
Global Pulse: Kentucky’s Crisis Response to International Trade Shifts
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as economic consultants, design a proactive 'Global Pulse' crisis response plan to ensure Kentucky’s key industries remain stable and profitable amidst shifting international trade policies?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How do different market structures in Kentucky—from local bourbon distilleries to global automotive plants—influence how companies manage price and production?
- In what ways do international trade policies and global economic trends ripple down to affect Kentucky’s local businesses and workers?
- How can we use the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports) to diagnose the current health of Kentucky’s economy?
- What happens to a state’s economic stability when its primary industries are disrupted by shifts in the global market?
- How can Kentucky industries design proactive 'crisis responses' to remain competitive and profitable during international trade disputes?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze how various market structures in Kentucky (such as the bourbon and automotive industries) influence production decisions and pricing strategies in response to global competition.
- Evaluate the specific impacts of international trade policies, such as tariffs or trade agreements, on Kentucky's local labor markets and business profitability.
- Calculate and interpret the four components of GDP (Consumption, Investment, Government Spending, and Net Exports) to assess and communicate the current economic health of Kentucky.
- Design a strategic crisis response plan for a Kentucky-based industry that includes risk mitigation strategies and adaptations to global economic shifts.
- Synthesize complex economic data and qualitative trends to provide professional-level recommendations as economic consultants.
Kentucky Academic Standards for Social Studies
Common Core State Standards (History/Social Studies)
Common Core State Standards (Writing for History/Social Studies)
Common Core State Standards (Speaking & Listening)
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Governor’s War Room: 48 Hours to Impact
Students enter a classroom transformed into a high-stakes 'Crisis War Room' where the Governor of Kentucky (via a pre-recorded, realistic video) announces that a sudden international trade embargo has halted all exports of Kentucky’s top three products. Students are immediately handed 'Impact Files' detailing the plummeting GDP projections and must work in teams to identify which local communities will face immediate layoffs by the end of the week.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The GDP EKG: Diagnosing the Economic Pulse
In the wake of the 'trade embargo' announced in the entry event, students must now quantify the damage. They will use the GDP formula (C + I + G + NX) to create a 'Before and After' diagnostic of Kentucky’s economic health. Students will research actual Kentucky GDP data and then simulate the impact of the trade crisis by adjusting the 'Net Exports' and 'Investment' variables. This allows them to see the mathematical reality of how international trends dictate local prosperity.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA "Kentucky GDP Diagnostic Dashboard"—a digital or physical infographic that compares Kentucky’s healthy GDP to the projected 'Crisis GDP' using specific data points.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.3: Analyze how the four components of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are combined to assess the health of Kentucky’s economy. This activity specifically targets the Net Exports (X-M) and Investment (I) components, showing students how a drop in international trade directly shrinks the state's economic footprint.The Ripple Effect: International Policy Fallout Map
Economic consultants must understand the 'Why' behind the 'What.' In this activity, students trace the ripple effects of international trade policies—such as tariffs, trade agreements, or embargoes—from the global stage down to a specific Kentucky town (e.g., Georgetown for Toyota, Louisville for Ford/Bourbon). They will create a 'Ripple Map' that shows how a decision made in a foreign capital leads to a specific economic consequence in a Kentucky backyard.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA "Global-to-Local Ripple Map"—a flow-chart or storyboard that visually connects a specific international policy change to its end result on Kentucky workers and local business profits.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.2: Analyze how national and international trends and policies impact Kentucky’s state and local economies. This activity connects the macro-level international policy (tariffs/embargoes) to the micro-level local impact (layoffs in specific KY counties).The Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint: Strategic Response
Now that the 'War Room' has the data, it’s time for action. Students will draft their primary deliverable: The Global Pulse Crisis Response Plan. This professional document will propose three specific strategies to stabilize their chosen industry. Strategies might include finding new domestic markets to offset export losses, lobbying for state 'Government Spending' (G) to retrain workers, or adjusting production techniques to lower costs. The plan must be backed by the economic data gathered in the previous three activities.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe "Resilient Bluegrass Blueprint"—a formal 3-5 page strategic proposal outlining a proactive response to the international trade crisis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.1, HS.E.KE.2, and HS.E.KE.3: This activity requires students to synthesize market structures (pivoting production), international policy (mitigating tariffs), and GDP (stimulating 'G' or 'I' to offset 'NX' losses). It also aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.1 by requiring a written, evidence-based argument.The Governor’s Briefing: Final War Room Defense
The crisis is at its peak, and the Governor is ready to hear the solutions. In this final activity, teams will transform their written blueprints into a high-stakes 'War Room Briefing.' They must present their crisis response plan to a panel of experts (or the teacher playing the role of the Governor). They must defend their economic logic, explain their GDP projections, and demonstrate why their plan is the best hope for Kentucky’s economic stability.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 5-minute "War Room Briefing" (presentation) supported by visual aids (slides, the GDP Dashboard, and the Ripple Map).Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.9-10.4: Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning. This final stage forces students to communicate complex economic concepts to a non-expert audience (the 'Governor').Industry DNA: The Market Structure Intel Brief
Before solving the crisis, students must understand the 'DNA' of the industries they are protecting. In this activity, student teams (acting as Economic Intelligence Units) will select one of Kentucky's major industries—Automotive, Bourbon/Distilling, or Aerospace—and conduct a deep-dive analysis of its market structure. They will investigate how many firms compete, the barriers to entry, and how much control these companies have over their prices. This foundational knowledge is crucial for predicting how an international trade embargo will hit that specific industry's bottom line.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn "Industry Intelligence Card" featuring a visual breakdown of the market structure, a list of major Kentucky employers in that sector, and a "Sensitivity Rating" predicting how easily the industry can change prices or production in a crisis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.E.KE.1: Explain the impact of varying market structures on profit, price and production in Kentucky. This activity focuses on identifying the specific market structures (Oligopoly in Automotive, Monopolistic Competition in Bourbon, etc.) and how those structures dictate how firms set prices and production levels during stability versus crisis.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioGlobal Pulse: Kentucky Industry Crisis Response Rubric
Global Pulse: Kentucky Economic Consulting Portfolio
Assesses the student's ability to apply economic concepts to real-world Kentucky industries, synthesize global trade data, and communicate strategic solutions.GDP Economic Diagnostics (HS.E.KE.3)
The ability to accurately define, calculate, and interpret the four components of GDP (C, I, G, NX) to diagnose Kentucky's economic health during a trade crisis.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates sophisticated understanding by accurately quantifying the impact of the trade embargo on all four GDP components. Analysis includes precise 'Before and After' data points and a nuanced explanation of how Net Exports and Investment fluctuations specifically dictate state prosperity.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates a thorough understanding of the four GDP components. Accurately calculates the projected drop in Net Exports and links these changes to the overall health of Kentucky’s economy with clear evidence.
