Global Pulse: Kentucky’s Crisis Response to International Trade Shifts
Created byShannon Mosby
12 views1 downloads

Global Pulse: Kentucky’s Crisis Response to International Trade Shifts

Grade 9Social StudiesEconomics3 days
In this high-stakes simulation, 9th-grade students act as economic consultants tasked with protecting Kentucky’s major industries—including automotive and bourbon—from a sudden international trade crisis. Students analyze market structures and use the four components of GDP to diagnose economic health while mapping the ripple effects of global policy shifts on local labor markets. The project culminates in the "Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint," a professional strategic response plan presented to state leaders to stabilize the economy and ensure long-term industrial profitability.
Kentucky EconomyInternational TradeMarket StructuresGDP AnalysisCrisis ManagementEconomic Consulting
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as economic consultants, design a proactive 'Global Pulse' crisis response plan to ensure Kentucky’s key industries remain stable and profitable amidst shifting international trade policies?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • How do different market structures in Kentucky—from local bourbon distilleries to global automotive plants—influence how companies manage price and production?
  • In what ways do international trade policies and global economic trends ripple down to affect Kentucky’s local businesses and workers?
  • How can we use the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports) to diagnose the current health of Kentucky’s economy?
  • What happens to a state’s economic stability when its primary industries are disrupted by shifts in the global market?
  • How can Kentucky industries design proactive 'crisis responses' to remain competitive and profitable during international trade disputes?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Analyze how various market structures in Kentucky (such as the bourbon and automotive industries) influence production decisions and pricing strategies in response to global competition.
  • Evaluate the specific impacts of international trade policies, such as tariffs or trade agreements, on Kentucky's local labor markets and business profitability.
  • Calculate and interpret the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports) to assess and communicate the current economic health of Kentucky.
  • Design a strategic crisis response plan for a Kentucky-based industry that includes risk mitigation strategies and adaptations to global economic shifts.
  • Synthesize complex economic data and qualitative trends to provide professional-level recommendations as economic consultants.

Kentucky Academic Standards for Social Studies

HS.E.KE.1
Primary
Explain the impact of varying market structures on profit, price and production in Kentucky.Reason: This is a core requirement of the project, as students must analyze how different industry structures (like the automotive oligopoly or bourbon niche markets) react to trade changes.
HS.E.KE.2
Primary
Analyze how national and international trends and policies impact Kentucky’s state and local economies.Reason: The entire project premise is built around responding to international trade policies and global economic trends affecting the local Kentucky economy.
HS.E.KE.3
Primary
Analyze how the four components of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are combined to assess the health of Kentucky’s economy.Reason: Students are required to use the components of GDP as a diagnostic tool within their crisis response plan to measure the economic health of the state.

Common Core State Standards (History/Social Studies)

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.7
Secondary
Integrate quantitative or technical analysis (e.g., charts, research data) with qualitative analysis in print or digital text.Reason: The project requires students to balance economic data (GDP, market metrics) with qualitative descriptions of industry trends and policy impacts.

Common Core State Standards (Writing for History/Social Studies)

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.1
Secondary
Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content.Reason: Students will be writing a crisis response plan which serves as a technical, argumentative document proposing specific economic solutions.

Common Core State Standards (Speaking & Listening)

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.9-10.4
Supporting
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning.Reason: As economic consultants, students will likely need to present their pulse report and crisis plan to stakeholders or peers.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

The Governor’s War Room: 48 Hours to Impact

Students enter a classroom transformed into a high-stakes 'Crisis War Room' where the Governor of Kentucky (via a pre-recorded, realistic video) announces that a sudden international trade embargo has halted all exports of Kentucky’s top three products. Students are immediately handed 'Impact Files' detailing the plummeting GDP projections and must work in teams to identify which local communities will face immediate layoffs by the end of the week.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

