
Novel Character Journey: Who's Your Seatmate?
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can analyzing the character traits, actions, and interactions within a novel inform our choices about which literary characters would make the best seatmates on a long journey?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What character traits do I find most admirable or relatable when choosing a seatmate?
- How do characters' words, actions, and interactions with others reveal their traits?
- In what ways can understanding characters help us understand human behavior and relationships?
- How do the characters in the novel reflect the themes and conflicts of the story?
- What criteria should be used to choose a companion for a journey and why?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will analyze characters' traits, actions, and interactions within a novel to determine their suitability as seatmates on a journey.
- Students will write argumentative essays supporting their choices of characters using textual evidence and clear reasoning.
- Students will demonstrate proficiency in writing mechanics, including grammar, punctuation, and spelling, in their essays.
- Students will develop an understanding of how character development and themes in literature reflect human behavior and relationships.
- Students will practice critical thinking by evaluating and explaining their reasoning for selecting certain character traits as desirable for a travel companion.
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsCharacter Trade Show
Set up a trade show where each booth showcases a character from the novel. Students can wander around, watch dramatic presentations, and collect 'character cards' about each personage, helping them decide who they connect with the most for their transit adventure.Character Podcast Interviews
Students are given an audio recording from a fictional podcast where characters from the novel are being interviewed. The podcast gives insights into each character's traits, challenges faced, and their personal stories, sparking curiosity about which characters would make the best travel companions.Mystery Travel Itinerary
Students receive a mystery envelope containing a travel itinerary with hints about who will be on the journey drawn from the novel's characters. Each itinerary hint leads them to uncover character traits and stories prompting them to guess and decide on their ideal travel partners.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Character Connection Journals
In this activity, students will begin to understand the relevance of character traits by journaling initial thoughts about different characters in the novel. They will connect these traits to what they believe makes a good travel companion.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA personal journal with initial observations linking character traits to travel companion qualities.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.6.3 and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.6.4 by examining characters' traits and language use in text.Character Trait Detective
Students will dive deeper into analyzing characters by collecting evidence from the text that supports their interpretations of character traits. This will hone their skills in citing evidence and forming interpretations.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA completed graphic organizer with cited evidence and explanations of character traits.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.6.1 by requiring textual evidence for character analysis.Character Debate Café
Engaging in a debate, students will discuss and defend their choice of characters as ideal travel companions based on collected evidence and character analysis.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityGroup debates articulating and defending character choices with evidence and reasoning.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsEncourages mastery of CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.6.1 by organizing claims and supporting them with evidence.Character Analysis Essay
Students will write an essay that synthesizes insights from their journals, graphic organizers, and debates to clearly argue which characters are best to sit next to on a journey based on character traits.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA polished essay arguing for the selection of certain characters as ideal travel companions.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsFully supports CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.6.4 and related standards for producing clear, coherent written arguments.Reflective Travel Blog
Students synthesize their learnings and reflect on the entire character analysis journey by writing a blog post from the perspective of traveling with their chosen characters.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA creative, reflective travel blog post envisioning a journey with selected characters.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports standards CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.3 and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.4 by encouraging creative use of language and detailed character description.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioCharacter Analysis & Evaluation Rubric
Understanding Character Traits
Evaluates students' depth of understanding and analysis of character traits as portrayed in the novel.Trait Identification
Accuracy and insight in identifying and understanding character traits from the novel.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates thorough and insightful understanding of character traits from the text, with highly accurate identifications supported by nuanced analysis.
Proficient
3 PointsIdentifies character traits accurately, showing a good understanding supported by appropriate analysis.
Developing
2 PointsShows a basic understanding of character traits with some accurate identifications; analysis may lack depth.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to accurately identify character traits; shows minimal understanding or confusion in analysis.
Textual Evidence
Quality and relevance of textual evidence used to support trait identification and analysis.
Exemplary
4 PointsSelects highly relevant and compelling evidence from the text to strongly support analysis of character traits.
Proficient
3 PointsUses appropriate and generally relevant evidence to support understanding of character traits.
Developing
2 PointsUses some evidence from the text, but it may be irrelevant or weakly support trait analysis.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides little to no textual evidence, with minimal effort to link evidence to trait analysis.
Argument Construction
Assesses the clarity, coherence, and strength of arguments developed for character selection as travel companions.Thesis Development
Clarity and relevance of thesis statements in character analysis and selection.
Exemplary
4 PointsCrafts a compelling, clear, and original thesis that thoroughly guides character selection and analysis.
Proficient
3 PointsDevelops a clear thesis that effectively guides character selection and analysis.
Developing
2 PointsOffers a thesis that is somewhat clear but may not fully guide the analysis or selection effectively.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents an unclear or irrelevant thesis, providing little guidance for analysis and selection.
Argument Depth and Structure
Logical structure and depth of arguments presented in essays and debates.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents advanced, well-structured, and logical arguments with comprehensive supporting details.
Proficient
3 PointsOffers structured and logical arguments with adequate supporting details.
Developing
2 PointsPresents arguments, but they may be loosely structured or lack some supporting details.
Beginning
1 PointsArguments are poorly structured and lack clarity and supporting details.
Creative Expression
Assessment of creativity and effectiveness in character reflection and travel blog writing.Reflective Insight
Depth of reflection and personal insight incorporated into character analysis.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates exceptional reflection with deep personal insights and connections to characters.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides clear reflection and personal insights that connect well to characters.
Developing
2 PointsOffers some reflection and personal insight, though connections may be vague or underdeveloped.
Beginning
1 PointsReflection lacks personal insight, with minimal connection to characters.
Creativity and Engagement
Ingenuity and engagement level of creative writing in travel blogs.
Exemplary
4 PointsProduces highly creative and engaging writing, imaginatively incorporating character traits and interactions.
Proficient
3 PointsDelivers engaging writing with creative elements that incorporate character traits.
Developing
2 PointsWriting shows some creativity but may lack elements of engagement or depth in character incorporation.
Beginning
1 PointsWriting lacks creativity and engagement, with poor incorporation of character traits.
Language Conventions and Mechanics
Evaluation of language use, grammar, and writing mechanics in essays and creative writing.Grammar and Syntax
Correctness of grammar, sentence structure, and language use in writing tasks.
Exemplary
4 PointsExhibits impeccable grammar and syntax with varied and sophisticated language use.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates correct grammar and syntax with effective language use.
Developing
2 PointsDisplays occasional grammar errors; language use is mostly appropriate.
Beginning
1 PointsFrequent grammar errors detract from clarity, with inappropriate language use.
Cohesion and Organization
Logical flow and organization in written arguments and blogs.
Exemplary
4 PointsAchieves exceptional organization with logical flow and clear progression of ideas.
Proficient
3 PointsShows good organization with a logical flow and progression of ideas.
Developing
2 PointsOrganization is present but may lack clear flow or progression of ideas.
Beginning
1 PointsLacks clear organization, impeding logical flow and progression of ideas.