
Project Resurrection: Designing Evolutionary Success for Extinct Species
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as conservation scientists, design a scientifically viable and ethically responsible "de-extinction plan" for an extinct species to ensure it can successfully adapt and thrive in a modern ecosystem?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How do changes in an ecosystem’s environmental conditions determine whether a species thrives, adapts, or faces extinction?
- How can we use evidence from modern relatives and the fossil record to reconstruct the evolutionary history and survival needs of an extinct species?
- In what ways do specific physical and behavioral adaptations contribute to an organism’s 'evolutionary fitness' in its original habitat versus a modern one?
- How does genetic variation within a population influence its long-term survival and ability to resist new environmental pressures?
- What are the ecological and ethical implications of reintroducing a 'resurrected' species into a modern ecosystem that has evolved in its absence?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze evolutionary relationships between an extinct species and its modern relatives using fossil records and DNA evidence to justify its selection for de-extinction.
- Evaluate how specific physical and behavioral adaptations contributed to an extinct species' fitness and predict how those traits would function in a modern ecosystem.
- Apply principles of natural selection to model how a resurrected population might respond to current environmental pressures, such as climate change or invasive species.
- Assess the ethical and ecological implications of reintroducing a species into a modified environment, considering both potential benefits and risks to existing biodiversity.
- Design a comprehensive conservation plan that includes strategies for maintaining genetic diversity and habitat restoration to support the long-term survival of the resurrected species.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
Common Core State Standards (ELA/Literacy in Science & Technical Subjects)
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Paleo-Safari Prospectus
Students are hired as 'Evolutionary Consultants' for a new world-class safari park that aims to feature extinct megafauna. They are given a budget and a map of modern biomes and must use comparative anatomy and evolutionary history to select a species that won't just survive in a cage, but can thrive in the wild.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Ancestry Archive: Mapping the Lineage
In this foundational activity, students act as 'Evolutionary Historians.' They will research their chosen extinct species and its closest living relatives. By comparing fossil records, vestigial structures, and modern anatomy, students will construct a cladogram to visualize the evolutionary lineage and justify why their species is a candidate for de-extinction based on its genetic and historical background.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Ancestry Archive' Infographic featuring a cladogram, a comparison table of traits between the extinct animal and its modern relative, and a summary of fossil evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS-LS4-1: Students communicate scientific information about common ancestry by linking their extinct species to modern relatives through fossil and anatomical evidence.The Adaptation Blueprint: Engineering Fitness
Students will perform a deep dive into the 'Fitness' of their species. They must identify specific physical and behavioral adaptations that allowed the species to survive in its original environment. Students will then use the four factors of natural selection to explain how these traits became dominant in the population before the species went extinct.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Biological Blueprint' poster or digital slide deck that labels specific adaptations and provides a written narrative of the natural selection process.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS-LS4-4 and HS-LS4-2: Students explain how natural selection leads to adaptation and how the four factors of evolution (variation, inheritance, competition, and proliferation) shaped their species.The Extinction Autopsy & Habitat Audit
Before bringing an animal back, students must understand why it left in the first place. Students will investigate the 'Extinction Drivers' of their species—whether it was climate change, loss of habitat, or human intervention. They will then compare the ancient environment to a specific modern biome to determine if the species could survive the environmental pressures of today.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Environmental Impact Case Study' comparing the paleo-environment to a modern-day habitat, concluding with a 'Survival Score.'Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsHS-LS4-5: Students evaluate evidence showing how changes in environmental conditions result in the extinction of species and assess modern conditions.The Resurrection Pitch: The Paleo-Safari Prospectus
This is the capstone activity where students synthesize all previous research into a formal pitch for the 'Paleo-Safari Safari Park.' They must not only prove the species can survive biologically but also address the ethical implications of reintroducing an extinct predator or herbivore into a modern ecosystem. They will present their plan to a 'Board of Directors' (the class/teacher).Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe 'De-Extinction Master Prospectus'—a professional-style proposal document and a persuasive presentation.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSynthesis of all standards (HS-LS4-1 through HS-LS4-5) and WHST.9-12.7: Students conduct sustained research to solve a problem and communicate their scientific findings.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioThe Resurrection Project: De-Extinction Design & Evolutionary Analysis Rubric
Evolutionary Foundations
Focuses on the biological evidence of evolution and the mechanisms of natural selection that shaped the species.Lineage Reconstruction & Evidence (HS-LS4-1)
Accuracy and depth of the cladogram and the use of fossil/anatomical evidence to support common ancestry between the extinct species and modern relatives.
