
WWI: Investigating the Main Causes
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.To what extent were militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism responsible for the outbreak of World War I, and how did these factors shape the course and consequences of the war?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What were the M.A.I.N. causes of World War I, and how did they contribute to the outbreak of the war?
- How did militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism create a dangerous environment for war in Europe?
- To what extent was each of the M.A.I.N. causes responsible for the outbreak of World War I?
- What events triggered the outbreak of World War I, and how were they connected to the M.A.I.N. causes?
- In what ways did the M.A.I.N. causes of World War I shape the course of the war and its aftermath?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Analyze the complex interplay of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism as primary causes of World War I.
- Evaluate the extent to which each of the M.A.I.N. factors contributed to the outbreak of WWI.
- Examine the specific events that triggered World War I and their relationship to the M.A.I.N. causes.
- Assess how the M.A.I.N. causes shaped the strategies, outcomes, and long-term consequences of World War I.
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsWWI Conspiracy Theory Challenge
Present students with a series of outlandish conspiracy theories related to the start of WWI. Students must evaluate the evidence (primary source documents, historical accounts) to debunk the theories and, in the process, identify the actual factors that led to the war.The Time Traveler's Telegram
A mysterious telegram arrives, supposedly from 1914, warning of impending disaster and hinting at the complex web of alliances and rivalries. Students must decipher the message and investigate its claims to uncover the underlying causes of WWI.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Militarism's March: Arms Race Analysis
Students will investigate the concept of militarism and its role in escalating tensions before World War I. They will analyze military spending data, army sizes, and naval developments of major European powers to understand the arms race dynamic.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA visual representation of military growth (graph, chart, or infographic) accompanied by a written analysis of the arms race.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Analyze the complex interplay of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism as primary causes of World War I. Specifically focuses on militarism and its contribution to pre-war tensions.Tangled Webs: Alliance Simulation
Students will participate in a simulation to understand the complex system of alliances in Europe before World War I. They will be assigned roles representing different countries and navigate hypothetical scenarios to see how alliances could lead to widespread conflict.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA journal documenting the decisions made during the alliance simulation, along with a reflective essay on the impact of the alliance system.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Analyze the complex interplay of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism as primary causes of World War I. Specifically focuses on alliances and their role in escalating conflicts.Imperialism's Scramble: Colonial Competition Analysis
Students will examine the role of imperialism in creating rivalries and tensions among European powers. They will research specific colonial disputes and analyze how competition for resources and territories contributed to the outbreak of war.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA presentation (slideshow, poster, or video) analyzing the role of colonial disputes in escalating tensions among European powers.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Analyze the complex interplay of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism as primary causes of World War I. Specifically focuses on imperialism and its contribution to pre-war tensions.Nationalism's Flame: Case Study of Nationalistic Movements
Students will explore the impact of nationalism by examining specific nationalistic movements in Europe before World War I. They will investigate how these movements fueled tensions, particularly in the Balkans, and contributed to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA case study analyzing a specific nationalistic movement and its contribution to the outbreak of World War I, including maps and analysis.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Analyze the complex interplay of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism as primary causes of World War I. Specifically focuses on nationalism and its contribution to pre-war tensions, especially regarding the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.The Spark: Analyzing the July Crisis
Students will conduct a detailed analysis of the July Crisis of 1914, examining the series of diplomatic events and decisions that led to the outbreak of World War I. They will evaluate the role of each major power in escalating the crisis and assess the missed opportunities for de-escalation.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityAn analytical essay evaluating the role of each major power in escalating the July Crisis, supported by a timeline of key events and primary source evidence.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAddresses the learning goal: Examine the specific events that triggered World War I and their relationship to the M.A.I.N. causes. Focuses on the July Crisis as the immediate trigger and connects it to the underlying M.A.I.N. causes.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioM.A.I.N. Causes of WWI Portfolio Rubric
Understanding of M.A.I.N. Causes
Demonstrates comprehension of the key concepts of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism and their relevance to WWI.Concept Explanation
Clearly and accurately explains each of the M.A.I.N. causes.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides thorough and insightful explanations of each M.A.I.N. cause, demonstrating a deep understanding of their complexities and nuances.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly explains each of the M.A.I.N. causes with accurate details and examples.
