
WWII Peace Treaty Conference Simulation
Inquiry Framework
Question Framework
Driving Question
The overarching question that guides the entire project.How can we simulate a WWII peace conference to understand the complex negotiations behind treaty-making and apply these insights to current global relations?Essential Questions
Supporting questions that break down major concepts.- What were the major conflicts and alliances during WWII?
- How did different countries' interests influence the outcome of peace negotiations?
- What strategies are involved in successful negotiation and treaty making?
- How do historical events like WWII shape current global relations and stability?
- What are the long-term consequences of the treaties established at the end of WWII?
- How can understanding past conflicts help us create a more peaceful future?
Standards & Learning Goals
Learning Goals
By the end of this project, students will be able to:- Students will understand the major conflicts and alliances during WWII, including the interests of different countries.
- Students will learn negotiation strategies and apply them in a simulated peace conference setting.
- Students will analyze the long-term consequences of WWII treaties and their impact on current global relations.
- Students will develop skills in writing arguments and supporting claims with evidence during negotiations.
- Students will engage in collaborative discussions, simulating historical peacemaking processes.
Provided Academic Standard
Common Core English Language Arts
C3 Framework for Social Studies
Entry Events
Events that will be used to introduce the project to studentsChoose Your Own Adventure: Future Peace
Students engage in an interactive story where they make key decisions affecting global peace over the years following WWII. This encourages exploration of the 'what ifs' and critical thinking about the outcomes of peace decisions made at the conference.Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities
These activities progressively build towards your learning goals, with each submission contributing to the student's final portfolio.Conflict and Alliance Map Creation
Students create a visual map detailing the major conflicts and alliances during WWII, delving into each country's interests and objectives.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA detailed visual map that showcases major WWII conflicts, alliances, and interests of different countries.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsAligns with standard 7.H2.2 as it helps students compare the causes and effects of conflict and prepare for peace negotiations.Negotiation Strategy Workshop
A workshop where students learn and practice negotiation strategies essential for treaty-making and diplomatic discussions.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA portfolio of tested negotiation strategies and reflections on their effectiveness.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsSupports 7.H2.2 by exploring approaches to peacemaking and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.7.1 by engaging in collaborative discussions.Country Position Papers
Students write detailed position papers representing their assigned country's stance in the peace conference.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA well-argued position paper articulating the assigned country's goals and strategies.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsCovers CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.7.1 by requiring argument writing and D2.His.14.6-8 by analyzing historical perspectives.Simulation Role-play Preparations
Prepare students for the peace treaty conference simulation by organizing them into country delegations and clarifying their roles and objectives.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityPrepared country delegations ready to engage in a realistic peace treaty simulation.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsReinforces CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.7.1 through collaboration and clarifies the learning goal of applying negotiation strategies.WWII Peace Treaty Simulation
Conduct the WWII peace treaty simulation where students enact the roles of country negotiators, implementing learned strategies and positions.Steps
Here is some basic scaffolding to help students complete the activity.Final Product
What students will submit as the final product of the activityA simulation document summarizing treaties and agreements reached, reflecting joint diplomatic efforts.Alignment
How this activity aligns with the learning objectives & standardsFully embodies 7.H2.2 by comparing multiple causes and effects of conflict and understanding peacemaking.Rubric & Reflection
Portfolio Rubric
Grading criteria for assessing the overall project portfolioWWII Peace Treaty Conference Simulation Assessment Rubric
Historical Understanding
Assessment of students' grasp of major WWII conflicts, alliances, and how countries' interests influenced peace negotiations.Research and Analysis
Evaluation of students' research on WWII conflicts, alliances, and historical context.
Exemplary
4 PointsDemonstrates comprehensive understanding of WWII conflicts and alliances with detailed analysis of countries' interests and outcomes.
Proficient
3 PointsShows thorough understanding of major WWII conflicts and alliances, with a clear analysis of countries' interests.
Developing
2 PointsOffers a basic understanding of some major WWII conflicts and alliances with limited analysis of countries' interests.
Beginning
1 PointsDemonstrates minimal understanding of WWII conflicts and alliances, with little to no analysis of countries' interests.
Visual Map Creation
Assessment of the visual representation of WWII conflicts, alliances, and countries' objectives.
Exemplary
4 PointsCreates a highly detailed and accurate visual map that clearly illustrates major conflicts, alliances, and countries' objectives.
Proficient
3 PointsDevelops a detailed visual map illustrating major WWII conflicts, alliances, and countries' objectives clearly.
Developing
2 PointsProduces a visual map that includes some major conflicts and alliances but lacks detail or clarity about countries' objectives.
Beginning
1 PointsAttempts to create a visual map with minimal depiction of conflicts, alliances, and little clarity on objectives.
Negotiation Skills
Evaluation of students' ability to learn and practice negotiation strategies during the simulation.Strategy Application
Assessment of students' ability to apply learned negotiation strategies effectively.
Exemplary
4 PointsConsistently applies advanced negotiation strategies resulting in effective and innovative solutions during the simulation.
Proficient
3 PointsApplies effective negotiation strategies that facilitate successful outcomes most of the time.
Developing
2 PointsApplies basic negotiation strategies with varying degrees of success and consistency.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to apply negotiation strategies effectively, needing significant guidance.
Collaborative Discussions
Evaluation of engagement and contribution during group discussions and simulation activities.
Exemplary
4 PointsShows leadership during collaborative activities, facilitating discussions, and driving group success.
Proficient
3 PointsParticipates actively in collaborative discussions, contributing valuable insights and ideas.
Developing
2 PointsEngages in collaborative discussions with encouragement, offering basic insights.
Beginning
1 PointsParticipates sporadically in discussions, requiring support to engage meaningfully.
Argument Writing
Assessment of students' ability to articulate and support their country’s position and goals.Position Paper Clarity
Evaluation of the clarity, relevance, and persuasiveness of the country’s position paper.
Exemplary
4 PointsCrafts an exceptionally clear, well-reasoned, and persuasive position paper supported by strong evidence.
Proficient
3 PointsDevelops a clear and persuasive position paper with relevant supporting evidence.
Developing
2 PointsPresents a partially effective position paper with some clarity and supporting evidence.
Beginning
1 PointsStruggles to articulate a clear argument with minimal evidence in the position paper.