Redlining West Egg: A Spatial Justice Mapping Project
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as critical cartographers, redesign the geography of The Great Gatsby to expose the "invisible lines" of systemic exclusion and propose a new map that visualizes spatial justice for all?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How does the physical geography of East Egg, West Egg, and the Valley of Ashes encode social status and racial exclusion in the novel?
- In what ways do the characters’ movements across the map of Long Island and New York reveal the "invisible lines" of privilege and systemic restriction?
- How did historical 1920s-era policies, such as redlining and racial covenants, inform the myth of meritocracy that Fitzgerald depicts?
- Whose presence and history are "erased" from the landscape of Gatsby, and how does applying a Critical Race Theory lens challenge the traditional interpretation of the text?
- How can we use counter-cartography (redesigning the map) to visualize spatial justice and propose a more equitable distribution of power and resources?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will analyze how Fitzgerald uses the specific geography of 1920s Long Island (East Egg, West Egg, and the Valley of Ashes) to encode social status, wealth disparity, and racial exclusion.
- Students will apply the tenets of Critical Race Theory (such as systemic racism and counter-storytelling) to investigate how spatial segregation and property rights serve as mechanisms for maintaining systemic racial and social hierarchies within the narrative.
- Students will synthesize historical research on 1920s-era redlining, racial covenants, and urban planning with the fictional narrative to identify "invisible lines" of privilege and restriction.
- Students will design a "Spatial Justice Map" using counter-cartography techniques to visualize an equitable redistribution of power and resources, justifying their design choices with textual and historical evidence.
- Students will evaluate whose voices and histories are erased from the landscape of the novel and propose ways to center those marginalized perspectives through their redesigned geography.
Common Core State Standards (ELA)
Learning for Justice Social Justice Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Covenant of Exclusion Case File
Students are presented with a 'leaked' 1922 Restricted Deed for the Buchanan estate in East Egg, which contains explicit language barring anyone who isn't 'Caucasian' or 'of a certain social standing.' Students must analyze this legal document alongside the book’s descriptions of the Valley of Ashes to map out where the 'imaginary' lines of the novel meet the 'legal' lines of historical New York.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Literary Surveyor: Mapping the Myth
Before diving into historical redlining, students must first understand the 'mental map' Fitzgerald creates. In this activity, students will act as literary surveyors, extracting textual evidence to create a visual representation of the novel's geography (East Egg, West Egg, the Valley of Ashes, and New York City). They will focus specifically on the 'borders' mentioned in the text—the water, the ash heaps, and the railroad tracks—and the symbolic language used to describe each zone.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn Annotated Literary Map featuring key quotes that define the boundaries and 'vibe' of each geographical area.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.3 (Analyzing the impact of the author's choices regarding setting) and Justice 12 (Assessing how systemic inequality affects the distribution of resources).The Redline Reveal: Investigating Invisible Borders
Students will now bridge the gap between fiction and history. Using the 'Covenant of Exclusion Case File' and historical HOLC (Home Owners' Loan Corporation) maps from the 1920s, students will investigate how real-world racial covenants and redlining mirrored the social walls in Gatsby’s world. They will look for the 'invisible lines' that kept the Valley of Ashes a wasteland and the 'palaces' of East Egg exclusive.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Redline Overlay' report that compares a specific fictional boundary in the book to a real-world 1920s restrictive covenant.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.11-12.7 (Integrating multiple sources of information) and Justice 12 (Social group dynamics and systemic inequality).Counter-Narrative Cartography: Re-centering the Margins
Applying Critical Race Theory, students will identify the 'ghosts' of the landscape—the people of color, immigrant workers, and marginalized groups who are present in the 1920s context but largely erased or marginalized in Fitzgerald's narrative. Students will research who actually lived in the areas surrounding 'West Egg' and 'The Valley of Ashes' to provide a counter-story to the main narrative.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Counter-Narrative Legend' for their map, featuring three 'Lost Profiles' of individuals or groups erased from the traditional Gatsby map.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.9 (Foundational works and thematic treatment) and Justice 12 (Assessing power and resource distribution).The Spatial Justice Blueprint: Redesigning for Equity
In the final activity, students act as 'Spatial Justice Architects.' They will redesign the geography of the novel to dismantle the systems of exclusion they have studied. This isn't just about moving buildings; it’s about reimagining land use, transportation, and housing to create an equitable version of the Long Island landscape. They must justify every change using CRT principles.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe Spatial Justice Map of West Egg: A large-scale visual redesign accompanied by an 'Architect’s Manifesto' (explanatory essay).Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.11-12.2 (Writing informative/explanatory texts) and RI.11-12.7 (Integrating multiple sources).Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioRedlining West Egg: Spatial Justice Rubric
Critical Analysis & Research
Focuses on the student's ability to analyze the intersection of literary setting and historical systemic exclusion.Literary Geography & Symbolism
Analyzes the symbolic and social hierarchy of Fitzgerald's geography (East Egg, West Egg, Valley of Ashes) using specific textual evidence.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a sophisticated analysis of symbolic geography; uses nuanced textual evidence to identify subtle boundary markers and explains how setting mirrors complex social hierarchies. Maps are meticulously annotated with insightful literary evidence.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately identifies and maps the primary geographical zones. Uses relevant textual evidence and quotes to describe the 'vibe' and class status of each area. Annotations are clear and grounded in the text.