The GDP EKG: Diagnosing the Economic Pulse

In the wake of the 'trade embargo' announced in the entry event, students must now quantify the damage. They will use the GDP formula (C + I + G + NX) to create a 'Before and After' diagnostic of Kentucky’s economic health. Students will research actual Kentucky GDP data and then simulate the impact of the trade crisis by adjusting the 'Net Exports' and 'Investment' variables. This allows them to see the mathematical reality of how international trends dictate local prosperity.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Define the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, Net Exports) in the context of Kentucky’s economy.
2. Locate current GDP data for Kentucky using the Bureau of Economic Analysis or state economic reports.
3. Calculate the projected drop in 'Net Exports' based on the trade embargo scenario provided in the Impact Files.
4. Synthesize the data into a 'Diagnostic Dashboard' that highlights which component of GDP is suffering the most.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA "Kentucky GDP Diagnostic Dashboard"—a digital or physical infographic that compares Kentucky’s healthy GDP to the projected 'Crisis GDP' using specific data points.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.3: Analyze how the four components of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are combined to assess the health of Kentucky’s economy. This activity specifically targets the Net Exports (X-M) and Investment (I) components, showing students how a drop in international trade directly shrinks the state's economic footprint.
Activity 2

The Ripple Effect: International Policy Fallout Map

Economic consultants must understand the 'Why' behind the 'What.' In this activity, students trace the ripple effects of international trade policies—such as tariffs, trade agreements, or embargoes—from the global stage down to a specific Kentucky town (e.g., Georgetown for Toyota, Louisville for Ford/Bourbon). They will create a 'Ripple Map' that shows how a decision made in a foreign capital leads to a specific economic consequence in a Kentucky backyard.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Select a specific international trade policy or trend (e.g., a new 25% tariff on aluminum or a trade agreement with the EU).
2. Identify which Kentucky industry relies on that policy or is harmed by it.
3. Trace the 'Ripple Effect': Policy -> Cost of Production -> Price Change -> Local Job Impact/Profit Loss.
4. Annotate your map with qualitative evidence, such as quotes from local news or simulated interviews with business owners.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA "Global-to-Local Ripple Map"—a flow-chart or storyboard that visually connects a specific international policy change to its end result on Kentucky workers and local business profits.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.2: Analyze how national and international trends and policies impact Kentucky’s state and local economies. This activity connects the macro-level international policy (tariffs/embargoes) to the micro-level local impact (layoffs in specific KY counties).
Activity 3

The Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint: Strategic Response

Now that the 'War Room' has the data, it’s time for action. Students will draft their primary deliverable: The Global Pulse Crisis Response Plan. This professional document will propose three specific strategies to stabilize their chosen industry. Strategies might include finding new domestic markets to offset export losses, lobbying for state 'Government Spending' (G) to retrain workers, or adjusting production techniques to lower costs. The plan must be backed by the economic data gathered in the previous three activities.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Identify the three biggest risks facing your industry based on your previous GDP and Ripple Map findings.
2. Brainstorm three 'Intervention Strategies' (one focusing on production, one on market expansion, and one on government/policy support).
3. Write the proposal using professional economic terminology, ensuring every recommendation is linked to a component of GDP or a market structure principle.
4. Include a 'Projected Impact' section that predicts how these steps will stabilize the state’s GDP over the next 12 months.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe "Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint"—a formal 3-5 page strategic proposal outlining a proactive response to the international trade crisis.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.1, HS.E.KE.2, and HS.E.KE.3: This activity requires students to synthesize market structures (pivoting production), international policy (mitigating tariffs), and GDP (stimulating 'G' or 'I' to offset 'NX' losses). It also aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.1 by requiring a written, evidence-based argument.
Activity 4

The Governor’s Briefing: Final War Room Defense

The crisis is at its peak, and the Governor is ready to hear the solutions. In this final activity, teams will transform their written blueprints into a high-stakes 'War Room Briefing.' They must present their crisis response plan to a panel of experts (or the teacher playing the role of the Governor). They must defend their economic logic, explain their GDP projections, and demonstrate why their plan is the best hope for Kentucky’s economic stability.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Distill the 'Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint' into five key talking points that highlight the most critical actions.
2. Create high-impact visual aids that simplify the complex data for the Governor's quick review.
3. Practice the presentation, focusing on 'Economic Logic'—the ability to explain why a production shift will lead to profit stability.
4. Deliver the briefing and participate in a Q&A session to defend the plan's feasibility.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 5-minute "War Room Briefing" (presentation) supported by visual aids (slides, the GDP Dashboard, and the Ripple Map).

