
Ethical Diagnosis Lab: Simulating Dilemmas in Psychology
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we navigate ethical dilemmas in diagnosing psychological disorders while considering historical changes, diverse etiological perspectives, and the role of diagnostic manuals?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What are ethical considerations when diagnosing psychological disorders?
- How have definitions of psychological disorders evolved over time?
- How do different psychological perspectives explain the etiology of disorders?
- What role do diagnostic manuals play in the classification and diagnosis of psychological disorders?
- What ethical dilemmas can arise from the use of diagnostic labels in psychology?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Explore and understand the historical evolution of psychological disorder definitions to appreciate current diagnostic standards.
- Analyze different psychological perspectives to understand diverse etiologies of disorders.
- Investigate the role of diagnostic manuals in the classification and diagnosis process, considering their limitations and advantages.
- Critically evaluate ethical considerations and dilemmas that arise in diagnosing psychological disorders.
- Develop skills to navigate ethical dilemmas by applying historical knowledge, perspectives, and tools such as diagnostic manuals.
MPA
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsFilm Analysis for Observational Diagnosis
Students will watch selected films that portray characters with psychological disorders. Using these depictions, students will take observational notes and attempt to determine potential diagnoses while considering ethical dilemmas and historical changes in diagnostic criteria.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Diagnostic Manual Deep Dive
Students will investigate the role of diagnostic manuals, focusing on classification categories and specific symptoms.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed report on the chosen diagnostic manual and its role in classification and diagnosis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMPA-3.A–C: Understanding classification categories and use of diagnostic manuals.Ethical Considerations Role-Play
Through role-play, students will navigate ethical dilemmas in diagnosing psychological disorders, applying historical, etiological, and diagnostic manual knowledge.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA series of role-play performances addressing ethical considerations in diagnosis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMPA-3.D: Exploring ethical considerations and dilemmas in diagnosis.Reflective Case Study Analysis
Students will analyze case studies, synthesizing their understanding of historical evolution, etiological perspectives, diagnostic manuals, and ethical considerations.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityComprehensive case study analysis demonstrating integrated understanding of standards.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMPA-1.A/B, MPA-2.A/B, MPA-3.A–D: Integration of standards through case study analysis.Historical Evolution Timeline
Students will create a timeline depicting the historical evolution of psychological disorder definitions to grasp the context and depth of these changes.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed visual timeline showcasing the evolution of a disorder's definition.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMPA-1.A/B: Understanding historical changes in psychological disorder definitions.Etiological Perspectives Presentation
Students will explore and present various psychological perspectives on the etiology of disorders, enhancing their understanding of diverse viewpoints.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative presentation on etiological perspectives of a chosen disorder.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMPA-2.A/B: Understanding diverse etiologies from different psychological perspectives.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioEthical Diagnosis Lab Portfolio Rubric
Understanding Historical Evolution
Assesses the student's ability to trace and contextualize the historical evolution of psychological disorder definitions.Historical Accuracy
The accuracy and depth of historical details included in timelines and analyses.
Exemplary
4 PointsContains a wide range of accurate and comprehensive historical data and demonstrates sophisticated understanding.
Proficient
3 PointsContains accurate and relevant historical information, showing thorough understanding.
Developing
2 PointsDisplays some accurate historical information but with notable gaps or inaccuracies.
Beginning
1 PointsContains minimal or inaccurate historical data, showing limited understanding.
Timeline Presentation
The visual and instructional quality of the timeline or presentation created.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe timeline is visually appealing, well-organized, and highly informative with clear educational value.
Proficient
3 PointsThe timeline is neatly organized and informative, effectively communicating major changes.
Developing
2 PointsThe timeline is somewhat organized but may lack clarity or completeness.
Beginning
1 PointsThe timeline is poorly organized and difficult to follow.
Ethical Considerations and Judgment
Measures the student’s ability to understand and apply ethical considerations in the diagnosis of psychological disorders.Ethical Scenario Analysis
The depth and insight in analyzing ethical dilemmas during diagnosis.
Exemplary
4 PointsExhibits thorough and innovative analysis of ethical scenarios, presenting well-reasoned solutions.
Proficient
3 PointsDelivers thoughtful and comprehensive analysis with appropriate ethical reasoning.
Developing
2 PointsShows basic analysis with limited depth in ethics consideration.
Beginning
1 PointsLacks in-depth analysis or understanding of ethical principles.
Role-Play Execution
The execution and reflection on ethical dilemmas during role-play sessions.
Exemplary
4 PointsPerforms and reflects on role-play with exceptional insight and leadership, showcasing comprehensive ethical understanding.
Proficient
3 PointsEngages actively in role-play and provides solid reflective insights.
Developing
2 PointsParticipates but provides minimal reflective insights.
Beginning
1 PointsShows little engagement or reflective analysis during role-play.
Application of Diagnostic Knowledge
Evaluates the application and understanding of diagnostic manuals and criteria in case studies.Diagnostic Manual Understanding
Depth of understanding and analysis of diagnostic manuals' roles and limitations.
Exemplary
4 PointsShows comprehensive and critical understanding of diagnostic manuals, expertly discussing their roles and limitations.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates solid understanding with clear discussions on the roles and limitations of diagnostic manuals.
Developing
2 PointsDisplays basic understanding with some awareness of diagnostic manuals.
Beginning
1 PointsLimited understanding and misinterpretation of diagnostic manuals’ use.
Case Study Evaluation
The integration of etiological, historical, and ethical insights in the case study analysis.
Exemplary
4 PointsIntegrates extensive historical, etiological, and ethical insights into a cohesive, sophisticated analysis.
Proficient
3 PointsCombines key elements with clarity, showing solid integration of insights.
Developing
2 PointsShows attempt at integration with sporadic clarity.
Beginning
1 PointsLow level of integration and numerous oversight issues.
Communication and Collaboration
Assess students’ ability to present findings and collaborate effectively.Presentation Skills
Effectiveness in conveying information orally and visually during presentations.
Exemplary
4 PointsCommunicates with clarity, precision, and compelling engagement.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents information clearly and confidently.
Developing
2 PointsPresents with noticeable hesitations or lack of visual engagement.
Beginning
1 PointsDifficulties in communication and engagement.
Collaboration Effectiveness
Ability to work collaboratively and respect diverse perspectives.
Exemplary
4 PointsLeads collaborative efforts, integrating diverse perspectives effectively.
Proficient
3 PointsCooperates well, supporting team objectives respectfully.
Developing
2 PointsEngages with peers but with limited effectiveness.
Beginning
1 PointsMinimal contribution or engagement in group settings.