
Multilingual Urban Planning for Inclusive Community Spaces
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we design urban spaces that reflect the multilingual diversity of our community, while promoting inclusive development and communication for all residents?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How does language influence urban spaces?
- What role does multilingualism play in community development?
- How can urban planning reflect the diversity of a community?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Develop a foundational understanding of how multilingual needs influence urban planning and design.
- Engage effectively in basic conversations in target languages about urban planning concepts.
- Create and present a simple urban plan proposal that accommodates multilingual communication.
- Analyze how language influences community inclusivity and diversity in an urban context.
ACTFL Intermediate Low
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsMultilingual Cityscape Challenge
Students are presented with a hypothetical city map, where they must identify multilingual needs within the community spaces. They will experience a simulation where different language speakers interact, challenging them to design inclusive signs and communication tools.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Multilingual Dialogue Simulation
Students simulate dialogues with residents from different language backgrounds to practice basic conversational skills and understand language needs.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityRecorded or live role-play of a dialogue between a city planner and a community member.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with ACTFL-IL-2 as students handle social interactions by using simple questions and answers.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioMultilingual Dialogue Simulation Rubric
Language Proficiency
Assessment of students' ability to use simple sentences and questions in the target language during the dialogue simulation.Use of Simple Sentences
Evaluation of the students' ability to accurately construct and use simple sentences in the dialogue.
Exemplary
4 PointsEmploys a wide range of simple sentences accurately and fluently, enhancing the dialogue with appropriate expressions.
Proficient
3 PointsUses simple sentences accurately and frequently, with minor errors that do not impede communication.
Developing
2 PointsOccasionally uses simple sentences with several errors that sometimes impede understanding.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to use simple sentences, with frequent errors that obstruct understanding.
Use of Questions
Ability to ask and answer simple questions appropriately in the dialogue context.
Exemplary
4 PointsConsistently asks thoughtful, relevant questions and provides clear, appropriate answers, facilitating dialogue.
Proficient
3 PointsUsually asks and answers questions effectively, with occasional minor errors.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to ask and answer questions, with some errors that occasionally hinder interaction.
Beginning
1 PointsSeldom asks or answers questions thoughtfully, often causing confusion.
Role-Play Engagement
Evaluation of students' active participation and realism in the role-play simulation, conveying multilingual needs.Cultural Relevance
The extent to which the dialogue reflects cultural and linguistic diversity effectively.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates deep understanding and respectful integration of cultural and linguistic nuances in the role-play.
Proficient
3 PointsIncorporates cultural and linguistic elements appropriately, with minor inaccuracies.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to include cultural elements, with frequent inaccuracies or generalizations.
Beginning
1 PointsLacks cultural and linguistic awareness, resulting in a simplistic or inaccurate dialogue.
Collaboration and Interaction
Assessment of students' collaborative skills and ability to interact effectively with partners.
Exemplary
4 PointsEngages actively and constructively with partner, showing leadership and initiative.
Proficient
3 PointsCollaborates well with partner, contributing effectively to the dialogue.
Developing
2 PointsEngages with partner inconsistently, with limited contribution.
Beginning
1 PointsEngages minimally with partner, hindering role-play progress.