
Trade Protectionism: An Economic Advising Project
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.As economic advisors, how can we guide our chosen country through the complexities of international trade, balancing its economic interests with global cooperation while considering the ethical implications of trade protectionist policies like tariffs, quotas, and subsidies on various stakeholders?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- How do trade protectionist policies, such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, influence global markets and international relations?
- What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing trade barriers for both domestic and foreign economies?
- From the perspective of an economic advisor, how would you recommend a country navigate the complexities of international trade while balancing its own economic interests with global economic cooperation?
- Can you evaluate the ethical implications of using trade protectionist measures, considering their impact on various stakeholders, including consumers, producers, and governments?
- How can economic models and diagrams be used to illustrate and analyze the effects of trade policies on market equilibrium, welfare, and efficiency?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will be able to define and explain tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, as well as analyse and evaluate their effects on markets and stakeholders.
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsConfidential Trade Crisis
Students receive a "confidential memo" outlining an urgent trade crisis impacting their assigned country. The memo details specific market pressures and challenges, demanding immediate policy recommendations. Students must then research and propose solutions, justifying their choices with economic data and analysis.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.The Great Trade Debate: Stakeholders at the Table
Students will participate in a debate, representing different stakeholder perspectives on trade protectionism. They will research and present arguments for and against specific trade policies, considering their impact on various stakeholders.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityDebate presentation materials, including arguments for and against trade protectionism from specific stakeholder perspectives.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsArguments for and against trade protection, including specific examples like protection of infant industries, national security, etc.Trade Protectionism Flashcards
Students will individually research and define key terms related to trade protectionism. They will create flashcards with definitions, examples, and visual representations of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA set of flashcards for tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, including definitions, examples, and visual representations.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsDefine and explain tariffs, quotas, subsidies, and their effects on markets and stakeholders. Analyze diagrams illustrating the impact of these policies.Market Analysis: Trade Policy in Action
Students will work in pairs to analyze the effects of a specific trade policy (tariff, quota, or subsidy) on a given market. They will create a diagram illustrating the market changes and write a report explaining their analysis.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA market diagram and a written report explaining the effects of a specific trade policy.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsDraw and explain/analyze diagrams showing the effect of a tariff/quota/subsidy on price, production, consumption, expenditures, revenues, welfare.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioTrade Protectionism and Stakeholder Impact Rubric
Understanding of Trade Policies
Assessment of students' knowledge and comprehension of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.Definition and Explanation of Trade Policies
Measures the student's ability to accurately define and explain tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides comprehensive and precise definitions and explanations of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies with insightful examples and implications.
Proficient
3 PointsProvides accurate definitions and explanations of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies with relevant examples.
Developing
2 PointsProvides basic definitions and explanations of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies with some examples.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides incomplete or unclear definitions of tariffs, quotas, and subsidies with minimal examples.
Impact on Markets and Stakeholders
Evaluates the student's ability to analyze the impact of trade policies on markets and stakeholders.
Exemplary
4 PointsThoroughly analyzes the impact of trade policies on market equilibrium, welfare, and stakeholders, providing detailed evidence and reasoning.
Proficient
3 PointsAccurately analyzes the impact of trade policies on market equilibrium and stakeholders with clear evidence.
Developing
2 PointsProvides partial analysis of the impact of trade policies with limited evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides a minimal or incorrect analysis of the impact of trade policies with insufficient evidence.
Application of Economic Models
Assessment of students' skills in utilizing economic models and diagrams to illustrate trade policy impacts.Diagram Accuracy
Evaluates the accuracy and clarity of diagrams used to illustrate trade policies.
Exemplary
4 PointsDiagrams are precise, accurately labeled, and effectively illustrate the effects of trade policies, supported by thorough explanations.
Proficient
3 PointsDiagrams are accurate and effectively illustrate the effects of trade policies with clear labeling.
Developing
2 PointsDiagrams are mostly accurate but may lack clarity in illustrating the effects of trade policies.
Beginning
1 PointsDiagrams are inaccurate and fail to clearly illustrate the effects of trade policies.
Critical Thinking and Ethical Evaluation
Assessment of students' critical thinking and ethical reasoning in trade policy evaluation.Arguments for and Against Trade Policies
Measures the student's ability to construct well-reasoned arguments for and against trade policies considering various stakeholder perspectives.
Exemplary
4 PointsConstructs sophisticated arguments, integrating a wide range of stakeholder perspectives, with nuanced ethical reasoning.
Proficient
3 PointsConstructs clear arguments incorporating multiple stakeholder perspectives and ethical considerations.
Developing
2 PointsConstructs basic arguments with limited stakeholder perspectives or ethical considerations.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to construct coherent arguments with minimal stakeholder perspectives and ethical reasoning.
Communication and Presentation Skills
Assessment of effectiveness in presenting ideas clearly and engaging with opposing viewpoints during debates.Clarity and Engagement in Communication
Measures the student's ability to communicate ideas clearly and engage effectively in debates.
Exemplary
4 PointsCommunicates ideas with exceptional clarity and engages skillfully with opposing viewpoints, demonstrating leadership in discussions.
Proficient
3 PointsCommunicates ideas clearly and engages well with opposing viewpoints.
Developing
2 PointsCommunicates ideas with some clarity and attempts to engage with opposing viewpoints.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to communicate ideas clearly and engage with opposing viewpoints.