Playground Engineers: Mythbusting Gravity and Tracking the Sun
Created byJulie Richmond
101 views3 downloads

Playground Engineers: Mythbusting Gravity and Tracking the Sun

Grade 5Science20 days
In this hands-on project, fifth-grade students step into the roles of playground engineers and "MythBusters" to explore how Earth’s forces and solar patterns dictate safe and functional design. Through field research and experiments, learners collect empirical evidence of gravity’s downward pull and track daily shadow patterns to construct functional sundials and solar-optimized blueprints. The experience culminates in the creation of a 3D scale model that strategically applies scientific data to solve real-world playground challenges like heat exposure and equipment placement.
GravitySolar PatternsEngineering DesignShadow TrackingStellar DistanceScale ModelingMythBusters
Want to create your own PBL Recipe?Use our AI-powered tools to design engaging project-based learning experiences for your students.
📝

Inquiry Framework

Question Framework

Driving Question

The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as lead engineers and MythBusters, design an “Out-of-This-World” playground that harnesses Earth’s gravity and the Sun’s predictable patterns to create the ultimate play experience?

Essential Questions

Supporting questions that break down major concepts.
  • How can we design an 'Out-of-This-World' playground that uses the laws of Earth and Space to create the ultimate play experience? (Driving Question)
  • How does Earth’s gravitational pull determine the way we design and play on equipment like swings and slides?
  • How can we use the Sun’s predictable patterns to create a functional sundial for our playground?
  • Why does the Sun provide more light and heat for our playground than any other star in the sky?
  • How can we use 'MythBusting' research to prove that gravity always pulls objects toward the center of the Earth?
  • How do the changing lengths and directions of shadows throughout the day affect where we should place different playground structures?

Standards & Learning Goals

Learning Goals

By the end of this project, students will be able to:
  • Investigate and document the effects of gravity on playground equipment, providing evidence that Earth's gravitational force pulls objects toward its center.
  • Design and construct a functional sundial for the playground by tracking and predicting changes in shadow length and direction throughout the day.
  • Develop a scientific argument explaining why the Sun appears larger and brighter than other stars and how its distance affects the playground's environment.
  • Apply engineering design principles to create a playground model that strategically places structures based on solar patterns and gravitational forces.
  • Conduct field research and 'MythBusting' experiments to collect data and communicate findings about how physical forces and celestial patterns impact design.

NGSS

5-PS2-1
Primary
Support an argument that the gravitational force exerted by Earth on objects is directed down.Reason: This is the foundation for the 'MythBusters' research phase where students observe swings and other equipment to prove gravity's direction.
5-ESS1-2
Primary
Represent data in graphical displays to reveal patterns of daily changes in length and direction of shadows, day and night, and the seasonal appearance of some stars in the night sky.Reason: This standard is directly met through the creation of the sundial and the mapping of shadows for playground structure placement.
5-ESS1-1
Primary
Support an argument that differences in the apparent brightness of the sun compared to other stars is due to their relative distances from Earth.Reason: Students use this to justify why the Sun is the primary source of light and heat for their playground design compared to other stars.
3-5-ETS1-1
Secondary
Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time, or cost.Reason: This supports the engineering aspect of the project where students must design the playground within the specific constraints of the scientific concepts.

Entry Events

Events that will be used to introduce the project to students

The Forensic Playground Audit

Students view a video of 'Playground Fails' where equipment seems to defy physics or works poorly, then act as 'Safety Engineers' to audit their own playground. They must use levels and weighted strings (plumb bobs) to prove how every piece of equipment—from the slide’s incline to the swing’s chain—relies on the constant downward pull of gravity to keep children safe.

The VIP Star Gala

Students enter a darkened room where a tiny LED candle right in front of them appears brighter than a high-powered floodlight across the hallway. This 'Light Illusion' challenge prompts students to investigate why our Sun dominates the playground while other stars are tiny pinpricks, leading to a design requirement for a 'Stellar Distance Station' in their playground models.

The Sundial Secret Service

The class is challenged to help a fictional 'Global Park Designer' who lost their watch and needs a playground that tells time. Students are sent to the blacktop with giant pieces of chalk to 'capture' the shadow of a single playground pole every 30 minutes, creating a massive, collaborative human-scale data map that reveals the predictable movement of the Earth.