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.9-10.4: Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning. This final stage forces students to communicate complex economic concepts to a non-expert audience (the 'Governor').
Activity 5

Industry DNA: The Market Structure Intel Brief

Before solving the crisis, students must understand the 'DNA' of the industries they are protecting. In this activity, student teams (acting as Economic Intelligence Units) will select one of Kentucky's major industries—Automotive, Bourbon/Distilling, or Aerospace—and conduct a deep-dive analysis of its market structure. They will investigate how many firms compete, the barriers to entry, and how much control these companies have over their prices. This foundational knowledge is crucial for predicting how an international trade embargo will hit that specific industry's bottom line.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research your assigned Kentucky industry to identify the major companies and their share of the local market.
2. Determine if the industry operates as a perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, or monopolistic competition based on market characteristics.
3. Analyze historical data to see how this industry typically adjusts its production levels when demand shifts.
4. Create a visual 'Intelligence Card' that summarizes these findings for the Governor’s War Room.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn "Industry Intelligence Card" featuring a visual breakdown of the market structure, a list of major Kentucky employers in that sector, and a "Sensitivity Rating" predicting how easily the industry can change prices or production in a crisis.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.1: Explain the impact of varying market structures on profit, price and production in Kentucky. This activity focuses on identifying the specific market structures (Oligopoly in Automotive, Monopolistic Competition in Bourbon, etc.) and how those structures dictate how firms set prices and production levels during stability versus crisis.
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Global Pulse: Kentucky Industry Crisis Response Rubric

Category 1

Global Pulse: Kentucky Economic Consulting Portfolio

Assesses the student's ability to apply economic concepts to real-world Kentucky industries, synthesize global trade data, and communicate strategic solutions.
Criterion 1

GDP Economic Diagnostics (HS.E.KE.3)

The ability to accurately define, calculate, and interpret the four components of GDP (C, I, G, NX) to diagnose Kentucky's economic health during a trade crisis.

Exemplary
4 Points

Demonstrates sophisticated understanding by accurately quantifying the impact of the trade embargo on all four GDP components. Analysis includes precise 'Before and After' data points and a nuanced explanation of how Net Exports and Investment fluctuations specifically dictate state prosperity.

Proficient
3 Points

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the four GDP components. Accurately calculates the projected drop in Net Exports and links these changes to the overall health of Kentucky’s economy with clear evidence.

Developing
2 Points

Shows emerging understanding of GDP components. Calculations for Net Exports or Investment may contain minor errors, or the connection to Kentucky’s specific economic health is inconsistently applied.

Beginning
1 Points

Shows initial understanding but struggles with GDP definitions or calculations. Failed to connect the trade scenario to specific GDP variables; diagnostic dashboard is incomplete or inaccurate.

Criterion 2

Market Structure Intelligence (HS.E.KE.1)

The ability to identify Kentucky-specific market structures (Oligopoly, Monopolistic Competition, etc.) and analyze how these structures influence pricing, production, and profit during a global shift.

Exemplary
4 Points

Masterfully identifies the industry’s market structure with high-level 'Intelligence Cards.' Provides sophisticated insight into how barriers to entry and firm numbers dictate specific production shifts and pricing power in a crisis.

Proficient
3 Points

Correctly identifies the market structure of a Kentucky industry (e.g., Automotive or Bourbon). Accurately explains how that structure influences how the industry adjusts prices and production levels.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies the market structure but provides a basic or partially incorrect analysis of its characteristics. Struggles to link the market structure to the industry's ability to respond to a crisis.

