Mars One: A 4th Grade Quest to Colonize Mars
Created byKrysta K
1 views0 downloads

Mars One: A 4th Grade Quest to Colonize Mars

Grade 4ScienceEnglishMath25 days
In this project, 4th-grade students become interdisciplinary experts to evaluate the Mars One plan for human colonization. They research essential resources, design sustainable habitats using mathematical ratios, analyze health challenges, and consider psychological and social factors. Students also assess existing technologies, propose innovations, and use scientific methods to evaluate the plan's habitability, culminating in a persuasive presentation to experts.
Mars ColonizationHabitat DesignResource ManagementPlanetary HabitabilityTechnology InnovationInterdisciplinary Research
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as 4th-grade WGES QUEST learners acting as interdisciplinary experts, evaluate the Mars One plan for sustained human presence on Mars, addressing overlooked vital information related to resources, habitat design, health, psychology, technology, and evidence-based habitability, and then persuade experts of our findings?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • What are the essential resources for human survival on Earth and how might those differ on Mars?
  • How can we use mathematical ratios and scaling to design sustainable habitats for a specific number of colonists?
  • In what ways does the extreme environment of Mars (e.g., temperature, radiation, atmosphere) pose challenges to human physical and mental health?
  • What are the key psychological and social considerations for a small, isolated colony on Mars, and how can we design systems to promote well-being and prevent conflict?
  • How can we use persuasive writing and visual communication to present our findings and recommendations to a panel of experts?
  • What existing technologies could be adapted or improved to address the challenges of living on Mars, and what new innovations are needed?
  • How do scientists use evidence to support claims about the habitability of other planets, and how can we apply those methods to evaluate the Mars One plan?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Students will be able to research and identify the resources necessary for human survival on Mars.
  • Students will be able to apply mathematical ratios and scaling to design sustainable habitats for a specific number of colonists.
  • Students will be able to analyze the challenges posed by the Martian environment to human physical and mental health.
  • Students will be able to evaluate psychological and social considerations for a small, isolated colony on Mars and propose solutions to promote well-being.
  • Students will be able to use persuasive writing and visual communication to present findings and recommendations to experts.
  • Students will be able to assess existing technologies and propose innovations needed for living on Mars.
  • Students will be able to apply scientific methods to evaluate the habitability of Mars and the Mars One plan.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

'Martian Survival Kit Challenge'

Each student receives a limited set of everyday items and must justify how these could be adapted for survival on Mars, considering the planet's unique conditions. This hands-on activity introduces resourcefulness and connects to the project's problem-solving focus.

'Dear Earth' - A Colonist's Plea

Students read a fictional letter from a Mars One colonist detailing unexpected hardships and asking for specific help from Earth. This personal narrative encourages empathy and identifies key areas where the Mars One plan might be lacking.

The 'Failed Mission' Simulation

Students participate in a brief simulation of a Mars mission that encounters a critical, unforeseen obstacle (e.g., radiation spike, equipment malfunction). They must brainstorm immediate solutions, highlighting the importance of adaptability and thorough planning.

'Martian Time Capsule' Debate

Students are tasked with selecting five items to include in a time capsule representing Earth culture for future Martian colonists, justifying each choice based on its practical or psychological value. This activity encourages critical thinking about human needs and cultural adaptation in a new environment.

The Mysterious Radio Signal from Mars

Students receive a garbled audio transmission, supposedly from Mars One, hinting at an unforeseen problem. Analyzing the signal (using sound editing software or a provided transcript) sparks inquiry into potential challenges of Martian colonization and verifies student interest.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

Resource Reconnaissance: The Martian Essentials

Students embark on a research mission to identify the critical resources necessary for human survival on Mars. This activity focuses on understanding basic needs and how they translate to the Martian environment.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Brainstorm a list of essential resources for human survival on Earth (e.g., water, food, air, shelter, energy).
2. Research the availability of these resources on Mars, noting any differences or challenges in obtaining them.
3. Create a 'Martian Resource Inventory' detailing the resources, their availability, methods for acquisition/production, and potential substitutes.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed 'Martian Resource Inventory' presented as a report or infographic.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to research and identify the resources necessary for human survival on Mars.'
Activity 2