Developing
2 PointsMaps the basic zones but may miss symbolic nuances. Textual evidence is present but may be limited or superficial. Annotations describe physical traits rather than social hierarchy.
Beginning
1 PointsMapping of zones is incomplete or inaccurate. Minimal or irrelevant textual evidence is used to support the geographical layout. Annotations are missing or vague.
Historical Policy Synthesis
Integrates historical 1920s redlining data and restrictive covenants with the fictional setting to expose systemic exclusion.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates a profound understanding of how real-world policy (HOLC maps, covenants) dictated fictional outcomes. Synthesis of historical data and literary setting is seamless and reveals deep structural insights.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively compares historical redlining maps and deeds with fictional boundaries. Analysis clearly explains how 'invisible lines' were codified in legal and financial policy within the 1920s context.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies historical policies and fictional boundaries but the connection between them is inconsistent or lacks depth. Comparative analysis is present but primarily descriptive.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to identify the connection between real-world policy and the text. Historical research is missing, inaccurate, or unrelated to the literary analysis.
Equity & Perspective-Taking
Evaluates the application of Critical Race Theory and the inclusion of marginalized perspectives.Counter-Narrative Development
Applies Critical Race Theory to identify and re-center marginalized voices or groups erased from the original narrative landscape.
Exemplary
4 PointsDevelops compelling, well-researched counter-stories that fundamentally challenge the dominant narrative. 'Lost Profiles' are deeply integrated into the map and reflect sophisticated CRT application.
Proficient
3 PointsIdentifies three specific marginalized groups or individuals and creates plausible counter-stories grounded in historical demographic research. 'Justice Legend' effectively visualizes these presences.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies 'outsiders' but counter-stories lack historical detail or narrative depth. Voices are added to the map but remain peripheral to the analysis.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to identify marginalized groups or provides counter-stories that are stereotypical or unsupported by research. Representation on the map is missing.
Synthesis & Communication
Assesses the final synthesis of knowledge through creative redesign and written justification.Spatial Justice Design
Redesigns the map of West Egg and the Valley of Ashes to dismantle systems of exclusion and visualize spatial justice.
Exemplary
4 PointsProposes an innovative and visionary redesign that systematically replaces exclusionary structures with equitable infrastructure. Design choices reflect a masterly application of spatial justice principles.
Proficient
3 PointsRedesign clearly addresses 'invisible lines' by proposing specific infrastructure (e.g., housing, transit) that promotes equity. Zoning laws are rewritten to prioritize access over exclusion.
Developing
2 PointsRedesign includes some changes to the landscape, but they are either cosmetic or do not fully address the systemic nature of spatial injustice identified earlier.
Beginning
1 PointsRedesign is incomplete or maintains the existing systems of exclusion. Changes lack a clear connection to the goal of spatial justice.
Architect’s Manifesto (Explanatory Writing)
Writes a clear, persuasive manifesto justifying design choices through the lens of CRT and historical research.
Exemplary
4 PointsArchitect’s Manifesto is a powerful, high-level argument (500-750 words) that expertly synthesizes literature, history, and CRT. Writing is sophisticated, logically flawless, and deeply persuasive.
Proficient
3 PointsManifesto (500-750 words) clearly explains the rationale for redesign choices. Writing is organized and accurately cites textual and historical evidence to support the 'Spatial Justice' vision.
Developing
2 PointsManifesto provides a basic explanation of changes but lacks a strong argumentative link to CRT or historical data. Writing may be disorganized or fall short of the required length.
Beginning
1 PointsManifesto is missing, excessively brief, or fails to provide a logical justification for the redesigned map. Reasoning is not grounded in the project’s themes.