Perspective in Panem: Exploring Empathy in The Hunger Games
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as ethical literary critics, use textual evidence to show that empathy is the ultimate expression of human dignity and a reflection of Catholic social teachings in the dehumanizing world of Panem?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How does Suzanne Collins use Katniss’s point of view to contrast the Capitol’s 'culture of death' with the inherent dignity of the individual? (RL.7.6)
- How do acts of sacrificial love and solidarity—such as Katniss volunteering for Prim—serve as the central theme for what it means to be truly human? (RL.7.2)
- In what ways does the setting of the arena force characters to choose between self-preservation and the Catholic call to see the 'Image of God' in their neighbors? (RL.7.3)
- What specific textual evidence proves that empathy is a moral victory over the Capitol, even when it leads to physical risk? (RL.7.1)
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze and cite multiple pieces of textual evidence to support an argument regarding character motivations and the role of empathy in survival.
- Evaluate how Suzanne Collins develops the theme of empathy through the contrast between the tributes and the Capitol.
- Analyze how the high-stakes setting of the Games influences character interactions and the development of interpersonal relationships.
- Examine the impact of first-person point of view on a reader's understanding of a character's internal moral conflict.
- Construct a formal literary argument that determines whether empathy functions as a survival tool or a liability, using specific evidence from 'The Hunger Games'.
Common Core State Standards (ELA)
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Perspective Flip: Hero or Victim?
Students view two different 'trailers' for the same event in the book: one edited as a glamorous Capitol action movie and one as a tragic District documentary. They must identify how the 'edit' changes the audience's empathy for the characters, leading to a deep dive into how point of view shapes our moral understanding of the story.The Capitol Watch Party
Students enter a classroom split into two zones: a luxury 'Capitol Lounge' with treats and a 'District Square' with meager rations. As they watch a high-stakes survival clip, they must record their feelings about the 'entertainment' from their assigned perspective, sparking a debate on how social standing influences our ability to empathize with others' suffering.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Through the Mockingjay's Eyes: The POV Filter
In this opening activity, students will step into the mind of Katniss Everdeen to explore how her internal monologue creates empathy in the reader. They will choose a pivotal scene (such as the Reaping or the Tribute Parade) and contrast Katniss's private thoughts with the 'official' Capitol narrative. This helps students understand how point of view is the primary tool for humanizing characters in a dehumanizing setting.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Dual-Perspective Script' featuring two columns: one side showing Katniss’s internal thoughts (rich with empathy and fear) and the other showing the Capitol’s televised commentary (focused on entertainment and spectacle).Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity directly addresses RL.7.6 by requiring students to analyze how Suzanne Collins uses Katniss’s first-person point of view to contrast her internal moral landscape with the 'culture of death' presented by the Capitol's media.The Arena's Edge: Mapping Character & Setting
Students will analyze how the brutal environment of the Games acts as a catalyst for character development. By mapping out specific locations in the arena (the Cornucopia, the woods, the cave), students will identify how the setting either strips away a character's humanity or provides an opportunity for them to reclaim it through empathy.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Environmental Impact Map'—a visual representation of the arena where students pin specific moments of 'Empathy vs. Survival' to the geographic locations where they occurred.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis aligns with RL.7.3 by analyzing how the harsh setting of the arena (the environment) interacts with character choices, forcing them to choose between basic survival and empathetic connection.The Evidence Lab: Investigating Moral Victories
Transitioning into deep analysis, students become 'Evidence Investigators.' They will search the text for moments where empathy is shown as a moral victory rather than a weakness. They must go beyond the surface level to find quotes that prove empathy is a deliberate choice made by characters to maintain their dignity.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Evidence Case File' containing three 'Exhibits' (quotes) with detailed annotations explaining the inference of character motivation.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity meets RL.7.1 by requiring students to cite specific textual evidence and draw inferences about character motivations beyond what is explicitly stated.Architects of Meaning: Constructing the Theme
Now that students have evidence, they will synthesize it to describe the story's heart. They will track the development of the theme 'Empathy as Resistance' from the beginning of the book to the end. They will analyze how Katniss’s small acts of kindness grow into a larger statement of rebellion against the Capitol’s 'culture of death.'Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Theme Growth Chart'—a visual infographic that traces the evolution of empathy from a private feeling to a public act of defiance.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis aligns with RL.7.2 by asking students to determine a central theme (empathy as human dignity) and analyze how it is developed through the progression of the plot.The Ethical Critic’s Final Verdict: Empathy as Resistance
In the culminating activity, students take on the role of 'Ethical Literary Critics.' They will compile their previous work into a final portfolio and write a persuasive closing argument. They must answer the driving question: Is empathy a survival tool or a liability in the world of Panem? They will use their POV analysis, setting maps, and evidence logs to support their final verdict.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe 'Panem Portfolio'—a polished collection of all previous activities, prefaced by a 3-paragraph formal 'Critique of Dignity.'Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis final activity synthesizes RL.7.1, RL.7.2, RL.7.3, and RL.7.6 into a cohesive argument (W.7.1), requiring students to present a final judgment on the text's moral core.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioThe Ethical Critic: Empathy in Panem Rubric
Literary Analysis & Application
This category evaluates the core literary and ethical components of the 'Empathy in The Hunger Games' project.Textual Evidence & Inference (Evidence Lab)
Citing several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of character motivations (empathy vs. self-preservation) and drawing logical inferences. (RL.7.1)
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides multiple, high-quality pieces of textual evidence that perfectly support the analysis. Inferences are profound, revealing deep insights into character souls and motivations that go beyond the literal text. Connection to human dignity is explicit and sophisticated.
