
The College Starter Pack: Choosing Your Best Financial Accounts
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we, as emerging adults, evaluate and recommend the most strategic combination of savings and credit tools to build financial stability and avoid the debt traps common in the transition to college?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How can we leverage banking tools to build financial stability and avoid the pitfalls of debt before entering adulthood?
- What role does debt play in a personal economy, and when does it transition from a tool to a burden?
- How do interest rates function as both a cost of debt and a benefit of saving?
- What are the long-term consequences of managing credit card debt poorly versus using it as a strategic financial tool?
- How do we evaluate and compare the fine print of financial products to identify those that are most beneficial for a student budget?
- How does the choice of a savings account influence one's ability to handle financial emergencies and meet future goals?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will evaluate and compare specific savings accounts and credit cards using criteria such as interest rates (APY/APR), fee structures, and account benefits.
- Students will analyze the mechanics of debt, specifically credit card interest and minimum payments, to predict the long-term impact on financial stability.
- Students will interpret the 'fine print' and disclosure documents (Schumer Box) of various financial products to identify hidden costs and contractual obligations.
- Students will justify a recommendation for a 'financial starter kit' (savings/credit combination) tailored to the specific needs and income constraints of a college student.
- Students will demonstrate the ability to calculate how compound interest affects both savings growth and debt accumulation over time.
New Jersey Student Learning Standards - Personal Financial Literacy
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsThe Influencer Audit
Students are presented with three 'FinTok' (Financial TikTok) influencer videos, each aggressively promoting a different savings account or credit card as the 'only way to get rich.' Students are tasked with becoming 'Financial Fact-Checkers' to determine which influencer is a genius and which is leading their followers toward a credit score disaster.The 'Too Good to Be True' Trap
Students walk into a classroom decorated with flashy, neon posters for the 'Ultimate College Flex Card,' promising 'Instant Approval' and 'Free Pizza for a Year.' After students 'apply' on a mock app, the teacher reveals the hidden 38% APR and a $100 annual fee in the fine print, sparking a heated debate on why banks target students and how to spot a debt trap.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Banking Blueprint: Scouting Your Financial HQ
Before choosing a specific account, students must understand the landscape of financial institutions. In this activity, students research the differences between traditional big banks, credit unions, and online-only banks. They will investigate how each institution treats savings, looking specifically at Annual Percentage Yield (APY), minimum balance requirements, and accessibility. This sets the foundation for understanding how money can grow through interest while remaining secure.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Banking Comparison Matrix' that ranks three different types of institutions based on their friendliness to student savers.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with standard 9.1.12.FI.2 (Compare features of different financial institutions) and 9.1.12.CDM.3 (Explain the impact of interest rates on savings). Students must differentiate between where they keep their money and how that choice affects their interest earnings.The Double-Edged Sword: Debt Discovery
Students shift their focus to the world of credit. Before looking at specific cards, they must understand the 'why' and 'how' of debt. Students will analyze three scenarios: using credit for a needed car repair (emergency), using it for a spring break trip (lifestyle), and using it to build a credit score (strategic). They will weigh the advantages (rewards, safety, credit building) against the disadvantages (high interest, overspending, debt cycles).Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA 'Debt Pros & Cons Infographic' that illustrates when credit functions as a helpful tool and when it becomes a financial burden.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity directly addresses standard 9.1.12.CDM.1 (Identify the purposes, advantages, and disadvantages of debt). It requires students to look beyond the 'free money' myth of credit cards and understand the strategic use versus the high-risk reality of borrowing.The Schumer Box Sleuth
In this 'forensic' activity, students learn to read the 'Schumer Box'βthe standardized disclosure table required for credit cards. They will compare two popular student credit cards, looking past the flashy marketing to find hidden fees, late payment penalties, and the true cost of the APR (Annual Percentage Rate). They will also look at the 'fine print' of a savings account to find 'stealth fees' like out-of-network ATM charges or paper statement fees.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn 'Annotated Schumer Box' and 'Fee Map' that highlights and explains the most dangerous 'traps' found in the fine print of their chosen cards.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity aligns with 9.1.12.CDM.4 (Determine the impact of fees) and 9.1.12.CDM.3 (Impact of interest rates on borrowing). By using the Schumer Box, students are directly engaging with the technical literacy required by the standards.The College Launch Kit: Final Pitch
Students culminate their research by selecting one specific savings account and one specific credit card that work together to create a 'Financial Launch Kit' for a college freshman. They must present their recommendation as a pitch to a peer, justifying why this specific combination offers the best growth for savings and the safest introduction to credit. They must use data (interest rates, fee structures, and perks) to defend their choice against the 'FinTok' influencers seen at the start of the project.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityThe 'College Launch Kit Recommendation'βa digital presentation or formal report that provides a data-backed justification for their chosen financial tools.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsThis activity synthesizes 9.1.12.CDM.2 (Compare and contrast different types of credit and providers) and the overall goal of the project. It requires students to justify their choices using the data gathered in previous activities.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioThe College Launch Kit: Strategic Financial Decision-Making Rubric
College Launch Kit: Financial Literacy & Strategic Banking Rubric
This rubric evaluates the student's ability to navigate the complex world of personal banking and credit. It focuses on the transition from high school to college, emphasizing technical literacy (reading the fine print), mathematical projection (calculating interest), and strategic decision-making (choosing the right tools for a stable financial future).Financial Institution Analysis (FI.2, CDM.3)
Evaluates the ability to research, differentiate, and rank various financial institutions (National, Credit Union, Online) based on their utility for a student saver.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a sophisticated analysis of three distinct institution types. Ranking is backed by nuanced insights into accessibility, APY, and digital tools. Projections for $1,000 growth are flawlessly calculated and contextualized within long-term goals.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately compares three types of financial institutions. Correctly identifies APY and calculates growth for $1,000. Ranking logic is clear and based on standard student needs.
