
JFK's Leadership: Cuban Missile Crisis Impact
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How did John F Kennedy's presidency and the Cuban Missile Crisis shape the Cold War dynamics and influence contemporary international relations?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How did John F Kennedy's presidency influence the course of the Cold War?
- What were the immediate and long-term impacts of the Cuban Missile Crisis on international relations?
- In what ways did JFK's flexible response strategy differ from previous U.S. military policies?
- How did the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis reflect the broader context of Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union?
- Why is the Cuban Missile Crisis considered a crucial moment in the history of U.S. foreign policy?
- What role did communication and diplomacy play in the resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis?
- How did the Cuban Missile Crisis influence future American and Soviet policies towards nuclear arms control?
- What was the significance of the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and how did it change the trajectory of the Cold War?
- How did the Cuban Missile Crisis affect public perception of nuclear threats in the United States?
- What lessons were learned from the Cuban Missile Crisis that apply to modern-day international relations and conflict resolution?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Understand the impact of John F Kennedy's presidency on the direction and policies of the United States during the Cold War, particularly through the lens of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
- Critically analyze the Cuban Missile Crisis and its implications for international diplomacy and nuclear arms control.
- Evaluate JFK's flexible response strategy and its departure from previous U.S. military policies during the Cold War.
- Investigate the influence of the Cuban Missile Crisis in the evolution of U.S. and Soviet relations and its enduring effects on contemporary international relations.
AP US History Key Concepts
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsNuclear Diplomacy Simulation
Students engage in a simulation of international diplomacy where they must navigate nuclear arms treaties and crises, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis. Working in teams, they represent different countries, negotiating peace while ensuring national security, giving them a real-world perspective on the challenges of leadership.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Cuban Missile Crisis Chronology
Students will create a detailed timeline of the Cuban Missile Crisis events to understand the sequence and implications of decisions made by world leaders.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn annotated timeline illustrating the progression and resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCovers KC-8.1.II.A by focusing on the Cuban Missile Crisis as a pivotal moment in Cold War history.Flexible Response Strategy Analysis
Students write an analytical report comparing JFK's flexible response strategy with previous U.S. military policies during the Cold War.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA written report examining the nuances and impacts of JFK's flexible response strategy.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports KC-8.1-I.A by critically analyzing the departure of JFK’s strategies from former policies.Bay of Pigs Reflection Essay
In this activity, students reflect on the implications of the Bay of Pigs Invasion on U.S. foreign policy and Cold War perceptions.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA reflective essay on the Bay of Pigs Invasion, examining its influence on Cold War dynamics.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with KC-8.1.III.C by evaluating JFK’s impact through the Bay of Pigs event.Nuclear Diplomacy Conference
A culmination activity where students engage in a conference simulation to negotiate nuclear arms treaties, inspired by the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA mock treaty and reflections on the negotiation process, simulating diplomacy during the Cold War.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsReflects KC-8.1.II.A, highlighting the diplomacy and psychological brinkmanship of the Cold War era.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioAP US History Cold War Portfolio Assessment Rubric
Historical Accuracy and Understanding
Assessment of the student's ability to accurately describe historical events and understand their significance.Event Chronology
Assessment of the accurate sequencing of events during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Mastery
4 PointsAll events are precisely ordered and contextualized within the broader scope of the Cold War.
Approaching
3 PointsMost events are ordered correctly with minor errors, showing a clear understanding of their significance.
In Progress
2 PointsSome events are correctly ordered, but with notable inaccuracies affecting understanding.
Beginning
1 PointsLittle to no correct sequencing of events, indicating a lack of understanding about the chronology.
Historical Contextualization
Evaluation of the student's ability to place events within the broader Cold War context.
Mastery
4 PointsDemonstrates a profound ability to integrate event details with overarching Cold War themes.
Approaching
3 PointsEffectively contextualizes events with minor omissions, indicating a solid grasp of Cold War dynamics.
In Progress
2 PointsProvides basic contextualization with several inaccuracies or oversimplifications.
Beginning
1 PointsOffers little to no relevant contextualization of historical events.
Critical Analysis and Synthesis
Evaluation of the student's analytical skills in comparing strategies and reflecting on historical outcomes.Analysis of Policies
Assessment of the student's ability to compare JFK's flexible response strategy with previous policies.
Mastery
4 PointsProvides insightful comparisons and critiques with comprehensive supporting evidence.
Approaching
3 PointsOffers a thorough analysis with adequate supporting evidence, showing clear comparative insights.
In Progress
2 PointsAttempts analysis with limited detail and insufficient evidence, indicating a need for deeper insight.
Beginning
1 PointsMinimal analysis and very limited comparison between policies, poorly supported by evidence.
Synthesis and Reflection
Evaluation of the student's ability to reflect on historical events and their implications.
Mastery
4 PointsProvides sophisticated reflections connecting historical events to present-day issues, with strong conclusions.
Approaching
3 PointsOffers well-structured reflections, showing clear connections though some conclusions could be expanded.
In Progress
2 PointsPresents basic reflections with superficial connections to current issues, lacking detailed explanation.
Beginning
1 PointsLimited reflection with minimal connections to contemporary relevance.
Communication and Collaboration
Assessment of the student's ability to communicate effectively and collaborate within group activities or simulations.Effective Communication
Evaluation of clarity and effectiveness in presenting historical analysis and negotiation outcomes.
Mastery
4 PointsCommunicates ideas with exceptional clarity and coherency in both verbal and written forms.
Approaching
3 PointsCommunicates ideas clearly with well-organized argumentation, though some areas could be more detailed.
In Progress
2 PointsPresents ideas with basic clarity, but lacks organization or depth in communication.
Beginning
1 PointsCommunicates with significant difficulty in conveying clear ideas or arguments.
Collaboration and Contribution
Assessment of the student's participation and contribution to group activities such as the Nuclear Diplomacy Simulation.
Mastery
4 PointsLeads and contributes meaningfully in group settings, fostering collaboration and collective problem-solving.
Approaching
3 PointsActively participates in group discussions and contributes constructively to activities.
In Progress
2 PointsParticipates in group activities with limited contributions or engagement.
Beginning
1 PointsShows minimal or hesitant participation in group activities.