
Periodic Table Escape Room
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we design an escape room using the periodic table to educate our peers about atomic structure, element properties, and the ethical implications of chemistry-related technologies?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How does the arrangement of the periodic table reflect the properties of elements?
- How do the number of subatomic particles affect an element's identity and stability?
- What are the ethical implications of chemistry-related technologies?
- How can models be used to explain the relationship between atomic structure and the periodic table?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to explain the arrangement of the periodic table and its relationship to element properties.
- Students will be able to model how changes in subatomic particles affect element identity and stability.
- Students will be able to analyze and communicate the ethical implications of chemistry-related technologies.
- Students will be able to design an escape room with clues based on the periodic table.
chemistry standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsMystery Element Outbreak
A simulated 'outbreak' occurs in the school, with each symptom linked to a specific element deficiency or toxicity. Students must use their knowledge of the periodic table to identify the mystery elements and develop a 'cure' before time runs out, mirroring real-world diagnostic problem-solving.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Atomic Structure Blueprint
Students will create a detailed model of an atom, labeling its components and explaining their roles in determining the element's properties. This activity reinforces understanding of atomic structure and its connection to the periodic table.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA labeled atomic model with a written explanation of the relationship between subatomic particles and element properties.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.P1U1.1 (Develop and use models to explain the relationship of the structure of atoms to patterns and properties observed in the periodic table)Element Identity Card
Students will research and create an 'identity card' for a specific element, detailing its properties, uses, and how changes in its subatomic particles would affect its identity and stability. This activity emphasizes the connection between subatomic particles and element characteristics.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Element Identity Card' showcasing the element's properties and the effects of altering its subatomic makeup.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS+C.P1U1.1 (Develop and use models to demonstrate how changes in the number of subatomic particles (protons, Neutrons, electrons) affect the identity, stability and properties of the element)Tech Impact Report
Students will investigate a chemistry-related technology (e.g., nuclear energy, pharmaceuticals) and write a report outlining its positive and negative ethical, social, and/or political implications. This activity promotes critical thinking about the broader impacts of chemistry.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive report detailing the ethical, social, and/or political implications of a chosen chemistry-related technology.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS.P1U3.4 (Obtain, evaluate and communicate information about how the use of chemistry related technologies have had positive and negative ethical, social, and/or political implications)Nuclear Debate Briefing
Students will prepare a debate briefing on the benefits and liabilities of nuclear processes (fission, fusion, radioactive decay), supporting their arguments with evidence. This activity develops argumentation skills and encourages consideration of different perspectives.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA debate briefing outlining the benefits and liabilities of a nuclear process, supported by evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS+C.P1U3.8 (Engage in argument from evidence regarding the ethical, social, economic, and/or political benefits and liabilities of fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.)Escape Room Design Proposal
Students will create a detailed proposal for their periodic table escape room, including the theme, storyline, puzzle designs, and how each puzzle aligns with specific learning goals and standards. This activity integrates all previous learning and applies it to a creative design project.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA comprehensive escape room design proposal, including theme, storyline, puzzle designs, and alignment with learning goals and standards.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsIntegrates all standards (HS.P1U1.1, HS+C.P1U1.1, HS.P1U3.4, HS+C.P1U3.8) by applying knowledge to a practical design project.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioPeriodic Table Escape Room Portfolio Rubric
Atomic Structure and Element Properties
This category assesses the student's understanding of atomic structure, how it relates to element properties, and how changes in subatomic particles affect element identity and stability.Atomic Model Accuracy
Accuracy and clarity of the atomic model and explanation of subatomic particles.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe atomic model is exceptionally accurate and clearly labeled, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the roles of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The explanation is comprehensive and insightful.
Proficient
3 PointsThe atomic model is accurate and well-labeled, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the roles of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The explanation is clear and complete.
Developing
2 PointsThe atomic model has some inaccuracies or is not clearly labeled, indicating an emerging understanding of the roles of subatomic particles. The explanation is partially complete.