Exemplary
4 PointsConstructs an intricate cladogram with precise divergence points; synthesizes multiple lines of empirical evidence (fossil, vestigial, and anatomical) to create a sophisticated narrative of common ancestry.
Proficient
3 PointsConstructs a correct cladogram; provides clear fossil and anatomical evidence to support the relationship between the extinct species and its modern relatives.
Developing
2 PointsConstructs a basic cladogram with some inaccuracies; provides limited or superficial evidence from the fossil record to support lineage claims.
Beginning
1 PointsCladogram is missing or contains significant errors; evidence for common ancestry is absent, incorrect, or based on non-scientific information.
Mechanisms of Adaptation & Fitness (HS-LS4-2, HS-LS4-4)
The identification of specific adaptations and the application of the four factors of evolution (variation, inheritance, competition, and proliferation) to explain species fitness.
Exemplary
4 PointsIdentifies unique adaptations and provides a sophisticated explanation of how the four factors of evolution interacted to drive natural selection, using the species as a model for complex evolutionary change.
Proficient
3 PointsIdentifies four adaptations and correctly applies the four factors of evolution to explain how these traits led to survival and reproduction in the original environment.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies some adaptations but applies the four factors of evolution inconsistently or with minor conceptual errors regarding natural selection.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to identify relevant adaptations or misidentifies the role of natural selection and the four factors in the species' evolutionary history.
Ecological Viability & Environment
Evaluates the species' ability to survive in a modern context based on environmental changes and ecological data.Extinction Drivers & Habitat Audit (HS-LS4-5)
Analysis of the original causes of extinction and the rigorous comparison of paleo-environmental conditions to modern-day ecological pressures.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a comprehensive 'Extinction Autopsy' that evaluates complex interactions between environmental factors; conducts a highly detailed habitat audit that identifies nuanced modern pressures like invasive genetics or micro-climates.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly identifies the primary cause of extinction and provides a thorough comparison between the ancient and modern environments, including temperature, precipitation, and predators.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies a cause of extinction but provides a generic or superficial comparison of environmental conditions; fails to identify specific modern pressures.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to identify the cause of extinction or provides an inaccurate description of the environment; comparison between habitats is missing or illogical.
Survival Probability & Population Viability (HS-LS4-3)
The use of biological data to predict the probability of survival for the resurrected population in a modern ecosystem.
Exemplary
4 PointsDevelops a sophisticated 'Survival Score' model using concepts of probability and population genetics to predict long-term viability and adaptation potential with high accuracy.
Proficient
3 PointsApplies concepts of statistics and probability to support a logical explanation of why the species would likely thrive or fail in the chosen modern location.
Developing
2 PointsProvides a basic prediction of survival but lacks statistical support or fails to account for how heritable traits influence population proportions over time.
Beginning
1 PointsMakes an unsupported claim about survival without considering environmental fit, genetic variation, or the probability of population growth.
Synthesis & Professional Communication
Focuses on the ability to synthesize scientific research into a professional proposal and address the societal/ethical impacts of science.Ethical & Ecological Stewardship (HS-LS4-5)
Evaluation of the ecological impact of reintroduction and the ethical considerations of 'playing god' with extinct biodiversity.
Exemplary
4 PointsProposes a visionary conservation plan that includes advanced strategies for genetic diversity; provides a profound ethical argument that addresses complex biodiversity trade-offs and global implications.
Proficient
3 PointsEvaluates potential risks to local biodiversity and proposes a clear, feasible management plan to monitor species health and prevent ecological disruption.
Developing
2 PointsMentions ethical concerns or ecological risks but lacks a concrete plan for managing the species or mitigating potential negative impacts on the ecosystem.
Beginning
1 PointsDisregards ethical implications and ecological risks; fails to provide a management plan for the reintroduction of the species.
Scientific Synthesis & Persuasive Communication (WHST.9-12.7)
Effectiveness of the 'Resurrection Pitch' and the 'De-Extinction Master Prospectus' in synthesizing research and persuading the audience.
Exemplary
4 PointsDelivers a professional, compelling pitch that seamlessly synthesizes complex biological data into a persuasive narrative; uses high-quality visual aids and handles counter-arguments with scientific authority.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents a cohesive and well-researched prospectus that synthesizes all portfolio activities into a clear, evidence-based argument for de-extinction.
Developing
2 PointsPresents a summary of findings that lacks synthesis; the argument for de-extinction is present but relies more on opinion than on the accumulated biological evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsPitch is disorganized, incomplete, or fails to use the research gathered in previous activities; lacks a persuasive or evidence-based argument.