
Mapping Inequality: Analyzing Social Disparities in Milan
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.In che modo possiamo analizzare e affrontare le disuguaglianze sociali a Milano, considerando le loro cause, manifestazioni e le risorse disponibili, per sviluppare proposte concrete che riducano il divario sociale tra i diversi quartieri?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- Quali sono le principali cause delle disuguaglianze sociali a Milano?
- Come si manifestano le disuguaglianze sociali nei diversi quartieri di Milano?
- Quali sono le risorse e i servizi disponibili per affrontare le disuguaglianze sociali a Milano?
- Quali proposte concrete possono essere sviluppate per ridurre il divario sociale a Milano?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze the causes and manifestations of social inequalities in Milan.
- Map available resources and services to address social inequalities.
- Develop concrete proposals to reduce the social gap between different neighborhoods in Milan.
- Promote dialogue among students and across different subject areas using phenomenon-based learning.
- Conduct research using data to support analysis and proposals related to social inequalities in Milan
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsA Day in Someone Else's Shoes
Students participate in a role-playing simulation where they are assigned different socioeconomic profiles and navigate everyday scenarios (finding housing, accessing healthcare). This experiential activity fosters empathy and reveals systemic barriers.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Neighborhood Navigator: Inequality Identification
Students will form research teams and select a specific neighborhood in Milan to investigate. Each team will conduct preliminary research on the socioeconomic indicators of their chosen neighborhood, focusing on identifying key areas of inequality (e.g., income, education, healthcare access).Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed research proposal outlining the neighborhood to be studied, the specific inequalities to be investigated, and the research methods to be employed.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsLearning Goal: Analyze the causes and manifestations of social inequalities in Milan; Standard: Promote dialogue among studentsData Detective: Uncovering Inequality
Students will collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative data related to social inequalities in their selected neighborhood. This includes gathering statistical data on income, education, employment, and health, as well as conducting interviews with residents and community leaders to understand their lived experiences.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive data portfolio containing statistical data, interview transcripts, and a preliminary analysis of the collected data, highlighting key trends and patterns related to social inequalities.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsLearning Goal: Conduct research using data to support analysis and proposals related to social inequalities in Milan; Standard: Promote dialogue among students across different subject areasResource Ranger: Mapping Solutions
Students will identify and map available resources and services in their selected neighborhood that aim to address social inequalities. This includes identifying local NGOs, community centers, government programs, and other initiatives, and assessing their effectiveness in addressing the identified inequalities.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA resource map and directory that identifies and describes available resources and services in the neighborhood, along with an evaluation of their effectiveness.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsLearning Goal: Map available resources and services to address social inequalities; Standard: Promote dialogue among students and across different subject areas using phenomenon-based learning.Solution Architect: Bridging the Gap
Based on their research and analysis, students will develop concrete proposals to reduce the social gap between different neighborhoods in Milan. These proposals should be evidence-based, feasible, and address the specific inequalities identified in their selected neighborhood. Proposals may include policy recommendations, community-based interventions, or innovative solutions.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed proposal outlining specific strategies to reduce social inequalities in the selected neighborhood, including a budget, timeline, and evaluation plan.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsLearning Goal: Develop concrete proposals to reduce the social gap between different neighborhoods in Milan; Standard: Ottenere un dialogo tra gli studenti e tra le materie coinvolte, usando il phenomenon based learningRubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioNeighborhood Navigator: Inequality Identification - Rubric
Research Proposal Quality
Assesses the quality and completeness of the research proposal, including the clarity of the research question, the appropriateness of the research methods, and the consideration of feasibility and ethical issues.Research Question & Problem Statement Clarity
Clarity and focus of the research question and problem statement.
Beginning
1 PointsThe research proposal lacks a clear research question or problem statement. The objectives are vague and unfocused.
Developing
2 PointsThe research proposal presents a somewhat clear research question and problem statement but lacks depth and precision. The objectives are general but could be more focused.
Proficient
3 PointsThe research proposal presents a clear and well-defined research question and problem statement. The objectives are specific and aligned with the research focus.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe research proposal presents a compelling and insightful research question and problem statement that demonstrates a deep understanding of the issue. The objectives are highly specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
Research Methods & Data Sources
Thoroughness and appropriateness of the proposed research methods and data sources.
Beginning
1 PointsThe research proposal suggests inappropriate or insufficient research methods and data sources. There is a lack of justification for the chosen approach.
Developing
2 PointsThe research proposal includes research methods and data sources that are somewhat appropriate, but there are gaps in the justification or the methods are not fully aligned with the research question.
Proficient
3 PointsThe research proposal includes appropriate research methods and data sources that are adequately justified. The methods are aligned with the research question and problem statement.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe research proposal presents innovative and highly appropriate research methods and data sources that are thoroughly justified. The methods are strategically aligned with the research question and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of research design.
Feasibility & Ethical Considerations
Feasibility and ethical considerations of the proposed research.
Beginning
1 PointsThe research proposal shows little to no consideration of feasibility or ethical issues. There are significant concerns about the practicality or ethical implications of the proposed research.
Developing
2 PointsThe research proposal addresses feasibility and ethical considerations superficially. There are some potential concerns that are not adequately addressed.
Proficient
3 PointsThe research proposal demonstrates a good understanding of the feasibility and ethical considerations involved in the research. Potential challenges are identified and addressed appropriately.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe research proposal demonstrates exceptional foresight regarding feasibility and ethical considerations. The proposal proactively addresses potential challenges and includes a comprehensive plan for mitigating ethical risks.