Beginning
1 PointsThe atomic model is inaccurate or poorly labeled, demonstrating a limited understanding of the roles of subatomic particles. The explanation is incomplete or unclear.
Element Identity and Subatomic Changes
Understanding and explanation of how changes in subatomic particles affect element identity, stability and properties.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of how changes in the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons affect an element's identity, stability, and properties. The explanation is detailed and provides specific examples.
Proficient
3 PointsDemonstrates a thorough understanding of how changes in the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons affect an element's identity, stability, and properties. The explanation is clear and accurate.
Developing
2 PointsShows an emerging understanding of how changes in the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons affect an element's identity, stability, and properties. The explanation is partially accurate or incomplete.
Beginning
1 PointsShows a limited understanding of how changes in the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons affect an element's identity, stability, and properties. The explanation is unclear or inaccurate.
Ethical Implications of Chemistry Technologies
This category assesses the student's ability to analyze and communicate the ethical, social, and/or political implications of chemistry-related technologies.Tech Impact Analysis
Depth and breadth of the analysis of the ethical, social, and/or political implications of a chosen technology.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the chosen technology's ethical, social, and/or political implications. Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking and considers multiple perspectives.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a thorough analysis of the chosen technology's ethical, social, and/or political implications. Demonstrates effective critical thinking and considers different perspectives.
Developing
2 PointsProvides a basic analysis of the chosen technology's ethical, social, and/or political implications. Demonstrates some critical thinking but may overlook certain perspectives.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides a limited analysis of the chosen technology's ethical, social, and/or political implications. Demonstrates minimal critical thinking and lacks consideration of different perspectives.
Argumentation and Evidence
Strength and clarity of the argument presented in the debate briefing, supported by relevant evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a compelling and well-supported argument, using a wide range of relevant evidence. Effectively addresses potential counterarguments with insightful rebuttals.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents a clear and well-supported argument, using relevant evidence. Addresses potential counterarguments effectively.
Developing
2 PointsPresents an argument with some supporting evidence, but the connection between evidence and claims may not always be clear. Addresses some counterarguments but may not fully refute them.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents a weak argument with limited supporting evidence. Fails to address potential counterarguments or does so ineffectively.
Escape Room Design and Alignment
This category assesses the creativity, feasibility, and alignment of the escape room design with the learning goals and standards.Puzzle Design and Functionality
Originality, clarity, and functionality of the escape room puzzles.
Exemplary
4 PointsPuzzles are highly original, creative, and seamlessly integrated into the escape room theme. Each puzzle is clearly explained, challenging, and effectively assesses the intended learning goals.
Proficient
3 PointsPuzzles are creative and well-designed, fitting appropriately into the escape room theme. Each puzzle is clearly explained, challenging, and assesses the intended learning goals.
Developing
2 PointsPuzzles are somewhat simplistic or lack clear connection to the escape room theme. Explanations may be incomplete, and the puzzles may not fully assess the intended learning goals.
Beginning
1 PointsPuzzles are poorly designed, confusing, or lack relevance to the escape room theme. Explanations are unclear, and the puzzles do not effectively assess the intended learning goals.
Proposal Clarity and Completeness
Clarity, organization, and completeness of the escape room design proposal.
Exemplary
4 PointsThe proposal is exceptionally clear, well-organized, and comprehensive, providing a detailed overview of the escape room theme, storyline, puzzle designs, and alignment with learning goals and standards. Demonstrates a high level of planning and attention to detail.
Proficient
3 PointsThe proposal is clear, well-organized, and complete, providing a thorough overview of the escape room theme, storyline, puzzle designs, and alignment with learning goals and standards.
Developing
2 PointsThe proposal is somewhat disorganized or incomplete, lacking details about the escape room theme, storyline, puzzle designs, or alignment with learning goals and standards.
Beginning
1 PointsThe proposal is unclear, poorly organized, and incomplete, providing minimal information about the escape room theme, storyline, puzzle designs, and alignment with learning goals and standards.