Habitat Harmony: Martian Home Design

Students apply mathematical ratios and scaling to design sustainable habitats for a specific number of colonists. This activity emphasizes spatial reasoning and resource management within a confined environment.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Determine the space requirements per colonist for living, working, and recreational activities.
2. Use ratios and scaling to calculate the total area and volume needed for a habitat housing a specific number of colonists (e.g., 10, 20, 50).
3. Design a habitat layout that incorporates living quarters, resource production areas (e.g., hydroponics), waste recycling systems, and communal spaces.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA scaled habitat design blueprint with calculations and justifications for space allocation.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to apply mathematical ratios and scaling to design sustainable habitats for a specific number of colonists.'
Activity 3

Health Hazard Analysis: The Martian Body & Mind

Students analyze the challenges posed by the Martian environment to human physical and mental health, focusing on the physiological and psychological impacts of extreme conditions.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research the effects of low gravity, radiation exposure, extreme temperatures, and atmospheric differences on the human body.
2. Investigate the psychological challenges of isolation, confinement, and long-duration space travel.
3. Develop a 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan' outlining strategies for mitigating these health risks (e.g., exercise routines, radiation shielding, mental health support systems).

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan' report with research-based recommendations.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to analyze the challenges posed by the Martian environment to human physical and mental health.'
Activity 4

Colony Culture: Martian Society Builders

Students evaluate psychological and social considerations for a small, isolated colony on Mars and propose solutions to promote well-being and prevent conflict, emphasizing community dynamics and conflict resolution.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Identify potential sources of conflict in a small, isolated colony (e.g., resource scarcity, personality clashes, differing values).
2. Research strategies for promoting social cohesion, communication, and conflict resolution in isolated environments (e.g., Antarctic research stations, submarines).
3. Design a 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct' outlining rules, norms, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct' document with justifications for each rule and mechanism.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to evaluate psychological and social considerations for a small, isolated colony on Mars and propose solutions to promote well-being.'
Activity 5

Tech Transformation: Martian Innovation Lab

Students assess existing technologies and propose innovations needed for living on Mars, focusing on adapting Earth-based solutions for the Martian environment and identifying gaps in current technology.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research existing technologies relevant to Martian colonization (e.g., life support systems, robotics, 3D printing).
2. Identify limitations of these technologies in the Martian environment and propose adaptations or improvements.
3. Brainstorm and design new technologies needed to address specific challenges of Martian colonization (e.g., radiation shielding, in-situ resource utilization).

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Martian Innovation Portfolio' showcasing adapted and newly designed technologies with explanations of their functionality and benefits.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to assess existing technologies and propose innovations needed for living on Mars.'
Activity 6

Evidence Examination: Martian Habitation Analysis

Students apply scientific methods to evaluate the habitability of Mars and the Mars One plan, focusing on evidence-based reasoning and critical assessment of claims.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Research scientific evidence related to the habitability of Mars (e.g., presence of water, soil composition, atmospheric conditions).
2. Evaluate the Mars One plan based on this evidence, identifying strengths and weaknesses in their approach.
3. Develop a 'Martian Habitability Report' summarizing the evidence, assessing the feasibility of the Mars One plan, and proposing alternative solutions.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Martian Habitability Report' with evidence-based conclusions and recommendations.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to apply scientific methods to evaluate the habitability of Mars and the Mars One plan.'
Activity 7