Developing
2 PointsCompares at least two institution types. Growth calculations may contain minor errors. Ranking is present but lacks specific data-driven justification.
Beginning
1 PointsIdentifies institutions but fails to distinguish between types (e.g., treats all as the same). Calculations are missing or significantly incorrect. No clear ranking provided.
Strategic Debt Assessment (CDM.1)
Measures the student's understanding of debt as a tool, including the ability to distinguish between productive and consumptive debt and the mechanics of the 'debt spiral.'
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates a high-level mastery of debt mechanics. Infographic provides a compelling visual narrative of the 'Debt Spiral' and proposes a 'Credit Code of Conduct' that prioritizes long-term financial health and credit score optimization.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly distinguishes between productive and consumptive debt. Accurately illustrates the impact of high APR on a carrying balance. 'Credit Code' includes three practical, responsible rules.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies basic advantages and disadvantages of debt. Analysis of the 'Debt Spiral' is surface-level. 'Credit Code' rules are vague or generic.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to identify the purpose of debt beyond 'buying things.' Infographic is incomplete or fails to show the cost of interest over time.
Technical Literacy: The Schumer Box (CDM.4, CDM.3)
Assesses the student's ability to interpret standardized financial disclosures (Schumer Box) and identify the impact of fees on their personal economy.
Exemplary
4 PointsExpertly decodes the Schumer Box, identifying subtle costs like Penalty APR and transaction fees. The 'Fee Map' provides a comprehensive 'plain English' translation that reveals a deep understanding of contractual obligations.
Proficient
3 PointsCorrectly identifies and explains primary APR, Annual Fees, and Late Fees within the Schumer Box. Explanations of fee impacts are accurate and grounded in the provided disclosure documents.
Developing
2 PointsLocates basic fee information but struggles to explain the 'Penalty APR' or the long-term cost of secondary fees. Annotation is present but lacks detail.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to locate key information in the Schumer Box. Does not differentiate between different types of interest rates or fees.
Synthesis & Recommendation (CDM.2)
Evaluates the student's ability to synthesize research into a cohesive, data-backed recommendation for a 'Financial Launch Kit.'
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a powerful, evidence-based argument that directly refutes 'FinTok' myths. Justification is multifaceted, considering APY, APR, fees, and perks to prove why this specific combination is superior for a college student.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a logical recommendation for a savings/credit pairing. Uses specific data points (rates and fees) gathered in previous steps to justify why these tools were selected.
Developing
2 PointsRecommends a kit, but the justification is weak or relies on 'marketing' rather than data. Connection to student-specific needs is inconsistent.
Beginning
1 PointsRecommendation is missing or appears arbitrary. No evidence of using previous research to inform the final selection.
Mathematical Application & Projections (CDM.3)
Measures the accuracy and application of financial mathematics, specifically regarding compound interest in savings and the cumulative cost of credit.
Exemplary
4 PointsCalculations are flawlessly executed and used to drive the narrative of the project. Projections include a sophisticated understanding of how small changes in interest or fees impact total wealth over the first year.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately calculates interest earned on savings and interest charged on debt. Projections for the 'First Year' are mathematically sound and clearly presented.
Developing
2 PointsMathematical applications show an understanding of the concepts, but contain minor errors that affect the final totals. Basic formulas are used correctly.
Beginning
1 PointsSignificant mathematical errors make financial projections unreliable. Struggles to apply formulas for APY or APR.