arguments, and conclusion.

3. Draft an outline of your report, ensuring each section logically follows the previous one.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn organized outline for an informative text on the selected conspiracy theory.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with W.7.2 as students organize and analyze the content for writing.

Activity 4

Persuasive Presenters

Students transform their written reports into multimedia presentations that convey their findings effectively through visuals and technology.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.

1. Convert your written report into a presentation format, using slides or digital storytelling tools.

2. Incorporate multimedia elements like images, videos, and audio clips to support your arguments.

3. Practice your presentation, focusing on clarity, engagement, and the logical flow of information.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA multimedia presentation that clearly presents research findings on a conspiracy theory.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports SL.7.5 by integrating multimedia components in student presentations.

🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Conspiracy Theories Critical Analysis Project Rubric

Category 1

Research and Information Gathering

Evaluates the ability to gather, assess, and organize information from multiple sources about a conspiracy theory.

Criterion 1

Source Selection and Evaluation

Ability to select credible sources and evaluate them for reliability and bias.

Exemplary

4 Points

Selects highly credible and relevant sources, providing detailed evaluation of reliability and bias; demonstrates sophisticated understanding of source context and purpose.

Proficient

3 Points

Selects mostly credible and relevant sources, with clear evaluation of reliability and bias; shows thorough understanding.

Developing

2 Points

Selects sources with some relevance and credibility; evaluation of bias and reliability shows emerging understanding.

Beginning

1 Points

Selects sources with limited relevance and credibility; evaluation lacks depth, with minimal understanding of reliability and bias.

Criterion 2

Information Synthesis and Organization

Ability to synthesize information from various sources and organize it logically.

Exemplary

4 Points

Information from sources is synthesized with exceptional clarity and organized linearly and logically into well-defined categories, enhancing argumentation.

Proficient

3 Points

Information is clearly synthesized and organized logically into categories, supporting clear argument development.

Developing

2 Points

Information synthesis lacks consistency, and organization is somewhat effective but impacts argument clarity.

Beginning

1 Points

Information is poorly synthesized, with little logical organization, hindering coherent argument development.

Category 2

Writing and Argumentation

Assesses the structure, clarity, and depth of written arguments regarding conspiracy theories.

Criterion 1

Argument Structure and Coherence

The structure of arguments and the logical flow between points and evidence.

Exemplary

4 Points

Arguments are structured with exceptional clarity, coherence, and logic; transitions enhance logical progression and argument strength.

Proficient

3 Points

Arguments are structured clearly with logical flow and coherence; transitions generally effective.

Developing

2 Points

Arguments show basic structure with some logical flow; transitions are inconsistent, affecting coherence.

Beginning

1 Points

Arguments lack clear structure and logical flow, with transitions missing or ineffective.

Criterion 2

Use of Language and Style

The use of precise language, formal style, and tone in writing informative texts.

Exemplary

4 Points

Language used is exceptionally precise and sophisticated; style and tone are highly appropriate, enhancing clarity.

Proficient

3 Points

Language is precise and style formal; tone is appropriate, aiding in clear communication.

Developing

2 Points

Language is often imprecise; attempts at formal style and tone are inconsistent, partially affecting clarity.

Beginning

1 Points

Language lacks precision; style and tone are inappropriate or inconsistent, hindering clarity.

Category 3

Presentation and Engagement

Evaluates the use of multimedia and the effectiveness of presenting findings on conspiracy theories.

Criterion 1

Multimedia Integration

The effective integration of multimedia elements to enhance the presentation of information.

Exemplary

4 Points

Multimedia elements are integrated seamlessly, enhancing understanding and engagement significantly.

Proficient

3 Points

Multimedia elements are appropriately integrated, enhancing understanding and engagement.

Developing

2 Points

Multimedia use is basic, with limited impact on understanding and engagement.

Beginning

1 Points

Minimal use of multimedia elements; little to no enhancement of understanding or engagement.

Criterion 2

Presentation Skills and Clarity

The clarity, engagement, and effectiveness of presentation delivery.

Exemplary

4 Points

Presentation is delivered with exceptional clarity and engagement; captivates audience effectively and adapts to context.

Proficient

3 Points

Presentation is clear and engaging, effectively communicating information to the audience.

Developing

2 Points

Presentation is somewhat clear and engaging but inconsistencies affect overall effectiveness.

Beginning

1 Points

Presentation lacks clarity and engagement, with significant issues affecting communication.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning

Question 1

Reflect on your learning journey throughout the project on conspiracy theories. How has your understanding of conspiracy theories changed or deepened during this course?

Text

Required

Question 2

How effective do you feel you were at evaluating the credibility of sources and how did that influence your research findings?

Scale

Required

Question 3

What strategies did you find most useful for organizing and presenting information about conspiracy theories?

Multiple choice

Required

Options

Mind Mapping

Graphic Organizers

Multimedia Presentations

Collaborative Discussions

Question 4

In what ways did multimedia elements enhance your final presentation about a conspiracy theory?

Text

Optional

Question 5

How comfortable do you feel engaging in discussions or debates about conspiracy theories now compared to before the project?

Scale

Required