Persuasion Powerhouse: Martian Pitch to the Experts

Students use persuasive writing and visual communication to present findings and recommendations to experts, emphasizing clear articulation of ideas and compelling presentation of evidence.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Synthesize findings from previous activities into a cohesive argument for or against the feasibility of the Mars One plan.
2. Create a persuasive presentation (e.g., slideshow, video, mockumentary) that highlights key findings and recommendations.
3. Practice delivering the presentation to a panel of experts (teachers, community members, scientists) and solicit feedback.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA persuasive presentation delivered to a panel of experts, accompanied by a written summary of findings.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: 'Students will be able to use persuasive writing and visual communication to present findings and recommendations to experts.'
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Mars One Feasibility Study Rubric

Category 1

Resource Assessment

Evaluates the student's ability to identify, research, and assess the availability of essential resources for human survival on Mars.
Criterion 1

Resource Identification

Accuracy and completeness in identifying essential resources (water, food, air, shelter, energy).

Exemplary
4 Points

Identifies all essential resources with detailed justifications for their importance in the Martian context. Goes beyond basic needs to consider nuanced requirements.

Proficient
3 Points

Identifies most essential resources with clear justifications. Demonstrates a good understanding of basic needs.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some essential resources, but justifications may be incomplete or lack detail. Shows a basic awareness of human needs.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to identify essential resources or provide relevant justifications. Demonstrates limited understanding of basic needs.

Criterion 2

Martian Availability Research

Thoroughness and accuracy in researching the availability of identified resources on Mars.

Exemplary
4 Points

Conducts in-depth research, providing specific evidence from credible sources regarding the availability of each resource on Mars. Explores multiple potential sources and challenges.

Proficient
3 Points

Conducts thorough research, providing evidence from credible sources regarding the availability of each resource on Mars.

Developing
2 Points

Conducts basic research, but evidence may be limited or from less credible sources. Some resources may be missing research data.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal research effort, with little or no evidence provided. Relies on unsupported claims or irrelevant information.

Criterion 3

Inventory Detailing

Clarity, organization, and detail in presenting the 'Martian Resource Inventory'.

Exemplary
4 Points

Presents a meticulously organized and highly detailed 'Martian Resource Inventory', including acquisition/production methods and potential substitutes. The inventory is visually appealing and easy to understand.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents a well-organized and detailed 'Martian Resource Inventory', including acquisition/production methods and potential substitutes.

Developing
2 Points

Presents a 'Martian Resource Inventory' with some organization, but details may be lacking. Acquisition/production methods or substitutes may be missing.

Beginning
1 Points

Presents a poorly organized and incomplete 'Martian Resource Inventory'. Lacks essential details and is difficult to understand.

Category 2

Habitat Design

Evaluates the student's ability to apply mathematical ratios and scaling to design sustainable habitats for Martian colonists.
Criterion 1

Space Requirement Determination

Accuracy and justification of space requirements per colonist for different activities.

Exemplary
4 Points

Accurately determines space requirements per colonist with detailed and well-reasoned justifications, considering diverse needs (physical, psychological, social).

Proficient
3 Points

Accurately determines space requirements per colonist with clear justifications for different activities.

Developing
2 Points

Determines space requirements per colonist, but justifications may be vague or incomplete. Some activities may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to determine space requirements or provide relevant justifications. Demonstrates limited understanding of spatial needs.

Criterion 2

Mathematical Scaling

Correct application of ratios and scaling to calculate total habitat area and volume.

Exemplary
4 Points

Applies ratios and scaling flawlessly to calculate total habitat area and volume. Shows a deep understanding of mathematical concepts and their application to real-world problems. Calculations are meticulously documented and easy to follow.

Proficient
3 Points

Applies ratios and scaling correctly to calculate total habitat area and volume.

Developing
2 Points

Applies ratios and scaling with some errors, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Calculations may be unclear or incomplete.

Beginning
1 Points

Struggles to apply ratios and scaling. Calculations are incorrect or missing.

Criterion 3

Habitat Layout Design

Functionality, sustainability, and innovation in the habitat layout design.

Exemplary
4 Points

Presents a highly functional, sustainable, and innovative habitat layout that seamlessly integrates living quarters, resource production areas, waste recycling systems, and communal spaces. Design considers accessibility, energy efficiency, and psychological well-being.

