
Firefighter Egg Drop Engineering Challenge
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we apply our understanding of physics and engineering to design a structure that effectively protects an egg when dropped from a great height, and what scientific principles can we use to minimize the impact force?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What are the scientific principles behind impact force and how can they be minimized?
- How can we design a structure to protect a fragile object from a high fall?
- What materials are most effective for absorbing impact and why?
- How does the height of a fall affect the force of impact?
- What role does gravity play in the fall of an object?
- How can understanding physics help us in solving real-world problems?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will understand the principles of impact force and how it can be minimized through design.
- Students will apply their knowledge of forces, motion, and gravity to create a protective structure for an egg.
- Students will develop skills in iterative design and testing to achieve optimal results.
- Students will use scientific reasoning to argue for their design choices based on evidence.
- Students will explore materials' properties to determine which are most effective at absorbing impact.
NGSS
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsAstronaut Eggstronaut Mission
Engage students with a space mission scenario where they are briefed as NASA engineers tasked with devising drop-safe landing gear for egg-shaped test subjects, similar to how they would protect astronaut gear. This scenario adds an exciting layer of space exploration relevance and innovation to the engineering task.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Exploring Forces and Motion
Students will explore the basic principles of forces and motion, focusing on gravity and impact force. This foundational knowledge will prepare them for the engineering tasks ahead.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA science journal entry detailing observations of gravity and force experiments.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with MS-PS2-2 by exploring how forces affect motion.Material Impact Testing
Students will test various materials to determine their effectiveness in absorbing impact. They’ll understand material properties and relate these to real-world applications like car bumpers and packaging.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparison table with analysis of material effectiveness.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with MS-PS2-4, focusing on the role of materials in mitigating impact forces.Egg Drop Design Challenge
Students design their first egg drop contraption using knowledge from previous activities to create a prototype. This activity encourages creativity within scientific boundaries.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityPrototype of an egg drop device with notes on initial test results.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with MS-ETS1-4 by engaging in iterative design and testing.Scientific Argumentation Session
Students will construct and present evidence-based arguments for their final egg drop design, using scientific terms and reasoning to explain their choices.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive presentation backed by scientific reasoning and experimental data.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with MS-ETS1-4 and MS-PS2-4 by requiring evidence-based arguments for engineering decisions.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioEgg Drop Engineering Project Rubric
Scientific Understanding
Evaluates the depth of understanding of scientific principles related to force, motion, gravity, and material properties.Understanding of Forces and Motion
Measures the student’s grasp of core physics concepts necessary to explain the egg drop mechanics.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of forces and motion, correctly applying complex concepts like impact force, Newton’s laws, and gravity in explanations and designs.
Proficient
3 PointsShows a thorough understanding of forces and motion with accurate application of major concepts such as gravity and impact force in explanations and designs.
Developing
2 PointsDisplays basic understanding of forces and motion; applies concepts inconsistently in explanations and designs.
Beginning
1 PointsShows minimal understanding of forces and motion; struggles with basic concept application.
Material Properties Knowledge
Assesses the student's ability to identify and explain the properties of different materials used to absorb impact.
Exemplary
4 PointsComprehensively explains the effectiveness of various materials in comparisons, showing advanced understanding of their properties and real-world applications.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately describes the properties and effectiveness of materials with good understanding of applications.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies basic properties of materials; comparisons and explanations are lacking in depth.
Beginning
1 PointsShows limited ability to identify or explain material properties; explanations are unclear.
Engineering Design Process
Assesses skills in iterative design, testing, and refinement of their egg protection device.Design Iteration
Evaluates the student’s ability to iterate on their design based on testing results and observation.
Exemplary
4 PointsConsistently applies iterative testing and makes insightful adjustments, showing sophisticated problem-solving and innovation.
Proficient
3 PointsApplies iterative testing with effective modifications to design, showing clear problem-solving skills.
Developing
2 PointsEngages in limited design iterations with basic modifications; shows emerging problem-solving skills.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles with design iterations; modifications are minimal and lack strategic problem-solving approaches.
Prototype Construction
Measures the student’s ability to construct a functional and thoughtful prototype.
Exemplary
4 PointsConstructs a highly functional prototype with thoughtful consideration of materials and structural integrity.
Proficient
3 PointsBuilds a functional prototype with appropriate material selection and structure.
Developing
2 PointsConstructs a basic prototype; effectiveness and material selection need improvement.
Beginning
1 PointsPrototype construction is inadequate; lacks functionality and careful material consideration.
Scientific Communication
Evaluates the effectiveness of scientific reasoning in student presentations and arguments.Presentation Skills
Assesses the student’s ability to present their design process and findings clearly and logically.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents findings in a clear, logical, and engaging manner using advanced scientific vocabulary and concepts.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents findings clearly with logical reasoning and appropriate use of scientific vocabulary.
Developing
2 PointsCommunicates findings with some clarity; scientific reasoning and vocabulary need refinement.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to articulate findings clearly; presentation lacks organization and effective scientific reasoning.
Argumentation
Measures the student’s ability to use evidence and reasoning to support their design decisions.
Exemplary
4 PointsConstructs a compelling argument using extensive evidence and nuanced scientific reasoning to justify design choices.
Proficient
3 PointsBuilds a strong argument with substantial evidence and clear scientific reasoning supporting design decisions.
Developing
2 PointsPresents a basic argument with limited evidence; scientific reasoning is simplistic.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to construct a logical argument; evidence and reasoning are sparse.