
Toledo War: Conflict and Perspectives Simulation
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we simulate the Toledo War to uncover and compare the diverse perspectives and interests of Michigan settlers, Ohio settlers, the U.S. government, and Native American tribes, while examining the geopolitical, cultural, economic, and social factors that shaped and resulted from the conflict?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What were the main causes and consequences of the Toledo War from differing perspectives including Michigan settlers, Ohio settlers, the US government, and Native American tribes?
- How did geopolitical interests shape the viewpoints and actions of the involved parties during the Toledo War?
- In what ways did the outcome of the Toledo War influence state boundaries and political power in the region?
- What role did cultural, economic, and social factors play in the conflict known as the Toledo War?
- How can simulation activities help us better understand historical conflicts and the perspectives of those involved?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to identify and compare the key perspectives and interests involved in the Toledo War, including those of Michigan settlers, Ohio settlers, the US government, and Native American tribes.
- Students will critically analyze how geopolitical, cultural, economic, and social factors influenced the Toledo War and its outcomes.
- Students will demonstrate the ability to use historical evidence to argue and defend a perspective during the Toledo War simulation.
- Students will collaborate effectively in a simulation to explore and understand historical conflicts from multiple viewpoints.
- Students will reflect on the impact of the Toledo War on state boundaries and the distribution of political power in the region.
Common Core Standards
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsMystery Artifact Exhibit
Present students with a collection of mysterious historical artifacts related to the Toledo War, such as maps, letters, clothing, and tools, without providing any context. Challenge students to investigate the origins and significance of these artifacts, leading to an exploration of different perspectives and motivations during the conflict.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Artifact Investigation Quest
Students will explore a curated collection of mysterious artifacts associated with the Toledo War without initial context. They will work in groups to hypothesize the origins, significance, and the perspective of the artifact's use. This activity encourages critical thinking and sets the foundation for understanding multiple viewpoints of the Toledo War.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityEach group will present a short report or digital presentation summarizing their findings and hypotheses about their artifact.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.1, as students read and analyze historical text and sources, and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.6 by examining different perspectives.Perspective Position Papers
Students will write position papers from the viewpoint of one party involved in the Toledo War (Michigan settler, Ohio settler, U.S. government, Native Tribe). They will research and gather evidence to support this perspective and consider other perspectives to create a nuanced argument.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-researched position paper that articulates the assigned perspective, supported by historical evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.W.9 for using evidence from texts to support analysis and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.6 by shaping narratives through specific viewpoints.Simulation Strategy Session
Students will participate in a simulation activity where they plan and debate strategies representing their assigned perspectives in the Toledo War scenario. This activity helps students practice collaboration, communication, and critical thinking.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityStudents will engage in a collaborative simulation reflecting the complex interactions of the Toledo War, producing reaction plans and reflections on their perspective's effectiveness.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.1 for engaging in conversations and collaborations, and further develops CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.6 by exploring views in a dynamic setting.Boundary Impact Analysis
In this activity, students will investigate how the Toledo War altered state boundaries and political power in the region. They will create an analysis report, using maps, timelines, and primary sources to support their examination.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed analysis report with visuals, reflecting the impact of the Toledo War on state boundaries and regional political dynamics.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.1 by requiring close reading of historical sources, as well as fostering understanding of cause and effect through CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.R.6.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioToledo War Simulation Rubric
Critical Analysis and Historical Understanding
Evaluates the students' ability to critically analyze historical artifacts and texts related to the Toledo War, understanding its causes and implications.Artifact Analysis
Ability to observe, document, and hypothesize the origins and significance of historical artifacts related to the Toledo War.
Exemplary
4 PointsOffers a sophisticated analysis of the artifact, providing a well-supported and innovative hypothesis about its significance and origins, utilizing multiple sources effectively.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides a thorough analysis of the artifact, with a clear and logical hypothesis supported by appropriate evidence from at least two sources.
Developing
2 PointsOffers a basic analysis, presenting a hypothesis that is partially supported by evidence and demonstrates some understanding of the context.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents limited analysis with unclear or unsupported hypotheses, showing minimal understanding of the artifact's historical context.
Textual Evidence and Perspective-Taking
Effectiveness in using historical texts to analyze and present the perspective during the Toledo War in written assignments.
Exemplary
4 PointsUses a wide range of well-chosen texts to present a nuanced perspective, effectively incorporating and synthesizing evidence to support the argument.
Proficient
3 PointsIncorporates texts to present a clear perspective, supporting the argument with relevant evidence from multiple sources.
Developing
2 PointsUses minimal texts to present a basic perspective, with some relevant evidence that inconsistently supports the argument.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to present a clear perspective, with limited use of texts and insufficient evidence to support the argument.
Collaboration and Communication
Assesses the students' ability to participate effectively in collaborative simulations and discussions, representing assigned perspectives from the Toledo War.Participation in Simulations
Level of engagement and effective communication during the simulation strategy session.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates excellent communication and leadership, actively negotiating and synthesizing diverse views with clear and persuasive argumentation.
Proficient
3 PointsParticipates actively with clear communication, supporting group strategies effectively and responding to peers' viewpoints.
Developing
2 PointsParticipates in the simulation with basic communication, occasionally supporting group strategies but with limited contribution to discussions.
Beginning
1 PointsShows minimal participation, with unclear communication and little contribution to group strategies or discussions.
Feedback and Reflection
Ability to leverage peer feedback for refinement and reflect on learning experiences during the simulation activities.
Exemplary
4 PointsCritically evaluates feedback, demonstrating insightful reflection and significant adaptation of ideas and strategies in the final synthesis.
Proficient
3 PointsUses feedback constructively, showing clear reflection and making adjustments to improve strategies and understanding.
Developing
2 PointsAcknowledges feedback with basic reflection, making limited adjustments in response to insights from peers.
Beginning
1 PointsMinimal engagement with feedback and reflection, showing limited adjustment or recognition of the learning process.
Research and Reporting
Measures the students' capability to conduct research and compile comprehensive reports based on state boundaries and political analysis of the Toledo War.Research and Evidence Compilation
Effectiveness in gathering, organizing, and presenting information from historical and geopolitical resources.
Exemplary
4 PointsConducts thorough research, skillfully integrating diverse resources into a coherent and compelling analysis with extensive evidence.
Proficient
3 PointsConducts effective research, integrating relevant resources into a well-organized analysis with clear evidence.
Developing
2 PointsProduces basic research, integrating some resources into a logically organized analysis with partial evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents limited research with inadequate organization and insufficient evidence integration.