
Exploring Sound and Perception in Literature
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we explore the idea of sound and reality through literature and philosophy, considering how communication happens when no one is there to receive it?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What is the concept of sound and how can it be measured or detected?
- How do philosophers view the relationship between experience, observation, and reality?
- In what ways can communication or messages be interpreted if the 'receiver' is absent?
- How can literary devices help in conveying abstract philosophical ideas?
- How do different perspectives help us understand the nature of reality and perception?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Understand and analyze the concept of sound and its philosophical implications in literature.
- Explore and interpret how philosophers view the relationship between experience, observation, and reality.
- Analyze communication methods, particularly in scenarios where the receiver is absent, and how messages can be interpreted.
- Evaluate how literary devices are used to convey abstract ideas, including philosophical concepts.
- Examine different perspectives to understand reality and perception, particularly in literature.
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Phantom Decibel Debate
Initiate the project with a recorded debate between two scientists arguing whether sound exists without an observer. Students act as judges, equipped with research kits, to investigate and later find evidence to support either side. This encourages critical thinking and understanding scientific argumentation.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Philosophical Perspective Panel
In this activity, students will analyze different philosophical viewpoints on reality and experience, using literature as a primary source. They will compare and contrast these perspectives, honing their ability to articulate and evaluate complex philosophical ideas.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA T-chart with character analyses and an oral presentation given during the panel discussion.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCovers CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.7.6 by analyzing varying points of view.Philosophical Reflections: Research and Writing
Students will conduct research to delve deeper into philosophical questions presented in literature and write essays reflecting their analysis backed by evidence. This allows them to engage with philosophical inquiry while practicing structure in writing.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-structured essay reflecting on philosophical questions supported by evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.7.9 by requiring students to draw evidence from texts for analysis and research.Collaborative Sound Symposium
Students engage in collaborative discussions to explore ideas and perspectives on the nature of sound, reality, and perception. These discussions encourage students to build on each other's ideas and express their thoughts clearly.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA collaborative group discussion summary highlighting key perspectives debated in the symposium.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.7.1 by engaging students in collaborative discussions.Figurative Language Mastery through Philosophy
In this activity, students will explore how literary devices like metaphor and symbolism convey philosophical concepts within texts. This enhances their understanding of figurative language and its role in expressing complex ideas.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA poster or digital presentation demonstrating the use of figurative language in literature.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsConnects to CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.7.5 by focusing on figurative language to express philosophical concepts.Sound and Perception: Textual Evidence Hunt
Students will dive into literary and philosophical texts to explore the concept of sound and reality. They will identify and cite specific textual evidence to support their understanding of how authors convey abstract ideas about sound and perception.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA completed graphic organizer with cited textual evidence and a short reflective paragraph explaining the analysis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.7.1 by requiring students to cite textual evidence.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioELA 7th Grade Philosophical Inquiry Rubric
Understanding and Analysis
Assess students' ability to comprehend and articulate philosophical concepts related to sound, reality, and perception, and to analyze texts critically.Philosophical Concepts Analysis
Evaluate how well students understand and articulate philosophical concepts regarding sound, reality, and perception.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates sophisticated understanding of philosophical concepts and articulates them with clarity and depth.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates thorough understanding of philosophical concepts and articulates them clearly.
Developing
2 PointsShows emerging understanding and can articulate basic concepts with some clarity.
Beginning
1 PointsShows initial understanding with minimal articulation of concepts.
Literary and Philosophical Analysis
Assess students' capability to analyze literary and philosophical texts using appropriate evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides comprehensive analysis supported by insightful and multiple pieces of evidence.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides thorough analysis supported by clear and relevant evidence.
Developing
2 PointsProvides basic analysis with some support from evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to analyze texts and provide supporting evidence.
Communication and Expression
Evaluate the effectiveness of students' written and oral communication, focusing on their expression of philosophical ideas and use of language.Written Communication
Assess the clarity, structure, and insightfulness of students' written work.
Exemplary
4 PointsProduces exceptionally clear, well-structured, and insightful written work.
Proficient
3 PointsProduces clear and well-structured written work that demonstrates understanding.
Developing
2 PointsProduces work that is somewhat clear but lacks structure or depth.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles with clarity and structure in written work.
Oral Presentation
Evaluate how effectively students deliver oral presentations or participate in discussions.
Exemplary
4 PointsDelivers an engaging and insightful oral presentation with clear communication.
Proficient
3 PointsDelivers a clear and informative oral presentation, effectively communicating ideas.
Developing
2 PointsPresentation lacks clarity, but demonstrates some understanding of ideas.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles with presenting ideas clearly and engagingly.
Collaboration and Engagement
Assess students' ability to engage collaboratively and build on others' ideas.Collaborative Participation
Evaluate students' contribution to group discussions and activities, highlighting their ability to engage meaningfully.
Exemplary
4 PointsShows exceptional engagement in group activities, contributing and building on others' ideas meaningfully.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively participates in group activities, contributing clear and relevant ideas.
Developing
2 PointsParticipates in group activities with minimal contribution to idea development.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to engage in group activities, requiring support.