Proficient
3 Points

Presents a functional and sustainable habitat layout that incorporates living quarters, resource production areas, waste recycling systems, and communal spaces.

Developing
2 Points

Presents a habitat layout with some functionality, but sustainability may be limited. Some essential areas may be missing or poorly integrated.

Beginning
1 Points

Presents a poorly designed and incomplete habitat layout. Lacks essential areas and demonstrates little understanding of sustainability.

Category 3

Health & Well-being Analysis

Evaluates the student's ability to analyze the challenges posed by the Martian environment to human physical and mental health.
Criterion 1

Environmental Impact Research

Thoroughness and accuracy in researching the effects of the Martian environment on the human body.

Exemplary
4 Points

Conducts comprehensive research, providing detailed and accurate information on the effects of low gravity, radiation exposure, extreme temperatures, and atmospheric differences on the human body. Connects these effects to specific physiological systems.

Proficient
3 Points

Conducts thorough research, providing accurate information on the effects of low gravity, radiation exposure, extreme temperatures, and atmospheric differences on the human body.

Developing
2 Points

Conducts basic research, but information may be incomplete or lack detail. Some environmental factors may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal research effort, with little or no accurate information provided. Relies on unsupported claims or irrelevant information.

Criterion 2

Psychological Challenge Investigation

Depth and insight in investigating the psychological challenges of isolation and confinement.

Exemplary
4 Points

Investigates the psychological challenges of isolation, confinement, and long-duration space travel with exceptional depth and insight. Explores complex issues such as group dynamics, cultural adaptation, and the potential for mental health problems.

Proficient
3 Points

Investigates the psychological challenges of isolation, confinement, and long-duration space travel with clear understanding and relevant details.

Developing
2 Points

Investigates the psychological challenges of isolation and confinement, but analysis may be superficial or lack detail. Some challenges may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal understanding of the psychological challenges of isolation and confinement. Provides little or no relevant information.

Criterion 3

Well-being Plan Development

Effectiveness and feasibility of the 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan'.

Exemplary
4 Points

Develops a highly effective and feasible 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan' outlining innovative strategies for mitigating health risks. The plan integrates physical, mental, and social well-being with concrete, actionable recommendations.

Proficient
3 Points

Develops a 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan' outlining effective strategies for mitigating health risks.

Developing
2 Points

Develops a 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan' with some strategies for mitigating health risks, but effectiveness or feasibility may be limited.

Beginning
1 Points

Develops a poorly conceived and incomplete 'Martian Health and Well-being Plan'. Lacks essential strategies and demonstrates little understanding of health risks.

Category 4

Social Dynamics & Governance

Evaluates the student's ability to address psychological and social considerations for a small, isolated colony on Mars and propose solutions to promote well-being.
Criterion 1

Conflict Source Identification

Comprehensiveness in identifying potential sources of conflict in a Martian colony.

Exemplary
4 Points

Identifies a comprehensive range of potential sources of conflict in a Martian colony, including resource scarcity, personality clashes, differing values, and power dynamics. Demonstrates a deep understanding of human behavior in isolated environments.

Proficient
3 Points

Identifies potential sources of conflict in a Martian colony, including resource scarcity, personality clashes, and differing values.

Developing
2 Points

Identifies some potential sources of conflict in a Martian colony, but analysis may be limited or incomplete. Some key sources may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal understanding of potential sources of conflict. Provides little or no relevant information.

Criterion 2

Strategy Research

Relevance and applicability of researched strategies for promoting social cohesion.

Exemplary
4 Points

Researches highly relevant and applicable strategies for promoting social cohesion, communication, and conflict resolution in isolated environments, drawing from diverse sources (e.g., Antarctic research stations, submarines, intentional communities). Adapts these strategies innovatively to the Martian context.

Proficient
3 Points

Researches relevant strategies for promoting social cohesion, communication, and conflict resolution in isolated environments.