Beginning
1 Points

Fails to correctly identify the market structure or explains it with significant inaccuracies. Does not demonstrate an understanding of how industry DNA affects economic resilience.

Criterion 3

Global-to-Local Policy Analysis (HS.E.KE.2)

The ability to trace the 'ripple effect' of international trade policies (tariffs, embargoes) from global decision-makers to local Kentucky communities and labor markets.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a nuanced and detailed 'Ripple Map' that traces the flow from global policy to specific Kentucky town impacts. Includes sophisticated qualitative evidence and a deep analysis of labor market consequences.

Proficient
3 Points

Clearly traces the impact of an international trade policy on a specific Kentucky industry and local community. Uses relevant evidence to show the connection between global trends and local job/profit loss.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies a global-to-local connection but the logic is inconsistent or the 'Ripple Map' lacks specific detail regarding the local Kentucky impact or the specific policy.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to connect international policy to local outcomes. The map is disorganized or fails to identify a plausible economic consequence for Kentucky workers.

Criterion 4

Strategic Crisis Response (Blueprint)

The ability to synthesize economic data into a proactive strategic plan that addresses risks through production shifts, market expansion, or policy interventions.

Exemplary
4 Points

Proposes highly innovative and professional strategies that directly address GDP gaps and market structure limitations. Recommendations are backed by exceptional economic logic and precise projected impact data.

Proficient
3 Points

Develops a solid strategic proposal with three distinct intervention strategies. Recommendations are logically linked to economic principles and aim to stabilize the state’s GDP or specific industry profits.

Developing
2 Points

Proposes strategies that are basic or lack direct alignment with the data gathered. The connection between the intervention and the economic stabilization is weak or inconsistent.

Beginning
1 Points

Strategies are unrealistic, unsupported by data, or missing. The proposal does not demonstrate a viable path to economic recovery for the chosen industry.

Criterion 5

Professional Briefing & Argumentation (SL.9-10.4)

The ability to communicate complex economic findings and strategies clearly, logically, and professionally to a non-expert audience (stakeholders/Governor).

Exemplary
4 Points

Delivers a high-impact briefing with outstanding visual aids. Demonstrates leadership during Q&A by defending economic logic with sophisticated evidence and clear, persuasive reasoning.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents information, findings, and evidence clearly and logically. Visual aids (Dashboard/Ripple Map) effectively support the line of reasoning and help the audience follow the plan.

Developing
2 Points

Presentation is generally clear but may lack a logical flow or professional tone. Visual aids are present but do not fully enhance the audience's understanding of the economic crisis.

Beginning
1 Points

The briefing is disorganized or fails to present a clear line of reasoning. Supporting evidence is missing or insufficient to convince the 'Governor' of the plan’s feasibility.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

After acting as an economic consultant, how confident do you feel in using the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports) to diagnose the economic health of Kentucky?

Scale
Required
Question 2

Which component of the Kentucky GDP formula proved most difficult to stabilize when designing your "Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint"?

Multiple choice
Required
Options
Net Exports (X-M): Rebuilding trade relationships during the embargo.
Investment (I): Convincing businesses to expand despite global uncertainty.
Consumption (C): Maintaining local spending when jobs were at risk.
Government Spending (G): Balancing the state budget to provide crisis relief.
Question 3

Based on your "Global-to-Local Ripple Map," describe one specific way an international policy decision (like a tariff or trade agreement) made in a foreign capital can directly change the daily life of a worker in a Kentucky community like Georgetown or Louisville.

Text
Required
Question 4

How did the "Industry DNA" (market structure) of your chosen sector—such as the automotive oligopoly or the bourbon niche market—influence your strategy for price and production? Was it easier or harder for your industry to pivot compared to others?

Text
Required
Question 5

During the "Governor's Briefing," you had to present complex economic data to a non-expert. What was the most challenging part of defending your "Economic Logic," and how did your visual aids (the GDP Dashboard or Ripple Map) help you persuade the Governor?

Text
Required