The Gravity Glitch Investigation

Students receive a 'Top Secret' briefing from the 'Department of Playground Physics' claiming that gravity has been acting 'suspiciously' on the school's swings. Carrying clipboards and cameras, students head to the playground as 'MythBusters' to document evidence (through photos and 'drop tests') that gravity's pull is always directed 'down' toward the Earth's center, regardless of the swing's arc.

Architects of the Sun

Students are commissioned by the 'Solar City Council' to design a playground that provides maximum shade during the hottest part of the day without using any electricity. They must use 'shadow-tracking sticks' on the playground to predict where the sun will be at noon and 2 PM, using that data to determine the geometric orientation of their future playground structures.
📚

Portfolio Activities

Portfolio Activities

These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.
Activity 1

Gravity MythBusters: The Field Audit

In this introductory 'MythBusters' phase, students act as field researchers to investigate the school's existing playground. They will use tools like plumb bobs (a string with a weight) and 'Gravity Drop Kits' to prove that gravity always acts in a downward direction toward Earth's center, even on moving equipment like swings and slides.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Participate in a 15-minute mini-lesson on the definition of 'Down' as the direction toward the center of the Earth.
2. Visit the playground in small 'MythBuster' teams equipped with clipboards, cameras, and plumb bobs.
3. Conduct the 'Swing Test': Stop a swing at various points in its arc and use the plumb bob to show which way 'down' is.
4. Conduct the 'Slide Drop': Drop various safe objects (balls, beanbags) from the top of the slide and record their path.
5. Label your findings in the Evidence Log, explicitly stating how the data 'busts' the myth that gravity changes direction.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Gravity Evidence Log' featuring annotated photos or sketches that use arrows to show the direction of gravitational pull on at least three different pieces of equipment.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with 5-PS2-1 by requiring students to gather empirical evidence that Earth's gravitational force pulls objects 'down' toward the center of the Earth, regardless of the object's position or motion (e.g., a swing at the top of its arc).
Activity 2

The VIP Star: Brightness vs. Distance Challenge

Students will investigate why the Sun is the 'star of the show' on their playground while other stars are invisible during the day. Through a 'Distance vs. Brightness' simulation, they will realize that the Sun's importance to their playground design is due to its relative distance, not just its size.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Watch a 10-minute mini-lesson on stellar distances and the inverse square law of light (simplified for 5th grade).
2. In a darkened room, use two identical flashlights—one placed 1 foot away and one placed 20 feet away—to observe differences in apparent brightness.
3. Measure the 'glow diameter' of both lights and record the data in a comparison table.
4. Research the distance of the Sun versus the next closest star (Proxima Centauri) to add scale to the argument.
5. Draft the final CER poster justifying why the Sun is the only star that affects the playground's temperature and visibility.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Star Power Argument' claim-evidence-reasoning (CER) poster that explains why the Sun must be the primary consideration for their playground's light and heat.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with 5-ESS1-1 by having students support an argument that the Sun’s apparent brightness is a result of its proximity to Earth compared to other stars.
Activity 3

Shadow Chasers: The Sun-Clock Chronicles

Before building their models, students must understand the 'dance' of the Sun. They will create a 'Shadow Tracking Station' on the blacktop to collect data on how the Earth's rotation changes the shadows cast by a fixed object, which will later determine where they place shade structures in their playground.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Engage in a 15-minute mini-lesson on Earth's rotation and how it creates the illusion of the Sun 'moving' across the sky.
2. Set up a 'Shadow Pole' (a vertical meter stick) on a sunny area of the playground.
3. Measure and trace the shadow of the pole at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 2:00 PM.
4. Use a meter stick to measure the length and a compass to record the direction of each shadow.
5. Translate this playground data into a line graph (length) and a bird's-eye view diagram (direction) in the project portfolio.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Daily Shadow Pattern Graph' showing the length of a shadow at three different times of day (Morning, Noon, Afternoon) and a compass-style map showing the change in direction.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with 5-ESS1-2 by requiring students to represent data in graphical displays to reveal patterns of daily changes in the length and direction of shadows.
Activity 4