Developing
2 Points

Researches strategies for promoting social cohesion, but relevance or applicability may be limited. Some strategies may be impractical or poorly suited to the Martian context.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal research effort. Strategies are irrelevant or unsupported by evidence.

Criterion 3

Code of Conduct Design

Clarity, comprehensiveness, and enforceability of the 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct'.

Exemplary
4 Points

Designs a highly clear, comprehensive, and enforceable 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct' outlining rules, norms, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The code is tailored to the unique challenges of Martian colonization and promotes fairness, equity, and psychological well-being.

Proficient
3 Points

Designs a 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct' outlining rules, norms, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Developing
2 Points

Designs a 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct' with some rules and norms, but clarity or enforceability may be limited. Dispute resolution mechanisms may be underdeveloped.

Beginning
1 Points

Designs a poorly conceived and incomplete 'Martian Colony Code of Conduct'. Lacks essential rules and demonstrates little understanding of social dynamics.

Category 5

Technological Adaptation & Innovation

Evaluates the student's ability to assess existing technologies and propose innovations needed for living on Mars.
Criterion 1

Technology Research

Breadth and depth of research on existing technologies relevant to Martian colonization.

Exemplary
4 Points

Conducts extensive research on existing technologies relevant to Martian colonization (e.g., life support systems, robotics, 3D printing), demonstrating a deep understanding of their functionality and limitations. Explores cutting-edge advancements and emerging technologies.

Proficient
3 Points

Conducts thorough research on existing technologies relevant to Martian colonization.

Developing
2 Points

Conducts basic research on some existing technologies, but scope may be limited. Some key technologies may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal research effort. Technologies are irrelevant or poorly understood.

Criterion 2

Adaptation/Improvement Proposals

Feasibility and creativity in proposing adaptations or improvements to existing technologies.

Exemplary
4 Points

Proposes highly feasible and creative adaptations or improvements to existing technologies, addressing specific limitations in the Martian environment. Justifications are well-supported by scientific evidence and engineering principles.

Proficient
3 Points

Proposes feasible adaptations or improvements to existing technologies.

Developing
2 Points

Proposes some adaptations or improvements, but feasibility or creativity may be limited. Justifications may be weak or incomplete.

Beginning
1 Points

Proposes poorly conceived or impractical adaptations. Demonstrates little understanding of technological limitations.

Criterion 3

Innovation Design

Originality, functionality, and potential impact of newly designed technologies.

Exemplary
4 Points

Designs highly original, functional, and impactful new technologies to address specific challenges of Martian colonization (e.g., radiation shielding, in-situ resource utilization). Designs are well-documented and demonstrate a deep understanding of scientific principles.

Proficient
3 Points

Designs new technologies to address specific challenges of Martian colonization.

Developing
2 Points

Designs some new technologies, but originality or functionality may be limited. Designs may be incomplete or poorly documented.

Beginning
1 Points

Designs poorly conceived or impractical technologies. Demonstrates little understanding of technological needs.

Category 6

Habitability Evidence Evaluation

Evaluates the student's ability to apply scientific methods to evaluate the habitability of Mars and the Mars One plan.
Criterion 1

Scientific Evidence Research

Thoroughness and relevance of research on scientific evidence related to Martian habitability.

Exemplary
4 Points

Conducts thorough and relevant research on scientific evidence related to the habitability of Mars (e.g., presence of water, soil composition, atmospheric conditions), citing credible sources and demonstrating a deep understanding of scientific concepts.

Proficient
3 Points

Conducts thorough research on scientific evidence related to the habitability of Mars.

Developing
2 Points

Conducts basic research on some scientific evidence, but scope may be limited. Some key evidence may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Demonstrates minimal research effort. Evidence is irrelevant or poorly understood.

Criterion 2

Mars One Plan Evaluation

Critical analysis of the Mars One plan based on scientific evidence.

Exemplary
4 Points

Provides a highly critical and insightful analysis of the Mars One plan based on scientific evidence, identifying both strengths and weaknesses in their approach. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of scientific methodology and evidence-based reasoning.