Proficient
3 PointsCites several pieces of relevant textual evidence to support analysis. Inferences are logical and clearly explained, showing a solid understanding of character motivations and the role of empathy.
Developing
2 PointsCites limited or somewhat relevant evidence. Inferences are present but may be superficial or inconsistently linked to the provided quotes. Basic understanding of motivation is shown.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides little to no textual evidence, or evidence is unrelated to the claims. Inferences are missing or inaccurate. Struggles to identify character motivations.
Theme Development & Synthesis (Theme Growth Chart)
Determining the central theme of empathy/dignity and analyzing its development from a private emotion to a public act of defiance throughout the text. (RL.7.2)
Exemplary
4 PointsArticulates a sophisticated theme statement and provides a comprehensive analysis of its growth. Clearly identifies the inciting incident, rising action, and climax of the theme with nuanced detail. Summary is objective yet powerful.
Proficient
3 PointsDetermines a clear theme statement and traces its development through key plot points (Inciting Incident, Rising Action, Climax). Provides an objective summary of how the message of empathy is built.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies a basic theme but the analysis of its development is incomplete or lacks clear connection to the plot structure. Summary may be partially subjective or missing key events.
Beginning
1 PointsIdentifies an inaccurate theme or fails to provide a theme statement. Does not track the development of the idea across the text.
Literary Elements: POV & Setting (The Arena & POV Filter)
Analyzing how Suzanne Collins uses Katniss’s first-person POV to contrast the Capitol's narrative and how the arena setting forces choices between survival and empathy. (RL.7.3, RL.7.6)
Exemplary
4 PointsExpertly analyzes how the POV filter creates empathy, showing a sharp contrast between internal thoughts and external spectacle. Environmental Impact Map shows a complex understanding of how specific settings dictate moral choices.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively contrasts Katniss's internal voice with the Capitol's narrative. Environmental Impact Map correctly identifies locations and provides clear analysis of 'Empathy vs. Survival' choices in those settings.
Developing
2 PointsProvides a basic contrast between POV perspectives, but the 'inner voice' may lack depth. Environmental map identifies locations but the analysis of setting’s impact on empathy is weak or repetitive.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to distinguish between the internal POV and the Capitol narrative. Map is incomplete or fails to connect character choices to the specific arena environment.
Argumentation & Final Critique (The Panem Portfolio)
Constructing a formal literary argument (The Panem Portfolio) that determines whether empathy is a tool or liability, using clear reasons and a logical sequence. (W.7.1)
Exemplary
4 PointsConstructs a compelling, sophisticated argument with a precise claim. Evidence is seamlessly integrated. The conclusion brilliantly bridges the fictional world of Panem with real-world ethical concepts of human dignity.
Proficient
3 PointsWrites a clear argument with a logical progression of ideas. Supports the claim with relevant evidence from previous activities. Conclusion makes a meaningful connection to the 'Image of God' or human dignity.
Developing
2 PointsArgument is present but the claim may be broad or the evidence loosely organized. The transition between the portfolio activities and the final critique is somewhat disjointed. Conclusion is brief.
Beginning
1 PointsArgument lacks a clear claim or logical structure. Fails to synthesize previous work into a cohesive portfolio. Conclusion does not address the driving question or ethical context.
Craftsmanship & Professionalism
Demonstrating professional growth, attention to detail in portfolio assembly, and high-quality final products (Scripts, Maps, Charts).
Exemplary
4 PointsPortfolio is exceptionally organized and polished. All visual elements (Map, Growth Chart) are creative and enhance the reader's understanding. Reflection shows deep metacognitive growth.
Proficient
3 PointsPortfolio is well-organized and follows all instructions. Final products are complete, neat, and professional. Shows clear evidence of effort and revision.
Developing
2 PointsPortfolio is mostly organized but may be missing elements or contain several errors in presentation. Some activities appear rushed or lack the 'final product' polish.
Beginning
1 PointsPortfolio is disorganized, incomplete, or messy. Work does not meet basic grade-level expectations for presentation and effort.