Architects of the Sun: The Master Blueprint

Using the 'Shadow Pattern Graph' from the previous activity, students will now act as 'Solar Engineers' to draft the layout of their playground. They must strategically place equipment like slides, swings, and benches based on where the sun will be at peak playtime to ensure safety and comfort.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Analyze the shadow data from Activity 3 to identify the 'Hot Zone' (maximum sun) and 'Cool Zone' (maximum shade) for the afternoon.
2. Decide on the placement of a 'Sundial Station' that must be in an unshaded area all day.
3. Place 'Heat-Sensitive' equipment (like metal slides) in areas that will be shaded during the hottest part of the day.
4. Draw the final blueprint, using symbols to represent gravitational pull on the swings and the orientation of the sundial.
5. Write a short 'Design Justification' explaining how the sun's patterns influenced three specific layout choices.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Solar-Optimized Blueprint'—a color-coded map of the playground that explains the placement of each structure based on solar and gravitational data.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with 3-5-ETS1-1 and 5-ESS1-2 by using collected data to define the constraints and criteria for a successful playground design (e.g., placing the slide out of direct afternoon sun to prevent burns).
Activity 5

The Final Build: Out-of-This-World Playground Model

Students bring their research to life by constructing a 3D scale model of their 'Out-of-This-World' playground. The model must feature a working mini-sundial, a swing set that demonstrates gravitational pull, and a 'Distance Station' that explains the Sun's brightness.

Steps

Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.
1. Review the 15-minute mini-lesson on scale and materials (using cardboard, straws, string, and clay).
2. Construct the 'Gravity Swing'—the chains must hang perfectly 'down' (perpendicular to the base) to show Earth's pull.
3. Install the 'Miniature Sundial' on the model, ensuring it is calibrated based on the direction data gathered in Activity 3.
4. Add a 'Solar Distance Marker'—a small LED or yellow orb positioned to represent why the Sun is our primary light source compared to distant stars.
5. Conduct a 'Final Inspection' using the MythBusters checklist to ensure the model accurately represents the scientific laws studied.

Final Product

What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 3D Scale Model of the playground accompanied by a 'Physics Tour Guide' (a small pamphlet or flip-grid video) explaining the science behind each feature.

Alignment

How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity integrates all standards (5-PS2-1, 5-ESS1-1, 5-ESS1-2, and 3-5-ETS1-1) by requiring the physical application of gravity and solar science into a tangible engineering model.
🏆

Rubric & Reflection

Portfolio Rubric

Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolio

Out-of-This-World Playground Portfolio Rubric

Category 1

Force and Motion: Gravity MythBusters

Assesses the ability to prove gravity's constant downward pull through field research.
Criterion 1

Gravitational Evidence (5-PS2-1)

Demonstrating that the gravitational force exerted by Earth on objects is directed toward the center of the spherical Earth (down).

Exemplary
4 Points

Sophisticated argument supported by precise evidence from the 'MythBusters' audit. Correctly identifies 'down' as the center of the Earth on 4+ items. Evidence log uses precise vector arrows and clear terminology.

Proficient
3 Points

Clear argument supported by evidence from the 'MythBusters' audit. Correctly identifies 'down' on 3 pieces of equipment. Evidence log shows arrows pointing toward the center of Earth.

Developing
2 Points

Emerging argument with inconsistent evidence. Identifies gravity as pulling 'down' but struggles to define it as 'toward the center of the Earth' or only audits 1-2 items.

Beginning
1 Points

Argument is incomplete or inaccurate. Struggled to identify the direction of gravitational pull or failed to provide documented evidence in the log.

Category 2

Earth's Place in the Universe: Star Power

Assesses the understanding of the Sun's role as a star and the impact of distance on brightness.
Criterion 1

Stellar Argumentation (5-ESS1-1)

Using claim-evidence-reasoning (CER) to explain that the Sun's apparent brightness is due to its proximity to Earth compared to other stars.

Exemplary
4 Points

CER poster provides a sophisticated argument using specific comparative data (e.g., Sun vs. Proxima Centauri). Effectively integrates results from the flashlight simulation to prove the inverse square law of light.

Proficient
3 Points

CER poster provides a thorough argument. Uses evidence from the simulation to explain that the Sun appears brighter and larger because it is much closer than other stars.