Developing
2 PointsProvides basic explanations of the M.A.I.N. causes, but may lack detail or clarity in some areas.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to explain the M.A.I.N. causes accurately or provides incomplete explanations.
Relevance to WWI
Demonstrates a clear understanding of how each M.A.I.N. cause contributed to the outbreak of WWI.
Exemplary
4 PointsArticulates a sophisticated understanding of how each M.A.I.N. cause intricately contributed to the outbreak and trajectory of WWI, providing nuanced connections and insights.
Proficient
3 PointsClearly connects each M.A.I.N. cause to specific events and tensions that led to WWI.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies the relationship between the M.A.I.N. causes and WWI, but may not provide specific examples or detailed explanations.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to connect the M.A.I.N. causes to the outbreak of WWI.
Analysis and Critical Thinking
Demonstrates analytical skills and critical thinking in evaluating the relative importance and interplay of the M.A.I.N. causes.Cause Prioritization
Evaluates the extent to which each M.A.I.N. cause contributed to the war, providing reasoned arguments for their prioritization.
Exemplary
4 PointsProvides a compelling and insightful evaluation of the relative importance of each M.A.I.N. cause, supporting arguments with strong evidence and demonstrating a nuanced understanding of their interplay.
Proficient
3 PointsEvaluates the contribution of each M.A.I.N. cause, offering clear arguments to support their prioritization.
Developing
2 PointsAttempts to evaluate the relative importance of the M.A.I.N. causes, but may lack sufficient evidence or clear reasoning.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to evaluate the relative importance of the M.A.I.N. causes or provides unsubstantiated opinions.
Interplay of Causes
Analyzes the complex interplay and connections between the M.A.I.N. causes, demonstrating an understanding of their interconnectedness.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents a sophisticated analysis of the intricate interplay between the M.A.I.N. causes, revealing deep connections and demonstrating a holistic understanding of their combined impact.
Proficient
3 PointsAnalyzes the connections between the M.A.I.N. causes, explaining how they reinforced each other.
Developing
2 PointsIdentifies some connections between the M.A.I.N. causes, but may not fully explain their interplay.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to recognize or explain the connections between the M.A.I.N. causes.
Evidence and Support
Uses historical evidence effectively to support claims and arguments related to the M.A.I.N. causes.Evidence Selection
Selects relevant and credible evidence to support claims about the M.A.I.N. causes.
Exemplary
4 PointsSelects a wide range of highly relevant and credible evidence, demonstrating a discerning eye for sources and a commitment to thorough research.
Proficient
3 PointsSelects relevant and credible evidence to support claims.
Developing
2 PointsSelects some relevant evidence, but may include less credible or less directly related sources.
Beginning
1 PointsProvides little to no relevant evidence to support claims.
Evidence Application
Effectively uses evidence to support arguments, providing clear explanations of how the evidence supports the claims.
Exemplary
4 PointsMasterfully integrates evidence into arguments, providing insightful explanations of its significance and drawing nuanced connections to support claims.
Proficient
3 PointsEffectively uses evidence to support arguments, explaining how it supports the claims.
Developing
2 PointsUses evidence, but may not fully explain how it supports the claims or may misinterpret the evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsFails to use evidence effectively or misinterprets the evidence.
Communication and Presentation
Communicates ideas clearly and effectively through written or visual presentations.Clarity and Organization
Presents information in a clear, concise, and well-organized manner.
Exemplary
4 PointsPresents information with exceptional clarity and organization, creating a seamless and engaging experience for the audience.
Proficient
3 PointsPresents information in a clear and well-organized manner.
Developing
2 PointsPresents information in a somewhat organized manner, but may lack clarity in some areas.
Beginning
1 PointsPresents information in a disorganized and confusing manner.
Visual Appeal (If Applicable)
Creates visually appealing and informative presentations (if applicable).
Exemplary
4 PointsCreates a visually stunning and informative presentation that enhances understanding and engagement.
Proficient
3 PointsCreates a visually appealing and informative presentation.
Developing
2 PointsCreates a presentation with some visual elements, but it may lack appeal or clarity.
Beginning
1 PointsCreates a presentation with minimal or ineffective visual elements.