
Future Peace Treaty Symposium
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as delegates in a post-WWI peace negotiation, propose a treaty that prevents the rise of conditions leading to World War II, while addressing the political, economic, and social consequences that emerged from the aftermath of World War I?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What political, economic, and social conditions emerged from the aftermath of World War I?
- How did the outcomes of World War I contribute to the onset of World War II?
- What were the key issues and objectives at the post-WWI peace talks?
- How might different decisions at the peace talks have changed the course of history?
- In what ways did the peace treaties address or fail to address the root causes of World War I?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze the political, economic, and social aftermath of World War I and its influence on the conditions leading to World War II.
- Develop negotiation and diplomacy skills through role-play as delegates in a post-WWI peace symposium.
- Propose plausible solutions in a peace treaty that addresses the consequences of WWI and prevents future global conflicts.
- Evaluate historical decisions and their impacts by exploring alternative outcomes at the peace talks.
- Understand the role of oppression and discrimination in the context of global conflicts and genocides.
State History Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsEscape Room: Race Against History
The classroom is transformed into a World War I themed escape room where students must solve puzzles related to the geopolitical climate of 1919. Each puzzle leads them to a deeper understanding of the Treaty of Versailles' impact and its unintended consequences, encouraging them to think critically about alternative historical outcomes and peace strategies.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Historical Context Creator
In this activity, students will research and create a comprehensive outline of the geopolitical, economic, and social landscape post-WWI. This helps them understand the conditions that set the stage for WWII, forming a base for their simulated peace negotiations.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed graphic outline showcasing the post-WWI conditions and their link to the onset of WWII.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.9-10.WH.7.4 by explaining how WWI consequences set the WWII stage.Oppression Impact Investigator
Students will investigate how oppression and discrimination catalyzed genocides by delving into case studies of the Armenian genocide and the Jewish Holocaust. This will build understanding required for their treaty negotiations.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comparative analysis report detailing oppression's impact on both genocides.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.9-10.WH.7.5 by analyzing discrimination's link to genocides.WWII Consequence Calibrator
Here, students will explore how WWII devastated countries and led to significant global changes, helping frame the final treaty's preventative measures.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn annotated timeline showing the destructive impacts and aftermath of WWII.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with SS.9-10.WH.7.6 by describing WWII's devastation and global changes.Peace Treaty Draft Designer
Using knowledge from previous activities, students design a draft of a peace treaty that addresses key problems post-WWI, preventing future conflicts.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA draft peace treaty proposing solutions for prevention of global conflicts.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsEncapsulates SS.9-10.WH.7.4, SS.9-10.WH.7.5, and SS.9-10.WH.7.6 by synthesizing understanding into actionable peace proposals.Historical Decision Evaluator
In this reflective activity, students compare their peace treaties to actual historical outcomes, promoting critical evaluation of different decisions long-term impacts.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA reflective essay comparing student treaty drafts with historical outcomes, pondering alternate futures.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports learning goals by evaluating historical decisions and reflecting on their impacts.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioPost-WWI Peace Treaty Simulation Rubric
Historical Analysis and Contextual Understanding
Assessment of students' ability to analyze and synthesize historical data related to the post-WWI period and its impact.Research Depth and Relevance
Quality and completeness of historical research related to the Treaty of Versailles and post-WWI conditions.
Exemplary
4 PointsResearch is thorough, accurately referenced, and provides comprehensive insights into post-WWI conditions with innovative perspectives.
Proficient
3 PointsResearch is complete, mostly accurate, and covers key aspects of post-WWI conditions.
Developing
2 PointsResearch is incomplete or lacks depth, with some relevant aspects of post-WWI conditions missing.
Beginning
1 PointsResearch is minimal or incorrect, providing limited insight into the post-WWI period.
Graphic Outline Quality
Clarity and effectiveness of the graphic outline in summarizing post-WWI political, economic, and social conditions.
Exemplary
4 PointsGraphic outline is highly organized, detailed, and clearly connects the post-WWI conditions to the onset of WWII with creative visuals.
Proficient
3 PointsGraphic outline is organized and detailed, showing clear connections between post-WWI conditions and WWII.
Developing
2 PointsGraphic outline shows some organization, but lacks detail or clear connections to WWII.
Beginning
1 PointsGraphic outline is unclear or incomplete, lacking connection to historical conditions.
Comparative Analysis on Oppression
Effectiveness in analyzing and comparing the Armenian and Jewish genocides in terms of oppression and discrimination.
Exemplary
4 PointsAnalysis is insightful, well-supported with evidence, and offers deep comparisons of genocides regarding oppression.
Proficient
3 PointsAnalysis is clear and evidence-based, effectively comparing genocides.
Developing
2 PointsAnalysis lacks depth or evidence, showing basic comparisons.
Beginning
1 PointsAnalysis is minimal, lacking clarity or comprehensive comparison.
Innovation and Problem-Solving
Evaluation of students' ability to apply critical thinking in proposing innovative, realistic solutions in the treaty.Solution Proposals
Creativity and feasibility of solutions proposed in the peace treaty to address post-WWI issues.
Exemplary
4 PointsProposals are highly innovative, well-researched, and offer realistic and comprehensive solutions to post-WWI issues.
Proficient
3 PointsProposals are thoughtful and feasible, addressing major post-WWI issues.
Developing
2 PointsProposals lack innovation or thorough research but address some post-WWI issues.
Beginning
1 PointsProposals are unrealistic or fail to address post-WWI issues effectively.
Drafted Treaty Quality
Quality and organization of the drafted treaty in terms of language, structure, and adherence to diplomatic protocols.
Exemplary
4 PointsTreaty draft is expertly organized and well-written with diplomatic language, detailing clear, structured clauses addressing all major issues.
Proficient
3 PointsTreaty draft is organized and well-written, with clear clauses addressing most major issues.
Developing
2 PointsTreaty draft lacks organization or clarity in addressing issues.
Beginning
1 PointsTreaty draft is poorly organized and written, with minimal issue coverage.
Critical Reflection and Evaluation
Assessment of reflective thinking in evaluating historical decisions and alternative outcomes.Reflective Analysis
Depth of reflection and critical analysis in comparing student proposals with historical outcomes.
Exemplary
4 PointsReflection is deeply insightful and critical, providing comprehensive evaluation of historical decisions versus student proposals.
Proficient
3 PointsReflection is clear and thoughtful, effectively evaluating historical outcomes.
Developing
2 PointsReflection lacks depth or thorough critical analysis.
Beginning
1 PointsReflection is minimal or superficial, lacking critical comparison.