
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we create an engaging and effective workshop that teaches our peers about digital citizenship and responsible online behavior, while addressing the consequences of not following a tech code of conduct?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What is digital citizenship and why is it important for students?
- How can we identify responsible online behavior?
- What are the potential consequences of not following a tech code of conduct?
- How can we apply the principles of a tech code of conduct to various online platforms?
- What strategies can we develop to promote positive online interactions among peers?
- In what ways can understanding digital citizenship protect your privacy and security online?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to define digital citizenship and articulate its importance for online interactions.
- Students will identify characteristics of responsible online behavior.
- Students will explore and analyze the consequences of not adhering to a tech code of conduct.
- Students will apply the principles of a tech code of conduct to case studies of online interactions.
- Students will design a workshop that effectively communicates strategies for positive online interactions.
Digital Citizenship Standards
Computer Science Standards
Technology Education Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsDigital Detective Agency
Students walk into a mysterious setup where they find a broken tablet and notes scattered around. They must identify different online ethical dilemmas through clues and question a 'digital detective' character about what went wrong. Each dilemma leads them to a deeper discussion about online responsibilities.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Code of Conduct Detective
Students investigate and research different aspects of online responsibilities and digital citizenship. This activity sets the foundation for understanding key concepts related to the tech code of conduct.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA group presentation, either in digital format (like a slideshow) or a poster, outlining their findings on online responsibilities.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with Digital Citizenship standards by promoting awareness of responsible online behavior.Empathy Mapping Exercise
Students create an empathy map to understand the impact of online behavior on others. This exercise fosters a deeper understanding of empathy in the digital world.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityEmpathy maps created by each pair that illustrate the emotional responses and impacts of online behavior.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports Digital Citizenship by encouraging students to think critically about others' perspectives online.Workshop Blueprint Builders
Based on their research and empathy maps, students develop a workshop outline that teaches their peers about online responsibilities and digital citizenship.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed workshop outline that includes interactive activities, presentation sections, and handouts.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses Digital Citizenship standards by encouraging students to design their own educational content.Final Presentation and Reflection
Students present their workshops to classmates and reflect on their learning process throughout the project.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA formal presentation of their workshop to the class and individual written reflections on their learning.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsMeets Digital Citizenship standards by enabling students to articulate their understanding of responsible online behavior and reflect on their learning.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioDigital Citizenship Workshop Rubric
Understanding of Digital Citizenship
Evaluates students' comprehension of digital citizenship and responsible online behavior from research to presentation.Comprehensiveness of Research
The extent to which students gather and present detailed, accurate information about online responsibilities.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresented a detailed and thoroughly researched analysis of online responsibilities, including multiple perspectives and in-depth examples.
Proficient
3 PointsPresented a well-rounded analysis with clear, accurate details and examples about online responsibilities.
Developing
2 PointsProvided a basic analysis with some accurate details and a few examples about online responsibilities.
Beginning
1 PointsIncluded limited or inaccurate details about online responsibilities, showing minimal understanding.
Application of Citizenship Principles
How effectively students apply digital citizenship principles in their work.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrated innovation in applying digital citizenship principles to create impactful and engaging content.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively applied digital citizenship principles to create relevant content.
Developing
2 PointsAttempted to apply principles with partial success, resulting in some relevant content.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggled to apply digital citizenship principles, resulting in unclear or irrelevant content.
Collaborative Skills and Empathy
Assesses students' ability to work collaboratively and integrate empathy into their understanding and content creation.Collaboration and Team Dynamics
Quality and effectiveness of collaboration among team members during the project.
Exemplary
4 PointsExhibited leadership and highly effective collaboration that leveraged each member’s strengths.
Proficient
3 PointsWorked well with teammates, contributing effectively to the project’s success.
Developing
2 PointsParticipated in team efforts with some contribution to the project’s progress.
Beginning
1 PointsHad difficulty collaborating and contributed minimally to the group’s work.
Empathy in Digital Contexts
Ability to integrate empathy when discussing digital interactions and their consequences.
Exemplary
4 PointsExpertly included empathy in analyzing and discussing digital scenarios, showing deep understanding.
Proficient
3 PointsAppropriately integrated empathy in discussions, demonstrating a solid understanding of its importance.
Developing
2 PointsIncorporated some aspects of empathy in analysis with limited depth.
Beginning
1 PointsShowed minimal understanding or application of empathy in digital scenarios.
Workshop Delivery and Reflection
Focuses on the effectiveness of workshop presentation and student reflection on their learning journey.Engagement and Delivery
Effectiveness of the workshop delivery in engaging peers and conveying key messages.
Exemplary
4 PointsDelivered a highly engaging, clear, and organized workshop that captivated the audience throughout.
Proficient
3 PointsDelivered a clear and organized workshop that effectively communicated the core messages.
Developing
2 PointsThe workshop was somewhat engaging but lacked coherence or full clarity at times.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggled to engage the audience, with unclear or disorganized delivery.
Reflection and Personal Growth
Quality of individual reflections on learning and personal growth concerning online responsibilities.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvided insightful reflections demonstrating comprehensive understanding and personal growth.
Proficient
3 PointsReflection showed understanding and a personal connection to learning.
Developing
2 PointsReflections included some personal insights but lacked depth and connection.
Beginning
1 PointsReflections were superficial or lacked a personal learning perspective.