Proficient
3 Points

Provides a critical analysis of the Mars One plan based on scientific evidence.

Developing
2 Points

Provides a basic analysis of the Mars One plan, but analysis may be superficial or lack detail. Some key strengths or weaknesses may be overlooked.

Beginning
1 Points

Provides a poorly reasoned or unsupported analysis of the Mars One plan. Demonstrates little understanding of scientific evidence.

Criterion 3

Alternative Solution Proposals

Creativity and feasibility of proposed alternative solutions.

Exemplary
4 Points

Proposes highly creative and feasible alternative solutions to address weaknesses in the Mars One plan. Solutions are well-justified and demonstrate a deep understanding of scientific and engineering principles.

Proficient
3 Points

Proposes alternative solutions to address weaknesses in the Mars One plan.

Developing
2 Points

Proposes some alternative solutions, but creativity or feasibility may be limited. Justifications may be weak or incomplete.

Beginning
1 Points

Proposes poorly conceived or impractical solutions. Demonstrates little understanding of the challenges of Martian colonization.

Category 7

Persuasive Communication

Evaluates the student's ability to use persuasive writing and visual communication to present findings and recommendations to experts.
Criterion 1

Argument Synthesis

Effectiveness in synthesizing findings into a cohesive argument.

Exemplary
4 Points

Synthesizes findings from previous activities into a highly cohesive and compelling argument for or against the feasibility of the Mars One plan. The argument is logically structured, well-supported by evidence, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the project's central themes.

Proficient
3 Points

Synthesizes findings into a cohesive argument for or against the feasibility of the Mars One plan.

Developing
2 Points

Synthesizes some findings, but the argument may be fragmented or lack coherence. Evidence may be poorly integrated.

Beginning
1 Points

Fails to synthesize findings into a coherent argument. Demonstrates little understanding of the project's central themes.

Criterion 2

Presentation Design

Clarity, visual appeal, and persuasiveness of the presentation.

Exemplary
4 Points

Creates a highly clear, visually appealing, and persuasive presentation (e.g., slideshow, video, mockumentary) that effectively communicates key findings and recommendations. The presentation is engaging, informative, and tailored to the target audience.

Proficient
3 Points

Creates a persuasive presentation that highlights key findings and recommendations.

Developing
2 Points

Creates a presentation with some visual appeal, but clarity or persuasiveness may be limited. Some key findings may be poorly communicated.

Beginning
1 Points

Creates a poorly designed and ineffective presentation. Lacks clarity, visual appeal, and persuasiveness.

Criterion 3

Delivery & Feedback

Effectiveness in delivering the presentation and responding to feedback.

Exemplary
4 Points

Delivers the presentation with confidence and clarity, effectively engaging the audience and responding thoughtfully to feedback. Demonstrates strong communication skills and a willingness to learn from criticism.

Proficient
3 Points

Delivers the presentation effectively and responds to feedback.

Developing
2 Points

Delivers the presentation with some clarity, but may struggle to engage the audience or respond effectively to feedback.

Beginning
1 Points

Delivers the presentation poorly and struggles to respond to feedback. Demonstrates weak communication skills.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

What was the most surprising thing you learned about the challenges of living on Mars?

Text
Required
Question 2

Which role (e.g., astronomer, psychologist, concept artist) did you find most engaging, and why?

Text
Required
Question 3

How did your understanding of the Mars One plan change throughout this project?

Text
Required
Question 4

On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being 'not at all' and 5 being 'very much,' how much do you think the Mars One plan has a chance of succeeding?

Scale
Required
Question 5

What is one thing you would change or improve about the Mars One plan based on your research?

Text
Required
Question 6

What skills did you develop or improve during this project (e.g., research, teamwork, problem-solving, communication)?

Text
Required
Question 7

Which part of the project (resource reconnaissance, habitat design, health analysis, etc.) did you find the most challenging, and how did you overcome that challenge?

Text
Required