Developing
2 PointsShows emerging understanding of GDP components. Calculations for Net Exports or Investment may contain minor errors, or the connection to Kentucky’s specific economic health is inconsistently applied.
Beginning
1 PointsShows initial understanding but struggles with GDP definitions or calculations. Failed to connect the trade scenario to specific GDP variables; diagnostic dashboard is incomplete or inaccurate.
Market Structure Intelligence (HS.E.KE.1)
The ability to identify Kentucky-specific market structures (Oligopoly, Monopolistic Competition, etc.) and analyze how these structures influence pricing, production, and profit during a global shift.
Exemplary
4 PointsMasterfully identifies the industry’s market structure with high-level 'Intelligence Cards.' Provides sophisticated insight into how barriers to entry and firm numbers dictate specific production shifts and pricing power in a crisis.
Proficient
3 PointsCorrectly identifies the market structure of a Kentucky industry (e.g., Automotive or Bourbon). Accurately explains how that structure influences how the industry adjusts prices and production levels.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies the market structure but provides a basic or partially incorrect analysis of its characteristics. Struggles to link the market structure to the industry's ability to respond to a crisis.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to correctly identify the market structure or explains it with significant inaccuracies. Does not demonstrate an understanding of how industry DNA affects economic resilience.
Global-to-Local Policy Analysis (HS.E.KE.2)
The ability to trace the 'ripple effect' of international trade policies (tariffs, embargoes) from global decision-makers to local Kentucky communities and labor markets.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a nuanced and detailed 'Ripple Map' that traces the flow from global policy to specific Kentucky town impacts. Includes sophisticated qualitative evidence and a deep analysis of labor market consequences.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly traces the impact of an international trade policy on a specific Kentucky industry and local community. Uses relevant evidence to show the connection between global trends and local job/profit loss.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies a global-to-local connection but the logic is inconsistent or the 'Ripple Map' lacks specific detail regarding the local Kentucky impact or the specific policy.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to connect international policy to local outcomes. The map is disorganized or fails to identify a plausible economic consequence for Kentucky workers.
Strategic Crisis Response (Blueprint)
The ability to synthesize economic data into a proactive strategic plan that addresses risks through production shifts, market expansion, or policy interventions.
Exemplary
4 PointsProposes highly innovative and professional strategies that directly address GDP gaps and market structure limitations. Recommendations are backed by exceptional economic logic and precise projected impact data.
Proficient
3 PointsDevelops a solid strategic proposal with three distinct intervention strategies. Recommendations are logically linked to economic principles and aim to stabilize the state’s GDP or specific industry profits.
Developing
2 PointsProposes strategies that are basic or lack direct alignment with the data gathered. The connection between the intervention and the economic stabilization is weak or inconsistent.
Beginning
1 PointsStrategies are unrealistic, unsupported by data, or missing. The proposal does not demonstrate a viable path to economic recovery for the chosen industry.
Professional Briefing & Argumentation (SL.9-10.4)
The ability to communicate complex economic findings and strategies clearly, logically, and professionally to a non-expert audience (stakeholders/Governor).
Exemplary
4 PointsDelivers a high-impact briefing with outstanding visual aids. Demonstrates leadership during Q&A by defending economic logic with sophisticated evidence and clear, persuasive reasoning.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents information, findings, and evidence clearly and logically. Visual aids (Dashboard/Ripple Map) effectively support the line of reasoning and help the audience follow the plan.
Developing
2 PointsPresentation is generally clear but may lack a logical flow or professional tone. Visual aids are present but do not fully enhance the audience's understanding of the economic crisis.
Beginning
1 PointsThe briefing is disorganized or fails to present a clear line of reasoning. Supporting evidence is missing or insufficient to convince the 'Governor' of the plan’s feasibility.