Developing
2 Points

CER poster shows a basic understanding but reasoning is incomplete. May confuse size with distance or provide limited evidence from the simulation.

Beginning
1 Points

Argument is missing or significantly flawed. Does not connect distance to apparent brightness in the context of the playground environment.

Category 3

Space Systems: Shadow Chasers

Assesses the collection and graphical representation of solar data to identify predictable patterns.
Criterion 1

Shadow Pattern Analysis (5-ESS1-2)

Representing data in graphical displays (line graphs and maps) to reveal daily patterns in the length and direction of shadows.

Exemplary
4 Points

Data representation is precise and aesthetically clear. Graph reveals specific patterns of Earth's rotation. Compass map shows high accuracy in shadow orientation at all three time intervals.

Proficient
3 Points

Data representation is thorough and accurate. Includes a line graph for shadow length and a compass map for direction with all three time intervals (9 AM, Noon, 2 PM) correctly plotted.

Developing
2 Points

Data representation is emerging but inconsistent. Graph or map may contain minor plotting errors or missing labels. Shows basic patterns but lacks precision.

Beginning
1 Points

Data representation is incomplete or inaccurate. Fails to show a clear change in length or direction over time. Needs support to interpret patterns.

Category 4

Engineering Design: Playground Architects

Assesses the application of solar and gravitational data to create a functional engineering design.
Criterion 1

Solar-Optimized Engineering (3-5-ETS1-1)

Designing a playground that uses scientific data to solve specific problems, such as heat exposure and sundial calibration.

Exemplary
4 Points

Blueprint and model demonstrate innovative application of data. Strategic placement of all equipment optimizes shade/safety. Design justification provides expert-level scientific reasoning for every choice.

Proficient
3 Points

Blueprint and model demonstrate successful application of data. Places heat-sensitive equipment in shaded areas and calibrates the sundial correctly. Justification explains layout choices using shadow data.

Developing
2 Points

Blueprint and model show basic attempts to use data, but some structures may still be poorly placed (e.g., slide in full sun). Justification is present but lacks specific data references.

Beginning
1 Points

Design does not reflect the data gathered. Placement of items appears random or does not account for solar patterns/gravitational pull. Justification is missing.

Category 5

The Master Build: Out-of-This-World Model

Assesses the ability to communicate scientific findings through a tangible model and guided explanation.
Criterion 1

Synthesis and Communication

Synthesizing all scientific concepts into a final 3D model and communicating the 'Physics Tour' to an audience.

Exemplary
4 Points

Final model is a masterwork of integration. 'Physics Tour Guide' (video/pamphlet) uses advanced vocabulary and shows deep metacognition about the engineering process and scientific laws.

Proficient
3 Points

Final model effectively integrates all concepts (Gravity Swing, Sundial, Distance Station). 'Physics Tour Guide' clearly explains the science behind each feature using appropriate terminology.

Developing
2 Points

Final model includes most required features, but some scientific elements are unclear or poorly constructed. Communication of the science is basic or requires prompting.

Beginning
1 Points

Final model is incomplete or fails to represent the scientific concepts. Tour guide provides little to no explanation of the science involved in the design.

Reflection Prompts

End-of-project reflection questions to get students to think about their learning
Question 1

How confident are you in explaining to a new playground user why 'down' always points to the center of the Earth, regardless of how they are moving on a swing or slide?

Scale
Required
Question 2

Based on your 'Star Power' research, what is the main reason the Sun provides more light and heat for your playground than larger, more distant stars?

Multiple choice
Required
Options
Because the Sun is the largest star in the entire universe.
Because the Sun is much closer to our playground than any other star.
Because other stars only exist at night and disappear during the day.
Because the Sun's heat makes it look brighter than it actually is.
Question 3

Look at your 'Solar-Optimized Blueprint.' How did your data on shadow length and direction help you decide exactly where to place heat-sensitive equipment like metal slides or benches?

Text
Required
Question 4

What was the most challenging 'myth' to investigate on the playground, and what specific piece of evidence from your 'Gravity Evidence Log' helped you prove the truth?

Text
Required
Question 5

How well do you feel you balanced the 'fun' parts of your playground design with the 'science' requirements (gravity, shadows, and solar distance)?

Scale
Required