
Mini Golf Motion: Exploring Newton's Laws
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we apply Newton's Laws of Motion to design and test a mini-golf course that not only challenges players but also effectively demonstrates the principles of forces and motion?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How do Newton's Laws of Motion apply to the design and functionality of a mini-golf course?
- What role do forces such as gravity, friction, and angles play in the movement of a golf ball on a mini-golf course?
- In what ways can we design a mini-golf course to challenge players while demonstrating physical principles?
- How can understanding forces and motion improve the design and effectiveness of our mini-golf obstacles?
- What methods can we use to test and modify our mini-golf designs for optimal performance and educational value?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will understand and apply Newton's Laws of Motion to design a functional mini-golf course.
- Students will be able to explain the role of forces such as gravity, friction, and angles in the movement of a golf ball on a course.
- Students will design, test, and modify mini-golf courses to effectively demonstrate physical principles.
- Students will work collaboratively to solve problems related to course design and optimization.
- Students will use the engineering design process to create and refine solutions based on testing and feedback.
NGSS
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsNewton's Lab Challenge
Present students with an intriguing scenario: The school is hosting a mini-golf tournament and demands innovative, science-driven design help. Students need to explore how Newton’s Laws can influence mini-golf course engineering, spurring hands-on inquiries into real-world applications.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Obstacle Design Studio
Students will collaboratively brainstorm and design obstacles for their mini-golf courses, considering how Newton's Laws of Motion can influence the design.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityDetailed sketches of obstacles with labels explaining the physics at play.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with 5-PS2-1 by exploring how gravity affects course elements and 3-5-ETS1-2 through generating design solutions.Course Layout Architect
Students will create the layout of a mini-golf course using coordinate planes to map out obstacles and turns, integrating forces and motion concepts.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA complete course layout with a detailed map illustrating obstacle placement and forces.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.5.G.A.2 by using graphing techniques to represent real-world physics problems.Physics in Play: Testing & Tweaking
Conduct practical testing of mini-golf courses to observe how forces affect the golf ball's movement, making adjustments for optimal design.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn improved mini-golf course with a reflection report on observed forces and modifications made.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with 5-PS2-2 by using observations and modifications to explain the object's motion, meeting 3-5-ETS1-2 criteria for solution testing and refinement.Collaborative Engineering Journal
Students compile a journal documenting their engineering process, decisions made, and insights gained about Newton's Laws through the mini-golf design.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive engineering journal capturing the project's evolution and learning gains about forces.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports 5-PS2-1 and 5-PS2-2 by articulating understanding of forces, while covering 3-5-ETS1-2 engineering design process comprehensively.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioMini-Golf Engineering Portfolio Assessment
Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
Assessing the student's ability to explain and apply Newton's Laws of Motion in the design of mini-golf course obstacles and layouts.Explanation of Newton's Laws
The student clearly explains how Newton's Laws are applied in their mini-golf design, including specific examples from their work.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides detailed and accurate explanations of all Newton's Laws with multiple specific examples from their design process, showcasing deep understanding and innovative application.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly explains most of Newton's Laws with relevant examples from their design process, demonstrating thorough understanding.
Developing
2 PointsPartially explains some aspects of Newton's Laws with few examples, showing emerging understanding.
Beginning
1 PointsMinimally explains Newton's Laws with limited examples, indicating initial understanding.
Application of Forces and Motion
The student effectively applies knowledge of forces such as gravity, friction, and angles in the design and testing phases of the mini-golf course.
Exemplary
4 PointsInnovatively incorporates comprehensive understanding of all relevant forces in the design and testing processes, making insightful adjustments.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively incorporates understanding of most relevant forces in the design and testing, with clear and appropriate adjustments.
Developing
2 PointsApplies basic understanding of some forces in the design and testing, showing inconsistent adjustments.
Beginning
1 PointsShows minimal application of force concepts in design, with limited or no adjustments.
Engineering Design Process
Evaluates the student’s use of the engineering design process in designing, testing, and refining their mini-golf course.Design and Innovation
The student demonstrates creativity and thoroughness in designing obstacles and course layouts using the engineering design process.
Exemplary
4 PointsDesigns highly innovative and detailed course elements with exceptional creativity and adherence to the engineering design process.
Proficient
3 PointsDesigns creative and detailed course elements with solid adherence to the engineering design process.
Developing
2 PointsDesigns basic course elements with some creativity, showing partial adherence to the engineering process.
Beginning
1 PointsDesigns simple course elements with limited creativity and minimal adherence to the engineering process.
Testing and Iteration
The student efficiently tests their golf course design, collects useful data, and makes informed modifications.
Exemplary
4 PointsConducts thorough testing with comprehensive data collection and insightful modifications, greatly improving the design.
Proficient
3 PointsConducts effective testing with good data collection and logical modifications.
Developing
2 PointsConducts basic testing with limited data collection and few modifications.
Beginning
1 PointsConducts minimal testing with little to no data collection or modifications.
Documentation and Reflection
Measures the comprehensiveness and insightfulness of the documentation and reflection during the project process.Journal Completeness
The student's journal thoroughly documents each phase of the project with detailed entries and reflections.
Exemplary
4 PointsJournal is meticulous, with comprehensive entries and deep reflections at all project stages, demonstrating exceptional insights.
Proficient
3 PointsJournal is complete, with detailed entries and thoughtful reflections covering most project aspects.
Developing
2 PointsJournal includes partial entries with basic reflections, lacking depth in some areas.
Beginning
1 PointsJournal is incomplete with minimal entries and reflections, indicating limited process documentation.